Dukes v. Waitkevitch, 429 U.S. 932 (1976). · Go Syfert
Search
Dukes v. Waitkevitch, 429 U.S. 932 (1976). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
113 citation events (31 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Cooper, 9-06-49 (9-24-2007) (ohioctapp, 2007-09-24)
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
cited Cited "see" State v. Cooper, 9-06-49 (9-24-2007)
Ohio Ct. App. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Wolery (1976), 46 Ohio St.2d 316 , 329 , certiorari denied (1976), 429 U.S. 932 , 97 S.Ct. 339 , 50 L.Ed.2d 301 ; State v. Haynes (1971), 25 Ohio St.2d 264 .
cited Cited "see" State v. Howard, Unpublished Decision (3-8-2000)
Ohio Ct. App. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Gibson , supra , citing State v. Wolery (1976), 46 Ohio St.2d 316 , 332 , certiorari denied (1976), 429 U.S. 932 , 50 L.Ed.2d 301 .
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Grice
Mass. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Sanders, supra at 640 , quoting Dukes v. Waitkevitch, 536 F.2d 469, 471 (1st Cir.), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 932 (1976) (interracial rape is “a classic catalyst of racial prejudice”).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Sage
Ohio · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Wolery (1976), 46 Ohio St. 2d 316, 330 , 75 O.O. 2d 366, 374, 348 N.E. 2d 351, 361 , certiorari denied (1976), 429 U.S. 932 ; State v. Neff (1975), 41 Ohio St. 2d 17, 18 , 70 O.O. 2d 82, 83, 322 N.E. 2d 274, 275 ; State v. Petro (1947), 148 Ohio St. 473 , 36 O.O. 152 , 76 N.E. 2d 355 .
cited Cited "see" State v. Riddick
N.C. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Smith, 290 N.C. 148, 160 , 226 S.E. 2d 10, 18 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 932 , 50 L.Ed. 2d 301 (1976).
discussed Cited "see" Harvey M. Sanders v. Michael Fair (2×)
1st Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
He cannot do so, for the Supreme Court has held that the Constitution requires such an inquiry only where explicit racial issues are “inextricably bound up with the conduct of the trial.” Ristaino v. Ross, 424 U.S. 589, 597 , 96 S.Ct. 1017, 1021 , 47 L.Ed.2d 258 (1976); see Dukes v. Waitkevitch, 536 F.2d 469 (1st Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 932 , 97 S.Ct. 340 , 50 L.Ed.2d 302 (1976); Commonwealth v. Lumley, supra. Cf. Rosales-Lopez v. United States, 451 U.S. 182, 192 , 101 S.Ct. 1629, 1636 , 68 L.Ed.2d 22 (1981) (plurality opinion) (requiring specific inquiry into juror bias…
cited Cited "see" State v. Dellinger
unknown court · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Smith, 290 N.C. 148 , 226 S.E. 2d 10 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 932 (1976).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Silvas
Ohio Ct. App. · 2021 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Wolery, 46 Ohio St.2d 316, 329 [, 348 N.E.2d 351 ] (1976), certiorari denied, 429 U.S. 932 , 97 S.Ct. 339 ; State v. Haynes, 25 Ohio St.2d 264 [, 267 N.E.2d 787 ] (1971).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Bustamante
Ohio Ct. App. · 2013 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Wolery, 46 Ohio St.2d 316, 329 (1976), certiorari denied, 429 U.S. 932 , 97 S.Ct. 339 ; State v. Haynes, 25 Ohio St.2d 264 (1971).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Emch, Unpublished Decision (7-31-2002)
Ohio Ct. App. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
State v. Hankerson (1982), 70 Ohio St.2d 87 , syllabus, certiorari denied (1982), 459 U.S. 870 , 103 S.Ct. 155 , 74 L.Ed.2d 130 ; see, also, State v. Wolery (1976), 46 Ohio St.2d 316 , 329 , certiorari denied (1976), 429 U.S. 932 , 97 S.Ct. 339 , 50 L.Ed.2d 301 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Boyd
Ohio Ct. App. · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, also, State v. Wolery (1976), 46 Ohio St.2d 316, 329 , 75 O.O.2d 366, 374 , 348 N.E.2d 351, 360 , certiorari denied (1976), 429 U.S. 932 , 97 S.Ct. 339 , 50 L.Ed.2d 301 ; State v. Torres (Mar. 5, 1987), Cuyahoga App. No. 51563, unreported, 1987 WL 7434 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Greenlee
N.C. Ct. App. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
Even if improper impeachment has occurred, an appellate court must find the impeachment to be sufficiently prejudicial so that “had the error in admitting these statements not occurred a dif ferent result might have been reached at trial.” State v. Cope, supra; see also State v. Peplinski, 290 N.C. 236 , 225 S.E. 2d 568 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 932 (1976); State v. Moses, 52 N.C.
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Austin
unknown court · 1980 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Peplinski, 290 N.C. 236 , 225 S.E. 2d 568 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 932 (1976).
Dukes
v.
Waitkevitch
No. 76-5326.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 1, 1976.
429 U.S. 932
Brennan, Marshall, Whom.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Lead Opinion

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.,

Dissent

Mr. Justice Marshall, with whom Mr. Justice Brennan joins,

dissenting.

The Court today refuses to review the Court of Appeals’ conclusion that a black male charged with raping a white female in the racially troubled city of Boston is not entitled to have prospective jurors questioned about racial prejudice. I do not believe that the Court of Appeals’ holding is justified by last Term’s decision in Ristaino v. Ross, 424 U. S. 589 (1976).

Charges of interracial rape have long played a major role in the mythology of racial prejudice. See, e. g., Powell v.[*933] Alabama, 287 U. S. 45 (1932); G. Allport, The Nature of Prejudice 349-355 (1958). When such a charge is made, especially in a city where racial conflict is close to the surface, it blinks reality to conclude, as the Court was able to find in Ristaino, that “[t]he circumstances . . . did not suggest a significant likelihood that racial prejudice might infect [petitioner’s] trial.” 424 U. S., at 598. Thus, under the standard set forth in Ristaino, this defendant was entitled to assure himself that the jury would consider only the evidence, not his race and the race of the alleged victim, when it determined his fate.

By refusing to review this conviction the Court does not, of course, endorse the Court of Appeals’ understanding of Ristaino. It does, however, add to the lengthening “ ‘epitaph for those “essential demands of fairness” recognized by this Court 40 years ago in Aldridge [v. United States, 283 U. S. 308 (1931)].’ ” Id., at 599 (Marshall, J., dissenting), quoting Ross v. Massachusetts, 414 U. S. 1080, 1085 (1973) (Marshall, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari). By failing to respond to those demands, the Court empties of meaning the promise of Aldridge and of our recent decision in Ham v. South Carolina, 409 U. S. 524 (1973). That promise is the fundamental guaranty of a fair trial before an impartial jury.

I respectfully dissent.