green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
10.6 score
“section 2675(a) requires an administrative filing before an action is 'instituted upon a claim against the united states.' it does not in terms apply to an action already instituted and removed and which is, upon removal, 'deemed a tort action brought against the united states.”
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 42 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
G.T. v. Castillo, M.D.
section 2675(a) requires an administrative filing before an action is 'instituted upon a claim against the united states.' it does not in terms apply to an action already instituted and removed and which is, upon removal, 'deemed a tort action brought against the united states.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kaiser v. University Physicians Clinic
See Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 626 F.2d 784, 794 (10th Cir.1980) (citing Coleco Industries, Inc. v. Berman, 567 F.2d 569 (3d Cir.1977), cert denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 S.Ct. 106 , 58 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978); Tabatchnick v. G.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Infinity Group Co.
See Coleco Industries, Inc. v. Berman, 567 F.2d 569, 574 (3d Cir.1977)(per curiam), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 S.Ct. 106 , 58 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978). “[Rjeckless conduct may be defined as ... highly unreasonable [conduct], involving not merely simple, or even inexcusable negligence, but an extreme departure from the standards of ordinary care, and which presents a danger of misleading buyers or sellers that is either known to the defendant or is so obvious that the actor must have been aware of it.” Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand, 649 F.2d 175, 193 (3d Cir.1981)(quoting McLean v. Alexander, 5…
discussed
Cited "see"
Medicare & Medicaid Guide P 42,940 United States of America v. Wendy Miller Desalvo
See United States v. McDonald, 576 F.2d 1350, 1356 (9th Cir.) (finding that developer’s subsequent statements on land deals implied knowledge of previously fraudulent conduct), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 S.Ct. 105 , 58 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978); see also United States v. Bibo-Rodriguez, 922 F.2d 1398, 1399 (9th Cir.) (holding that despite differences in method, evidence of subsequent drug smuggling could be admitted to show prior knowledge and intent), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1234 , 111 S.Ct. 2861 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1028 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re: v. Grand Jury Subpoena
See In re Grand Jury ___ ________________ Proceedings (Shiffman) 576 F.2d 703, 707 (6th Cir.), cert. ______________________ _____ denied, 439 U.S. 830 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena
See *51 In re Grand Jury Proceedings (Shiffman) 576 F.2d 703, 707 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 S.Ct. 106 , 58 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Wayne Keller
See United States v. MacDonald, 576 F.2d 1350 , 1358 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 (1978) (awareness of a high probability of fraud coupled with shutting one's eyes to avoid learning the truth will support a mail fraud conviction). 6 The district court's rulings that the Order of Disbarrment was inadmissible under Fed.R.Evid. 608(b) and questions regarding the disbarment were precluded by Fed.R.Evid. 403 were not clearly erroneous.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Earl Foster Boise
(2×)
See United States v. McDonald, 576 F.2d 1350, 1354-55 (9th Cir.) (no substantial publicity where press coverage of land fraud schemes mentioned defendant only once), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 S.Ct. 105 , 58 L.Ed.2d 124 ; cert. denied, 439 U.S. 927 , 99 S.Ct. 312 , 58 L.Ed.2d 320 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard R. Harris
See United States v. McDonald, 576 F.2d 1350, 1359-60 (9th Cir.1978) (upholding conviction of co-defendant based on circumstantial evidence involving repeated similar illegal conduct), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 (1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 927 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Petrousky v. United States
See Kelley v. United States, 568 F.2d 259, 268 (2d Cir.) (a removed case was to continue to judgment unless it was found on a pretrial motion that the employee was acting beyond the scope of his employment), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 S.Ct. 106 , 58 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald R. Rewald
See United States v. McDonald, 576 F.2d 1350, 1354-55 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 S.Ct. 105 , 58 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978). 28 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Bradley, Stephen G., Sr. And Bradley, Stephen M., Jr. And Bradley, Regina and Bradley, Timothy v. United States
See Kelley v. United States, 568 F.2d 259 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 S.Ct. 106 , 58 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978); Van Lieu v. United States, 542 F.Supp. 862 (N.D.N.Y.1982); Harris v. Burris Chemical, Inc., 490 F.Supp. 968 (N.D.Ga.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Scelzo
See United States v. McDonald, 576 F.2d 1350 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 S.Ct. 105 , 58 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978) (in trial for mail fraud, trial court did not abuse discretion in deciding that probative value of defendant’s inculpatory statements made during prior fraudulent transaction was not outweighed by prejudice).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Mercer
See State v. Smith, supra. But see State v. Agnew, 294 N.C. 382 , 241 S.E. 2d 684 (Exum, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 S.Ct. 107 , 58 L.Ed. 2d 124 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
William Hohri v. United States
(2×)
See Kelley v. United States, 568 F.2d 259 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 S.Ct. 106 , 58 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Inez Eaton Guerrero, Patrick John O'shea, Stephen Michael Kessler, Cynthia Walker and Donald Gene Booth
See United States v. McDonald, 576 F.2d 1350, 1355 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 S.Ct. 105 , 58 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Howard M. Gering
See United States v. McDonald, 576 F.2d 1350 , 1356 n. 8 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 S.Ct. 105 , 58 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978); United States v. Kennedy, 564 F.2d 1329, 1334 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 944 , 98 S.Ct. 1526 , 55 L.Ed.2d 541 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Williams v. United States
See Kelley v. U.S., 568 F.2d 259, 266-68 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 S.Ct. 106 , 58 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978) (filing of state suit within two years of tort suffices to give federal agency notice of administrative claim); see also Wollman v. Gross, 646 F.2d 1306, 1307 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 893 , 102 S.Ct. 389 , 70 L.Ed.2d 207 (1981) (Lay, Bright, McMillan & Arnold, JJ.; dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc) (the filing of a suit against the individual employee in state court should satisfy the exhaustion requirement under the F.T.C.A.).
cited
Cited "see"
Chodos v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
See Kelley v. United States, 568 F.2d 259, 265 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 S.Ct. 106 , 58 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
SHARP, Stanley L. v. COOPERS & LYBRAND, Appellant
See Coleco Industries, Inc. v. Berman, 567 F.2d 569, 574 (3d Cir. 1977) (per curiam), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 S.Ct. 106 , 58 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Andrews
(2×)
See State v. Agnew, 294 N.C. 382 , 241 S.E.2d 684 , cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 S.Ct. 107 , 58 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Zemek
See United States v. McDonald, 576 F.2d 1350, 1358 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 S.Ct. 105 , 58 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Zemek
See United States v. McDonald, 576 F.2d 1350, 1358 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 S.Ct. 105 , 58 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Baumann
See United States v. McDonald, 576 F.2d 1350 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 S.Ct. 105 , 58 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978), for appellant’s conviction for his activities with Western Land Sales. 2 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Cronin
See State v. Agnew, 294 N.C. 382 , 241 S.E. 2d 684 , cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 (1978); State v. Knott, 124 N.C. 814 , 32 S.E. 798 (1899); State v. Phifer, 65 N.C. 321 (1871).
discussed
Cited "see"
Healy v. Catalyst Recovery Of Pennsylvania
See Coleco Industries, Inc. v. Berman, 567 F.2d 569 (3d Cir. 1977) (per curiam), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 S.Ct. 106 , 58 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978). 40 In Coleco, we left open the definition of recklessness.
cited
Cited "see"
Healey v. Catalyst Recovery of Pennsylvania, Inc.
See Coleco Industries, Inc. v. Berman, 567 F.2d 569 (3d Cir. 1977) (per curiam), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 S.Ct. 106 , 58 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Powell
See State v. Smith, supra. But see State v. Agnew, 294 N.C. 382 , 241 S.E. 2d 684 (Exum, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 S.Ct. 107 , 58 L.Ed. 2d 124 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bruce A. JENSEN, Defendant-Appellant
See United States v. McDonald, 576 F.2d 1350, 1357 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 S.Ct. 105 , 58 L.Ed.2d 124 (1979); United States v. Stein, 456 F.2d 844, 850 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 408 U.S. 922 , 92 S.Ct. 2489 , 33 L.Ed.2d 333 (1972). *1356 We have already ruled that the transaction was not complete when the investment agreement was executed, but continued as long as the stocks were purchased for the investors’ accounts.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Wallace W. Watkins
See United States v. McDonald, 576 F.2d 1350 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 and 927, 99 S.Ct. 105 and 312, 58 L.Ed.2d 124 and 320 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Giant Eagle of Delaware, Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand
McLean v. Alexander, 599 F.2d 1190, 1197-98 (3d Cir.1979); see also, Coleco Industries, Inc. v. Berman, 567 F.2d 569 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 S.Ct. 106 , 58 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Phar-Mor, Inc. Securities Litigation
McLean v. Alexander, 599 F.2d 1190, 1197-98 (3d Cir.1979); see also, Coleco Industries, Inc. v. Berman, 567 F.2d 569 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 S.Ct. 106 , 58 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Vincent Caterino, United States of America v. James Caterino
United States v. Diggs, 649 F.2d 731, 736 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 970 (1981). "[A]wareness of a high probability of fraud, coupled with shutting one's eyes to avoid learning the truth, may in some instances support a conviction for mail fraud." United States v. Price, 623 F.2d 587, 592 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1016 (1980); see also United States v. McDonald, 576 F.2d 1350, 1358-59 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 (1978) ("reckless indifference" as to truth of statement is sufficient to constitute knowledge in mail fraud case).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edward Skene Overaker
See also United States v. Clinton, 574 F.2d 464, 465 (9th Cir.) (venue for failure to file a tax return is proper either in the district where the defendant resides or in the district where the return should have been filed), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 S.Ct. 106 , 58 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
K-B Trucking Company and Keith Collins, Cross-Appellants v. Riss International Corporation and World Leasing, Inc., Cross-Appellees
See Kan.Stat.Ann. §§ 84-2-714(2), 84-2-721; see also Coleco Industries, Inc. v. Berman, 567 F.2d 569, 575 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 *1165 S.Ct. 106, 58 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978); Clifford v. River Bend Plantation, Inc., 55 N.C.App. 514 , 286 S.E.2d 352, 356 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stringer v. Commissioner
(2×)
See also Lysek v. Commissioner , 583 F.2d 1088 (9th Cir. 1978) , cert. denied 439 U.S. 830 ↩ (1978) , affg. a Memorandum Opinion of this Court holding an issue to be waived when the taxpayers failed to amend their pleadings to conform to the evidence. 9.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Warren v. Reserve Fund, Inc.
See, e.g., Coleco Industries, Inc. v. Berman, 567 F.2d 569, 574 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 S.Ct. 106 , 58 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978) citing 423 F.Supp. 275, 296 (E.D.Pa.1976), (“ ‘a conscious deception or ... a misrepresentation so recklessly made that the culpability attaching to such reckless conduct closely approaches that which attaches to conscious deception’ ” ...). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Warren v. The Reserve Fund, Inc.
See, e.g., Coleco Industries, Inc. v. Berman, 567 F.2d 569, 574 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 S.Ct. 106 , 58 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978) citing 423 F.Supp. 275, 296 (E.D.Pa.1976), (" 'a conscious deception or ... a misrepresentation so recklessly made that the culpability attaching to such reckless conduct closely approaches that which attaches to conscious deception' " ...) 13 In making conclusions about the SEC studies, the defendant relied on a speech given to a Mutual Funds Investment Management Conference by Lewis J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William Greene
(2×)
See also United States v. McDonald, 576 F.2d 1350, 1358 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 S.Ct. 105 , 58 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Julius B. LOCKE, Appellee, v. KANSAS CITY POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, Appellant
E. g., Watkins v. Scott Paper Co., 530 F.2d 1159 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 861 , 97 S.Ct. 163 , 50 L.Ed.2d 139 (1976); Rogers v. International Paper Co., 510 F.2d 1340 ,1354 (8th Cir.), vacated on other grounds, 423 U.S. 809 , 96 S.Ct. 19 , 46 L.Ed.2d 29 , on remand, 526 F.2d 722 (1975); Long v. Georgia Kraft Co., 450 F.2d 557 (5th Cir. 1971); see also United States v. City of Philadelphia, 573 F.2d 802 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 S.Ct. 105 , 58 L.Ed.2d 123 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Sutton
App. 72 , 252 S.E. 2d 535 (1979); see also, State v. Agnew, 294 N.C. 382 , 241 S.E. 2d 684 , cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 58 L.Ed. 2d 124 , 99 S.Ct. 107 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fields v. State
(2×)
See also United States v. McDonald, 576 F.2d 1350, 1356 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 S.Ct. 105 , 58 L.Ed.2d 124 (1979). .We commend the trial court for cautioning the prosecuting attorney and Detective Curwen regarding the importance of adhering to the protective order.
City of Philadelphia
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 77-1718.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1978.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.