green
Positive treatment
6.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
ABC, Inc. v. PrimeTime 24, Joint Venture
See Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc., 488 F.2d 714, 717-19 (5th Cir.1974); see Barber v. Kimbrell’s, Inc., 577 F.2d 216 , 226 n. 28 (4th Cir.) (adopting Johnson factors), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 934 , 99 S.Ct. 329 , 58 L.Ed.2d 330 (1978); Diamond Star Bldg.
cited
Cited "see"
SunTiger, Inc. v. Scientific Research Funding Group
See Barber v. Kimbrell’s, Inc., 577 F.2d 216 , 226-28 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 934 , 99 S.Ct. 329 , 58 L.Ed.2d 330 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
ALLRIGHT MORTGAGE CO. v. Hill
See Barber v. Kimbrell’s, Inc., 577 F.2d 216 , 226 (4th Cir.) (applying twelve Johnson factors to determine reasonable attorneys’ fees under the TILA and concluding “that these factors must be considered in arriving at a determination of reasonable attorneys’ fees in any case where such determination is necessary”), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 934 , 99 S.Ct. 329 , 58 L.Ed.2d 330 (1978); cf. Harman v. Levin, 772 F.2d 1150, 1151 (4th Cir.1985) (holding that the factors set out in Barber are properly employed in the determination of a reasonable attorney’s fee under 11 U.S.C. § 330 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sheppard v. Riverview Nursing Centre, Inc.
See Barber v. Kimbrell, 577 F.2d 216 , 266 (4th Cir.1978) (adopting twelve factor test), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 934 , 99 S.Ct. 329 , 58 L.Ed.2d 330 (1978); Daly, 790 F.2d at 1078 (Johnson factors are to be considered at the stage of setting reasonable rate and number of hours reasonably expended).
discussed
Cited "see"
Power v. Arlington Hospital Association
See Curtis v. Loether, 415 U.S. 189, 195 , 94 S.Ct. 1005, 1009 , 39 L.Ed.2d 260 (1974) (stating with regard to a suit under the anti-discrimination provision of the Fair Housing Act: "A damages action under the statute sounds basically in tort--the statute merely defines a new legal duty, and authorizes the courts to compensate a plaintiff for the injury caused by the defendant's wrongful breach."); accord Barber v. Kimbrell's, Inc., 577 F.2d 216 , 225 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 934 , 99 S.Ct. 329 , 58 L.Ed.2d 330 (1978); see also J.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Power v. Arlington Hospital Ass'n
See Curtis v. Loether, 415 U.S. 189, 195 , 94 S.Ct. 1005, 1009 , 39 L.Ed.2d 260 (1974) (stating with regard to a suit under the anti-discrimination provision of the Fair Housing Act: “A damages action under the statute sounds basically in tort— the statute merely defines a new legal duty, and authorizes the courts to compensate a plaintiff for the injury caused by the defendant’s wrongful breach.”); accord Barber v. Kimbrell’s, Inc., 577 F.2d 216 , 225 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 934 , 99 S.Ct. 329 , 58 L.Ed.2d 330 (1978); see also J.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Colonial Williamsburg Foundation v. Kittinger Co.
See Anderson v. Morris, 658 F.2d 246, 249 (4th Cir.1981) (applying twelve factors enunciated in Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, 488 F.2d 714 (5th Cir.1974) and adopted by Fourth Circuit in Barber v. Kimbrell’s Inc., 577 F.2d 216 , 226 n. 28 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 934 , 99 S.Ct. 329 , 58 L.Ed.2d 330 (1978)).
discussed
Cited "see"
The Colonial Williamsburg Foundation v. The Kittinger Company
See Anderson v. Morris, 658 F.2d 246, 249 (4th Cir.1981) (applying twelve factors enunciated in Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, 488 F.2d 714 (5th Cir.1974) and adopted by Fourth Circuit in Barber v. Kimbrell's Inc., 577 F.2d 216 , 226 n. 28 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 934 , 99 S.Ct. 329 , 58 L.Ed.2d 330 (1978)).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca3 1992
See Barber v. Kimbrell's, Inc., 577 F.2d 216 , 226 (4th Cir.) (requiring district court to make detailed findings of fact with respect to each factor to facilitate appellate review), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 934 (1978). 14 Marshak next complains that the amount of the attorneys' fees award is excessive, arguing principally that the number of hours submitted by Pinkney's attorneys was unreasonable.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Bernard Hill, Inc.
See Barber v. Kimbrell’s Inc., 577 F.2d 216 (4th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 934 , 99 S.Ct. 329 , 58 L.Ed.2d 330 (1978), applying criteria originally set forth in the leading case of Johnson v. Georgia Highway *70 Express, Inc., 488 F.2d 714 (5th Cir.1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Gary Green v. Maurice P. Foley, Gary Green v. Maurice P. Foley
See Barber v. Kimbrell's, Inc., 577 F.2d 216 , 226 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 934 (1978). 9 The reading of Introcaso is, however, too broad.
cited
Cited "see"
Hayes v. International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots
See Barber v. Kimbrell’s Inc., 577 F.2d 216 , 226 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 934 , 99 S.Ct. 329 , 58 L.Ed.2d 330 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Leonard Jed Co.
See Barber v. Kimbrell’s, Inc., 577 F.2d 216 (4th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 934 , 99 S.Ct. 329 , 58 L.Ed.2d 330 (1978), applying criteria originally set forth in the leading case of Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc., 488 F.2d 714 (5th Cir. 1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Experimental Pathology Laboratories, Inc. v. Bioassay Systems Corporation
See Barber v. Kimbrell's, Inc., 577 F.2d 216 , 226 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 934 (1978). 7 REVERSED and REMANDED. 1 The staffing contract provided: "This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed and enforced in accordance with, the laws of the State of Illinois applicable to agreements executed and to be performed in Illinois." There is no dispute that Illinois law also governs the guarantee agreement
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Sly
See Barber v. Kimbrell’s, Inc., 577 F.2d 216 (4th Cir.1978), cert. denied 439 U.S. 934 , 99 S.Ct. 329 , 58 L.Ed.2d 330 (1978); King v. Greenblatt, 560 F.2d 1024 (1st Cir.1977) cert. denied 438 U.S. 916 , 98 S.Ct. 3146 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1161 (1978); Finney v. Hutto, 548 F.2d 740 (8th Cir.1977) reh’g denied 439 U.S. 1122 , 99 S.Ct. 1035 , 59 L.Ed.2d 83 (1979); Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., 526 F.2d 67 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976); In Re Humbert, 21 B.R. 489 (Bkrtcy.N.D.Ohio 1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Gillespie v. Brewer
See Barber v. Kimbrell’s, Inc., 577 F.2d 216 , 226 n. 28 (4th Cir.1978) cert. denied, 439 U.S. 934 , 99 S.Ct. 329 , 58 L.Ed.2d 330 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Redic v. Gary H. Watts Realty Co.
See Barber v. Kimbrell’s, Inc., 577 F.2d 216 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 934 , 99 S.Ct. 329 , 58 L.Ed.2d 330 (1978) (award of attorney’s fees under Truth in Lending Act).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca4 1984
See VanDyke v. Bluefield Gas Co., 210 F.2d 620, 622 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 1014 , 74 S.Ct. 870 , 98 L.Ed. 1137 (1954). 21 In his $7,500 award, the trial judge followed the standards we set in Barber v. Kimbrell's, Inc., 577 F.2d 216 , 226 n. 28 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 934 , 99 S.Ct. 329 , 58 L.Ed.2d 330 (1978), for any attorney's fees determination. 2 Initially, the trial judge multiplied the number of hours reasonably expended by the customary hourly rate to establish a preliminary amount for the fee award.
cited
Cited "see"
Disabled Action v. Mayor of Baltimore
See generally Barber v. Kimbrell’s, Inc., 577 F.2d 216 , 226 (4 Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 934 , 99 S.Ct. 329 , 58 L.Ed.2d 330 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
ca4 1982
See generally Barber v. Kimbrell's, Inc., 577 F.2d 216 , 226 (4 Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 934 , 99 S.Ct. 329 , 58 L.Ed.2d 330 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dixey v. Idaho First National Bank
Kessler v. Associates Financial Services Co., 639 F.2d 498, 499-500 (9th Cir. 1981); see Barber v. Kimbrell’s, Inc., 577 F.2d 216 , 226 (4th Cir.), cert, denied, 439 U.S. 934 , 99 S.Ct. 329 , 58 L.Ed.2d 330 (1978); McGowan v. Credit Center of North Jackson, Inc., 546 F.2d 73, 77 (5th Cir. 1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca1 1982
Kessler v. Associates Financial Services Co., 639 F.2d 498, 499-500 (9th Cir. 1981); see Barber v. Kimbrell's, Inc., 577 F.2d 216 , 226 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 934 , 99 S.Ct. 329 , 58 L.Ed.2d 330 (1978); McGowan v. Credit Center of North Jackson, Inc., 546 F.2d 73, 77 (5th Cir. 1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dow Chemical Co. v. Texaco Refining & Marketing, Inc.
See Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 437 , 103 S.Ct. 1933, 1941 , 76 L.Ed.2d 40 (1983) (stating that the discretion vested in the trial judge “is appropriate in view of the district court’s superior understanding of the litigation”); Colonial Williamsburg Found, v. Kittinger Co., 38 F.3d 133 , 138 (4th Cir.1994) (“It is well settled that district courts have considerable discretion in awarding attorneys’ fees____”); see also Barber v. Kimbrell’s, Inc., 577 F.2d 216 , 226 n. 28 (4th Cir.) (announcing twelve factors to be considered by the district court in calculating an award …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnson & Towers Baltimore, Inc. v. Vessel \Hunter\""
See e.g., Barber v. Kimbrells, Inc., 577 F.2d 216 , 226 n. 28 (4th Cir.) cert. denied, 439 U.S. 934 , 99 S.Ct. 329 , 58 L.Ed.2d 330 (1978) (attorney fee standards for prevailing plaintiff in a civil rights case); Deleon Enterprises, Inc. v. Gary Hart & Assoc., Ltd., 92 Md.App. 399, 419 , 608 A.2d 828 (1992) (factors court should consider when awarding attorney fees against a party who has maintained an action in bad faith).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
F.S. & P. Coal Co. v. Inter-Mountain Coals, Inc.
See also, Barber v. Kimbrell’s, Inc., 577 F.2d 216 , 226 (4th Cir.1978) cert denied 439 U.S. 934 , 99 S.Ct. 329 , 58 L.Ed.2d 330 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sullivan v. Easco Corp.
Compare Barber v. Kimbrells, Inc., 577 F.2d 216 , 226 n. 28 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 934 , 99 S.Ct. 329 , 58 L.Ed.2d 330 (1978), citing Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc., 488 F.2d 714, 714-19 (5th Cir.1974).
Rosenberg
v.
Joint Bar Association Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts
v.
Joint Bar Association Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts
No. 78-5340.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 30, 1978.
Published
App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 2d Jud. Dept. Cer-tiorari denied.