green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.9 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 2 distinct cases ·
…a plea bargain severely limits the discretion of a sentencing judge
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Engin Kamil Yesil and Yalie Golan, United States of America v. Glenn Gert Deppe, A/K/A \Vern\" Lnu"
(2×)
a plea bargain severely limits the discretion of a sentencing judge
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Engin Kamil Yesil and Yalie Golan, United States of America v. Glenn Gert Deppe, A/K/A \Vern\" Lnu"
(2×)
a plea bargain severely limits the discretion of a sentencing judge
discussed
Cited "see"
Salaman v. City of Waterbury
Section 321 of the Practice Book, provides for a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict “in accordance with [the party’s] motion for a directed verdict.” Berry v. Loiseau, 223 Conn. 786, 819 , 614 A.2d 414 (1992); see State v. Avcollie, 178 Conn. 450, 455 , 423 A.2d 118 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S. Ct. 667 , 62 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Kruelski
See State v. Avcollie, 178 Conn. 450, 452 , 423 A.2d 118 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S. Ct. 667 , 62 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Mosiurchak v. Senkowski
See Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken, 444 F.Supp. 648 (D.S.C.1977), aff'd in part, rev’d in part 594 F.2d 979 (4th Cir.1979), cert. denied 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S.Ct. 666 , 62 L.Ed.2d 645 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
McGrane v. Reader's Digest Ass'n, Inc.
See Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken, 444 F.Supp. 648 (D.S.C.1977), aff'd in part, rev'd in part 594 F.2d 979 (4th Cir.1979), cert. denied 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S.Ct. 666 , 62 L.Ed.2d 645 (1980); L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Robbins v. Van Gilder
See State v. Avcollie, 178 Conn. 450, 471 , 423 A.2d 118 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S. Ct. 667 , 62 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lois Anderson v. United States
See Deutsch v. Commissioner, 599 F.2d 44 (2nd Cir.1979) (holding that where the exception of section 7502 is not literally applicable, courts have consistently rejected testimony or other evidence as proof of the actual date of mailing), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S.Ct. 665 , 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980); Miller v. United States, 784 F.2d 728 (6th Cir.1986) (same); Surowka v. United States, 909 F.2d 148 (6th Cir.1990) (same). *491 We do not read Shipley so broadly.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Paolella
See State v. Avcollie, 178 Conn. 450, 452 , 423 A.2d 118 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S. Ct. 667 , 62 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Brannon v. Commissioner
See Deutsch v. Commissioner, 599 F.2d 44 (2d Cir. 1979) , affg. an unreported decision of this Court, cert. denied 444 U.S. 1015 (1980) ; Radding v. Commissioner, T.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Latroy D. Ray, Johnny Lee May, and Boyd McChristion
See United States v. Runck, 601 F.2d 968, 969-70 (8th Cir.1979) (during sentencing judge added condition of restitution, a term outside the bounds of plea agreement), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S.Ct. 665 , 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Acequia, Inc., Debtor. Acequia, Inc. v. Vernon B. Clinton
See generally Bank of Arizona v. Trustee for Westgate-Califomia Corp., 609 F.2d 1274 , 1278 (9th Cir.1979) cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S.Ct. 667 , 62 L.Ed.2d 645 (1980). 16 . 11 U.S.C. §§ 1123 (a)(6) and (a)(7) (discussed infra) are derived from 11 U.S.C. § 616 (amended 1978) of the former Bankruptcy Act and copied almost verbatim.
discussed
Cited "see"
Benrey v. Commissioner
(2×)
See Deutsch v. Commissioner, 599 F.2d 44 , 46 (2d Cir. 1979) , affg. an order of dismissal by this Court, cert. denied 444 U.S. 1015 (1980) . 5 But, in the case of a petition sent by U.S. registered mail or certified mail, section 7502(c) and section 301.7502-1(d)(1), Proced. & Admin.
discussed
Cited "see"
Storelli v. Commissioner
(2×)
See Deutsch v. Commissioner, 599 F.2d 44, 46 (2d Cir. 1979), affg. an order of dismissal by this Court, cert. denied 444 U.S. 1015 (1980). 7 In the case of a petition sent by U.S. registered mail, section 7502(c)(1) provides that “such registration shall be prima facie evidence that the return, claim, statement, or other document was delivered to the agency, officer, or office to which addressed,” and the date of registration shall be deemed the postmark date.
discussed
Cited "see"
Andrus v. P-Burg Coal Co., Inc.
See Marshall v. Stoudt’s Ferry Preparation Co., 602 F.2d 589 , (3 Cir. 1979), cert. den. 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S.Ct. 665 , 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980); Marshall v. Nolichuckey Sand Co., Inc., 606 F.2d 693 (6 Cir. 1979), cert. den. -U.S. -, 100 S.Ct. 1835 , 64 L.Ed.2d 261 ; Marshall v. Sink, 614 F.2d 37 , 48 L.W. 2541 (4 Cir. 1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gene L. Moretti v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See also Deutsch v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 599 F.2d 44, 45 (2d Cir.1979) (“[T]he Tax Court cannot assert jurisdiction unless a petition is filed within ninety days after a deficiency notice has been mailed by the Commissioner.”), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S.Ct. 665 , 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Utz v. Warden, C.C.I. Somers, No. Cv90 0107820s (Aug. 8, 1991)
See, e.g., State v. Avcollie, 178 Conn. 450 , 452 , 423 A.2d 118 (1979), cert. denied 444 U.S. 1015 , (1980); State v. Morrissey, 18 Conn. App. 658 , 659 , 560 A.2d 471 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Holloway
Pisel v. Stamford Hospital, [ 180 Conn. 314, 344 , 430 A.2d 1 (1980)]. ‘[T]he acceptance or rejection of an opinion of a qualified expert is a matter for the trier of fact unless the opinion is so unreasonable as to be unacceptable to a rational mind.’ National Folding Box Co. v. New Haven, 46 Conn. 578 , 586, 153 A.2d 420 (1959).” Mather v. Griffin Hospital, 207 Conn. 125, 145 , 540 A.2d 666 (1988); see also State v. Avcollie, 178 Conn. 450, 461 , 423 A.2d 118 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S. Ct. 667 , 62 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Franko v. Bronson
See, e.g., State v. Avcollie, 178 Conn. 450, 452 , 423 A.2d 118 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S. Ct. 667 , 62 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Milliken Research Corp. v. Dan River, Inc.
See also The Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken Corp., 444 F.Supp. 648 , 725 n. 60 (D.S.C.1977), modified, 594 F.2d 979 (4th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S.Ct. 666 , 62 L.Ed.2d 645 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re New Haven Radio, Inc.
See also Valley National Bank of Arizona v. Trustee, 609 F.2d 1274 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1015 , 100 S.Ct. 667 , 62 L.Ed.2d 645 (1980). 13 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Donovan v. Dewey
(2×)
See, e. g., Marshall v. Stoudt's Ferry Preparation Co., 602 F. 2d 589, 594 (CA3 1979) (inspectors ordered to keep confidential mine's trade secrets), cert. denied, 444 U. S. 1015 (1980).
Runck
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 79-612.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 7, 1980.
444 U.S. 1015
Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (4)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.