Gertrude Barnstone, Applicant v. Univ. of Houston No. A-978, 446 U.S. 930 (1980). · Go Syfert
Search
Gertrude Barnstone, Applicant v. Univ. of Houston No. A-978, 446 U.S. 930 (1980). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
78 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 29 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State Ex Rel. Department of Public Safety v. One 1986 Peterbilt Tractor (nmctapp, 1997-03-11)
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" State Ex Rel. Department of Public Safety v. One 1986 Peterbilt Tractor (2×)
N.M. Ct. App. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Stuckey’s Stores, Inc. v. O’Cheskey, 93 N.M. 312, 320 , 600 P.2d 258, 266 (1979), appeal dismissed, 446 U.S. 930 , 100 S.Ct. 2145 , 64 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980).
cited Cited "see" Quilici v. Village of Morton Grove
N.D. Ill. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See City of Carbondale v. Brewster, 78 Ill.2d 111 , 34 Ill.Dec. 832 , 398 N.E.2d 829 (1979), appeal dismissed, 446 U.S. 931 , 100 S.Ct. 2145 , 64 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980).
discussed Cited "see" Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San Diego (2×)
SCOTUS · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Stuckey’s Stores, Inc. v. O’Cheskey, 93 N. M. 312, 600 P. 2d 258 (1979), appeal dism’d, 446 U. S. 930 (1980); State v. Lotze, 92 Wash. 2d 52 , 593 P. 2d 811 , appeal dism’d, 444 U. S. 921 (1979); Lubbock Poster Co. v. City of Lubbock, 569 S. W. 2d 935 (Tex. Civ.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." American Legion Post No. 49 v. Hughes (2×)
N.M. Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Stuckey’s Stores, Inc. v. O’Cheskey, 93 N.M. 312 , 600 P.2d 258 (1979), appeal dismissed, 446 U.S. 930 , 100 S.Ct. 2145 , 64 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980); United States v. Bureau of Revenue, 87 N.M. 164 , 531 P.2d 212 (1975).
Gertrude Barnstone, Applicant
v.
University of Houston No. A-978
79-492.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 12, 1980.
446 U.S. 930
Cited by 6 opinions  |  Published

446 U.S. 1318

100 S.Ct. 2144

64 L.Ed.2d 488

Gertrude BARNSTONE, applicant,
v.
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON et al
No. A-978

Supreme Court of the United States

May 12, 1980

On Application to Vacate Order.

Mr. Justice POWELL, Circuit Justice.

1

On m. Today, the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated the District Court Order on condition that the respondents "tape and preserve the program in issue." Applicant seeks relief from the Court of Appeals order. The respondents oppose the application, and represent that "The Death of a Princess" will be preserved on videotape for later airing should the applicant obtain a permanent injunction. The Public Broadcasting Service has filed an amicus brief also asking that the application of the applicant be denied.

2

Although applicant requests that the Court grant certiorari and reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals, in purpose and effect applicant is requesting that the order of that court be vacated, thereby reinstating the temporary restraining order of the District Court. Such a request normally comes to me as Circuit Justice. Although I may have considered referring this to the entire Court, a quorum is not present. I therefore exercise my authority as Circuit Justice to rule on applicant's application.

3

Upon consideration of the papers, I deny the application.

4

I have consulted informally with each of my Brethren who was present at the Court when these papers arrived late this afternoon. Although no other Justice has participated in the drafting of this order, I am authorized to state that each of the three whom I consulted would vote to deny this application. Of course, this action should not be taken as expressing a view on the merits of the questions raised in this case. See Graves v. Barnes, 405 U.S. 1201, 1204, 92 S.Ct. 752, 754, 30 L.Ed.2d 769 (1972).