green
Positive treatment
0.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mid-America Regional Bargaining Association v. Will County Carpenters District Council
See, eg, Consolidated Express, Inc. v. New York Shipping Association, 602 F.2d 494, 513 (3d Cir. 1979), vacated on other grounds, 448 U.S. 901 , 100 S.Ct. 3040 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1131 (1980); Leslie, Principles of Labor Antitrust, 66 Va.L.Rev. 1183,1196-97 (1980). 24 *891 This exemption was more explicitly developed by Justice White’s opinion in UMW v. Pennington, 381 U.S. 657 , 85 S.Ct. 1585 , 14 L.Ed.2d 626 (1965), and Local 189, Amalgamated Meat Cutters v. Jewel Tea Co., 381 U.S. 676 , 85 S.Ct. 1596 , 14 L.Ed.2d 640 (1965). 25 In Pennington , after finding the statutory exemption inapplicable t…
King, Governor of Massachusetts
v.
Preterm, Inc.
v.
Preterm, Inc.
No. 79-1027.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 30, 1980.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Appeal from C. A. 1st Cir. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Mr. Justice Rehnquist, being of the view that the order of the Court of Appeals “amending its mandate” to embrace the invalidation of an entirely separate statute is not governed by FTC v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Co., 344 U. S. 206 (1952), dissents from dismissal of the appeal and would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.