green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Brandon v. Hines
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
But see Wells v. Southern Airways, Inc., 517 F.2d 132 , 134 n.3 (5th Cir. 1975) (per curiam) (order directing rehearing on employee discharge is a final decision), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 862 , 101 S.Ct. 166 , 66 L.Ed.2d 78 (1980). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Tolbert v. State
United States v. Colbert , 474 F.2d 174 , 176 (5th Cir. 1973) ; see generally, e.g., Berd , 634 F.2d at 987 , United States v. Canady , 615 F.2d 694 (5th Cir.), cert. denied. 449 U.S. 862 , 101 S.Ct. 165 , 66 L.Ed.2d 78 (1980) ; United States v. Williams , 569 F.2d 823 (5th Cir. 1978) ; [ United States v.] D'Avanzo , 443 F.2d 1224 [ (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 850 , 92 S.Ct. 86 , 88, 30 L.Ed.2d 89 (1971) ]. " ' "The test for abandonment is whether an individual has retained any reasonable expectation of privacy in the object. [Citation omitted.] This determination is to be made by object…
discussed
Cited "see"
Tolbert v. State
United States v. Colbert , 474 F.2d 174 , 176 (5th Cir. 1973) ; see generally, e.g., Berd , 634 F.2d at 987 , United States v. Canady , 615 F.2d 694 (5th Cir.), cert. denied. 449 U.S. 862 , 101 S.Ct. 165 , 66 L.Ed.2d 78 (1980) ; United States v. Williams , 569 F.2d 823 (5th Cir. 1978) ; [ United States v.] D'Avanzo , 443 F.2d 1224 [ (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 850 , 92 S.Ct. 86 , 88, 30 L.Ed.2d 89 (1971) ]. " ' "The test for abandonment is whether an individual has retained any reasonable expectation of privacy in the object. [Citation omitted.] This determination is to be made by object…
discussed
Cited "see"
Thompson v. State
United States v. Colbert , 474 F.2d 174 , 176 (5th Cir. 1973); see generally, e.g., Berd , 634 F.2d at 987 , United States v. Canady , 615 F.2d 694 (5th Cir.), cert. denied. 449 U.S. 862 , 101 S.Ct. 165 , 66 L.Ed.2d 78 (1980); United States v. Williams , 569 F.2d 823 (5th Cir. 1978); [ United States v. ] D'Avanzo , 443 F.2d 1224 [(2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 850 , 92 S.Ct. 86 , 88 , 30 L.Ed.2d 89 (1971)]. " 'The test for abandonment is whether an individual has retained any reasonable expectation of privacy in the object. [Citation omitted.] This determination is to be made by objective s…
discussed
Cited "see"
Buck v. Commonwealth
See Craig v. Alabama State Univ., 451 F.Supp. 1207, 1208-09 (1978), aff'd, 614 F.2d 1295 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 862 , 101 S.Ct. 167 , 66 L.Ed.2d 79 (1980); Goins v. Allgood, 391 F.2d 692, 697 (5th Cir.1968); Bradley v. School Bd. of Richmond, 317 F.Supp. 555, 566 (E.D.Va.1970); *191 Sims v. Baggett, 247 F.Supp. 96, 108 (M.D.Ala.1965).
cited
Cited "see"
Abron v. State
See Parsley v. State (1980) 273 Ind. 46 , 401 N.E.2d 1360, 1361 , cert. denied 449 U.S. 862 , 101 S.Ct. 166 , 66 L.Ed.2d 79 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Oscar Javier Garcia
See United States v. Canady, 615 F.2d 694, 697 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 862 , 101 S.Ct. 165 , 66 L.Ed.2d 78 (1980) (defendant who abandons or disclaims ownership of a suitcase can entertain no legitimate expectation of privacy in that suitcase or its contents and, therefore, cannot challenge a search of that suitcase); United States v. Anderson, 500 F.2d 1311, 1318 (5th Cir.1974); United States v. Colbert, 474 F.2d 174, 176 (5th Cir.1973) (en banc) (“it is settled law that one has no standing to complain of a search or seizure of property that he has voluntarily abandoned”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Allen v. Allied Plant Maintenance Company of Tennessee
See Wells v. Southern Airways, Inc., 616 F.2d 107, 110 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 862 , 101 S.Ct. 166 , 66 L.Ed.2d 78 (1980); McFarland v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 745, 535 F.Supp. 970, 977 (N.D.Tex.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kimball
See United States v. Sanchez-Jaramillo, 637 F.2d 1094, 1099-1100 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 862 , 101 S.Ct. 166 , 66 L.Ed.2d 79 (1980); United States v. Perez-Esparza, 609 F.2d 1284, 1288-91 (9th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald E. Veatch
Accord, United States v. Canady, 615 F.2d 694, 696-97 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 862 , 101 S.Ct. 165 , 66 L.Ed.2d 78 (1980); United States v. Miller, 589 F.2d 1117, 1131 (1st Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 958 , 99 S.Ct. 1499 , 59 L.Ed.2d 771 (1979); United States v. Anderson, 500 F.2d 1311, 1318 (5th Cir. 1974); United States v. Colbert, 474 F.2d 174, 176-77 (5th Cir. 1973) (en banc).
discussed
Cited "see"
Illinois Migrant Council v. Pilliod
See United States v. Sanchez-Jaramillo, 637 F.2d 1094, 1099 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 862 , 101 S.Ct. 166 , 66 L.Ed.2d 279 (1980). [11] Other courts, while not explicitly deciding the question, state the applicable rule as requiring reasonable suspicion that the alien is unlawfully in the country.
cited
Cited "see"
Illinois Migrant Council v. Pilliod
See United States v. Sanchez-Jaramillo, 637 F.2d 1094, 1099 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 862 , 101 S.Ct. 166 , 66 L.Ed.2d 279 (1980). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Crouch v. State
A valid rule or regulation has the force and effect of law, and generally is effective from the promulgation date until modification or repeal by the agency and has "no retroactive effect." Van Allen v. State (1984), Ind.App., 467 N.E.2d 1210, 1213 ; see also Parsley v. State (1980), 273 Ind. 46, 48-49 , 401 N.E.2d 1360, 1362 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 862 , 101 S.Ct. 166 , 66 L.Ed.2d 79 (general rule is that the law in effect at the time a crime is committed is controlling).
Canady
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 79-6784.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1980.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.