green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.1 score
“the law will not permit law enforcement officials to do by ruse, trickery, deceit and deception that which it is not permitted to do openly and honestly. nor will the law permit the state to dishonor its commitment and renege on its promise to defendant's counsel.”
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Limited
United States v. Jack Osborn Watson, Jeffrey Craig Evenson, and Dale Stanley Browning
(3×)
also: Cited as authority (quoted), Cited "see, e.g."
while the coast guard is thus left with considerable discretion in deciding which vessels to stop, we believe such discretion is virtually unavoidable in a scheme of regulation that depends on stops conducted at sea, far from courts and magistrates.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Baillargeon
the law will not permit law enforcement officials to do by ruse, trickery, deceit and deception that which it is not permitted to do openly and honestly. nor will the law permit the state to dishonor its commitment and renege on its promise to defendant's counsel.
discussed
Cited "see"
State of Tennessee v. Jonathan Alajemba
See State v. Berry, 592 S.W.2d 553, 561 (Tenn.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 887 (1980) (holding that statements made to a jail informant, although voluntary, were inadmissible as a violation of defendant’s sixth amendment right, in part, because defendant’s attorney had specifically instructed officers not to question his client outside his presence).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Grant
See id. at 580 n.2, citing United States v. Harper, 617 F.2d 35, 40-41 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 887 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Baker
See State v. Berry, 692 S.W.2d 553, 561 (Tenn.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 887 , 101 S.Ct. 241 , 66 L.Ed.2d 112 (1980) (holding that statements made to a jail informant, although voluntary, were inadmissible as a violation of defendant’s sixth amendment right, in part, because defendant’s attorney had specifically instructed officers not to question his client outside his presence).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Tykwinski
Accord, United States v. Harper, 617 F.2d 35 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 887 , 101 S.Ct. 243 , 66 L.Ed.2d 113 (1980); Lacy v. State, 608 P.2d 19 (Alaska 1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Villanueva
See United States v. Hilton, 619 F.2d 127 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 887 , 101 S.Ct. 243 , 66 L.Ed.2d 113 (1980) (defendant’s denial of ownership of suitcase deprived him of standing to object to its search); United States v. Kendall, 655 F.2d 199 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1434 , 71 L.Ed.2d 652 (1982) (defendant who disclaims ownership of property surrenders reasonable expectation of privacy therein); United States v. Taylor, 473 F.Supp. 65 (E.D.Pa.1979) (passenger who does not claim interest in property seized, has no legitimate expectation of privacy).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jack Kelly Cilley, Jr., United States of America v. Phillip Stanley Kashnig, United States of America v. David Faulkner Dawson, United States of America v. Jonathan Dean Fightlin
Id.; see United States v. Hilton, 619 F.2d 127, 131-32 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 887 , 101 S.Ct. 243 , 66 L.Ed.2d 113 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cilley
Id.; see United States v. Hilton, 619 F.2d 127, 131-32 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 887 , 101 S.Ct. 243 , 66 L.Ed.2d 113 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John C. Humphrey, W.C. Garbez, and Robert D. Smith
See United States v. Hilton, 619 F.2d 127 ,131— 32 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 887 , 101 S.Ct. 243 , 66 L.Ed.2d 113 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Arvey Hawy Lyons and Vickie Elaine Lyons, A/K/A Vickie Colbert
(2×)
“The allegation in a single count of a conspiracy to commit several crimes is not duplicitous, for ‘The conspiracy is the crime, and that is one, however diverse its objects.’ ” Braverman v. United States, 317 U.S. 49, 54 , 63 S.Ct. 99, 102 , 87 L.Ed. 23, 28 (1942); accord United States v. Avila-Dominguez, 610 F.2d 1266, 1270 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 887 , 101 S.Ct. 242 , 66 L.Ed.2d 113 (1980); Overstreet v. United States, 321 F.2d 459, 461 (5th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 919 , 84 S.Ct. 675 , 11 L.Ed.2d 614 (1964).
cited
Cited "see"
State Ex Rel. Roach v. Roth
See United States v. Avila-Dominguez, 610 F2d 1266, 1268-69 (5th Cir), cert den sub nom Perez v. United States, 449 US 887 , 101 S Ct 242 , 66 LEd2d 113 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
National Insulation Transportation Committee v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Consolidated Rail Corporation, Intervenor
See State of New York v. United States, 568 F.2d 887 , 892-93 (2nd Cir. 1977), appeal after remand, 600 F.2d 349 (1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 887 , 101 S.Ct. 242 , 66 L.Ed.2d 113 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert D. Blair v. United States of America, Charles L. Moore v. United States of America, William G. Dodds, Jr. v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Harper, 617 F.2d 35 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 887 , 101 S.Ct. 243 , 66 L.Ed.2d 113 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Ortiz
Accord State v. Berry, 592 S.W.2d 553 (Tenn.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 887 , 101 S.Ct. 241 , 66 L.Ed.2d 112 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Lehman
(2×)
See, Trial Court Opinion at 2; see also, e.g., United States v. Morales, 889 F.2d 1058 (11th Cir.1989), United States v. Jonas, 639 F.2d 200 (5th Cir.1981), United States v. Watson, 678 F.2d 765 (9th Cir.1982), cert denied, 459 U.S. 1038 , 103 S.Ct. 451 , 74 L.Ed.2d 605 (1982), United States v. Harper, 617 F.2d 35 (4th Cir.1980), cert denied, 449 U.S. 887 , 101 S.Ct. 243 , 66 L.Ed.2d 113 (1980), United States v. Hayes, 653 F.2d 8 (1st Cir.1981). ¶ 4 While it is clear from the record that a motivation of the officers in boarding the boat was to investigate the employee’s complaint, the Unite…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Rodriguez
See, e.g., United States v. Harper, 617 F.2d 35, 40-41 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 887 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Albert Green
See, e.g., United States v. Hilton, 619 F.2d 127, 131 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 887 , 101 S.Ct. 243 , 66 L.Ed.2d 113 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Cove Tankers Corp. v. United Ship Repair, Inc.
See also United States v. Hilton, 619 F.2d 127 , 131 n.1 (1st Cir.) cert. denied, 449 U.S. 887 , 101 S.Ct. 243 , 66 L.Ed.2d 113 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tennessee
v.
Berry
v.
Berry
No. 79-1555.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1980.
Certiorari.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (2) · Supreme Court of New Hampshire (1)
Sup. Ct. Tenn. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.
Justice Blackmun would grant certiorari.