Arizona v. United States Dist. Court for the Dist. of Arizona, 459 U.S. 1191 (1983). · Go Syfert
Search
Arizona v. United States Dist. Court for the Dist. of Arizona, 459 U.S. 1191 (1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
87 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 20 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Jackson v. Stonebriar Partnership (texapp, 1996-08-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" Jackson v. Stonebriar Partnership
Tex. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Shaw v. Phillips Crane & Rigging, 636 S.W.2d 186, 187-88 (Tex.1982), appeal dism’d, 459 U.S. 1191 , 103 S.Ct. 1169 , 75 L.Ed.2d 422 (1983) (chronology of events in a process of rendition, assessment, and collection of ad valo-rem taxes).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Paul Suren Mosesian, United States of America v. Lawrence Clay Rocker
9th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Cement Antitrust Litigation, 515 F.Supp. 1076, 1078 (D.Ariz.1981), mandamus denied, 688 F.2d 1297 (9th Cir.1982), aff'd sub nom., Arizona v. United States District Court, 459 U.S. 1191 (1983).
discussed Cited "see" Bell Atlantic Corporation v. Bolger
3rd Cir. · 1993 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord In re Cement Antitrust Litig., 688 F.2d 1297, 1309 (9th Cir.1982), aff'd, 459 U.S. 1191 , 103 S.Ct. 1173 , 75 L.Ed.2d 425 (1983); Dosier v. Miami Valley Broadcasting Corp., 656 F.2d 1295, 1299 (9th Cir.1981) (dissatisfied class member could have challenged settlement by direct appeal).
discussed Cited "see" Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Bolger
3rd Cir. · 1993 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord In re Cement Antitrust Litig., 688 F.2d 1297, 1309 (9th Cir.1982), aff'd, 459 U.S. 1191 , 103 S.Ct. 1173 , 75 L.Ed.2d 425 (1983); Dosier v. Miami Valley Broadcasting Corp., 656 F.2d 1295, 1299 (9th Cir.1981) (dissatisfied class member could have challenged settlement by direct appeal).
cited Cited "see" County of Burleson v. General Electric Capital Corp.
Tex. App. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Shaw v. Phillips Crane & Rigging, 636 S.W.2d 186 (Tex.1982), appeal dismissed, 459 U.S. 1191 , 103 S.Ct. 1169 , 75 L.Ed.2d 422 (finding prede *58 cessor statute was constitutional).
cited Cited "see" Elbert J. Davis v. Xerox, a New York Corporation
9th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Cement Antitrust Litigation, 515 F.Supp. 1076 (D.Ariz.1981), aff'd, 688 F.2d 1297 (9th Cir.1982), aff'd for want of a quorum, 459 U.S. 1191 , 103 S.Ct. 1173 , 75 L.Ed.2d 425 (1983).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Johnnie Reynaga v. Sharon M. Cammisa Steve White M. Cedillo Michael T. Garcia (2×)
9th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
Co. v. United States District Court, 881 F.2d 1486, 1488-91 (9th Cir.1989); see also In Re Cement Antitrust Litigation, 688 F.2d 1297, 1301 (9th Cir.1982) (noting guidelines for granting mandamus), aff'd for lack of quorum, 459 U.S. 1190 , 103 S.Ct. 1173 , 75 L.Ed.2d 425 459 U.S. 1191 , 103 S.Ct. 1173 , 75 L.Ed.2d 425 (1983), issuance of such a writ is appropriate where, as here, a lower court has exceeded its jurisdiction.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Irvin
C.D. Cal. · 1989 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Phoenix Union High School District, 681 F.2d 1235 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1191 , 103 S.Ct. 1169 , 75 L.Ed.2d 422 (1983); Grossman v. Schwarz, 125 F.R.D. 376, 381 (S.D.N.Y.1989); Skibo v. New York, supra, 109 F.R.D. at 64 (E.D.N.Y.1985); see also United States v. Gillock, 445 U.S. 360, 373 , 100 S.Ct. 1185, 1193 , 63 L.Ed.2d 454 (1980).
cited Cited "see, e.g." In Re B & W Management, Inc.
D.D.C. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also In re Cement Anti-Trust Litigation, 688 F.2d 1297, 1308 (9th Cir.1982), aff'd 459 U.S. 1191 , 103 S.Ct. 1173 , 75 L.Ed.2d 425 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Claus Von Bulow, Martha Von Bulow, by Her Next Friends Alexander Auersperg, and Annie Laurie Auersperg-Kneissl v. Claus Von Bulow
2d Cir. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also In re Cement Antitrust Litig., 688 F.2d 1297, 1304 (9th Cir.1982) (“[W]e are faced with the need to resolve a *98 significant question of first impression where the failure to do so may adversely affect the efficient operation of the district courts.”), aff'd by absence of quorum pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2109 , 459 U.S. 1191 , 103 S.Ct. 1173 , 75 L.Ed.2d 425 (1983).
Arizona
v.
United States District Court for the District of Arizona (Kaiser Cement & Gypsum Corp. , Real Parties in Interest)
No. 82-675.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1983.
459 U.S. 1191
Cited by 55 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 9th Cir. Four Members of the Court have disqualified themselves in this case. Because of this absence of a quorum, 28 U. S. C. § 1, and since a majority of the qualified Justices are of the opinion that the case cannot be heard and determined at the next Term of Court, the judgment and order are affirmed under 28 U. S. C. §2109, which provides that under these circumstances “the court shall enter its order affirming the judgment of the court from which the case was brought for review with the same effect as upon affirmance by an equally divided court.”