green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
10.5 score
“he finality requirement does not necessarily demand the ministerial act of executing a judgment.”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 31 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Byrd v. Armontrout
Cf. Walker v. Lockhart, 763 F.2d 942 (8th Cir. en banc 1985), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ____, 106 S.Ct. 3332 , 92 L.Ed.2d 738 (1986); but cf. id. at 962 (dissent). [11] Likewise, because an evidentiary hearing is required in a federal habeas corpus proceeding only if "the petitioner's allegations, if proven, would establish the right to his release," Jensen v. Satran, 651 F.2d 605, 608 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1007 , 103 *761 S.Ct. 1244, 75 L.Ed.2d 475 (1983), accord Edgemon v. Lockhart, 768 F.2d 252, 255 (8th Cir.1985), an evidentiary hearing on petitioner's claim for relief based …
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
1031 Canal Development, LLC v. National Fire & Marine Insurance Company
he finality requirement does not necessarily demand the ministerial act of executing a judgment.
cited
Cited "see"
Welsh v. Lamb County
See Chemetron Corp. v. Business Funds, Inc., 682 F.2d 1149, 1194 (Sth Cir. 1982) (citation omitted), vacated on unrelated grounds by 460 U.S. 1007 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jaycox v. Pyle
See Chemetron Corp. v. Business Funds, Inc., 682 F.2d 1149, 1194 (5th Cir. 1982) (citation omitted), vacated on unrelated grounds by 460 U.S. 1007 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Mangwiro v. Napolitano
See Chemetron Corp. v. Business Funds, Inc., 682 F.2d 1149, 1194 (5th Cir.1982), vacated on other grounds by 460 U.S. 1007 , 103 S.Ct. 1245 , 75 L.Ed.2d 476 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
E.B. Harper & Company, Incorporated v. Nortek, Incorporated
See Chemetron Corp. v. Business Funds, Inc., 682 F.2d 1149, 1190-91 (5th Cir.1982), vacated on other grounds, 460 U.S. 1007 , 103 S.Ct. 1245 , 75 L.Ed.2d 476 (1983); Wellons, Inc. v. T.E.
cited
Cited "see"
Toppins v. Newsom
See Chemetron Corp. v. Business Funds, Inc., 682 F.2d 1149, 1193-94 (5th Cir. 1982), vacated on other grounds, 460 U.S. 1007 (1983) (futility of amendment one reason to deny leave to amend).
discussed
Cited "see"
Haynsworth v. Lloyd's of London
See Industrial Development Corp. v. Mitsui & Co., 671 F.2d 876 (5th Cir.1982), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 460 U.S. 1007 , 103 S.Ct. 1244 , 75 L.Ed.2d 475 (1988) (involving allegations of U.S. antitrust issues, the court said that “to determine Indonesia to be the proper forum ... would, in effect, deprive plaintiffs of all remedy,” assuming that Indonesia would not enforce the foreign antitrust laws).
discussed
Cited "see"
Randall S. Whitmore v. David Avery, Superintendent, Community Corrections Center
(2×)
Accord, e.g., Jensen v. Satran, 651 F.2d 605 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1007 , 103 S.Ct. 1244 , 75 L.Ed.2d 475 (1983); Wallace v. Lockhart, 701 F.2d 719, 730 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 934 , 104 S.Ct. 340 , 78 L.Ed.2d 308 (1983); Spillers v. Lockhart, 802 F.2d 1007, 1009 (8th Cir.1986). 17 Schlup reinforces the importance of deciding procedural bar issues only with the benefit of properly developed factual records.
discussed
Cited "see"
ca5 1990
See Chemetron Corp. v. Business Funds, Inc., 682 F.2d 1149 (5th Cir.1982), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 460 U.S. 1007 , 103 S.Ct. 1245 , 75 L.Ed.2d 476 adhering to prior opinion on remand, 718 F.2d 725 (5th Cir.), reh'g en banc ordered, 718 F.2d 725, 730 (5th Cir.1983)(settled prior to rehearing en banc). 3 The Court noted that a section 9(a) claim requires proof of effect on the purchase price, and that in the case before it relief under section 9(a) was foreclosed by the jury's failure to find such effect.
discussed
Cited "see"
Jolley v. Welch
See Chemetron Corp. v. Business Funds, Inc., 682 F.2d 1149 (5th Cir.1982), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 460 U.S. 1007 , 108 S.Ct. 1245 , 75 L.Ed.2d 476 adhering to prior opinion on remand, 718 F.2d 725 (5th Cir.), reh’g en banc ordered, 718 F.2d 725, 730 (5th Cir.1983)(settled prior to rehearing en banc). 3 The Court noted that a section 9(a) claim requires proof of effect on the purchase price, and that in the ease before it relief under section 9(a) was foreclosed by the jury’s failure to find such effect.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wellons, Inc., a Corporation v. T.E. Ibberson Company and Ibberson Engineering, Inc., Formerly Known as Kibcor Engineering, Inc., Corporations
See Chemetron Corp. v. Business Funds, Inc., 682 F.2d 1149, 1191-92 (5th Cir.1982), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 460 U.S. 1007 , 103 S.Ct. 1245 , 75 L.Ed.2d 476 (1983), initial opinion adhered to on remand, 718 F.2d 725 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1013 , 103 S.Ct. 1254 , 75 L.Ed.2d 483 (1983) (plaintiff, not a party to prior suit, can invoke offensive collateral estoppel against defendant when prior case has been fully litigated but settled before entry of final judgment).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca3 1988
See District Court Memorandum and Order n. 1 (August 29, 1988) (citing Industrial Investment Development v. Mitsui, 671 F.2d 876, 884-85, n. 7 (5th Cir.1982) vacated on other grounds 460 U.S. 1007 , 103 S.Ct. 1244 , 75 L.Ed.2d 475 (1983)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Industrial Investment Development Corp. v. Mitsui & Co.
See District Court Memorandum and Order n. 1 (August 29, 1988) (citing Industrial Investment Development v. Mitsui, 671 F.2d 876, 884-85, n. 7 (5th Cir.1982) vacated on other grounds 460 U.S. 1007 , 103 S.Ct. 1244 , 75 L.Ed.2d 475 (1983)).
cited
Cited "see"
Tausevich v. Board of Appeals of Stoughton
See Chemetron Corp. v. Business Funds, Inc., 682 F.2d 1149, 1187 (5th Cir. 1982), judgment vacated on other grounds, 460 U.S. 1007 , and cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gregory A. Ivey v. George Wilson, Ron Hanley, Lt. Barnes, Robert Hendricks, Dewey Sowders, Capt. Barnett, Phil Parker, Andy Knight, and Tom Stewart
(2×)
Ivey also contends that the insufficiency of the evidence violates due process. “[T]he requirement of impartiality mandates the disqualification of an official who is directly involved in the incident or is otherwise substantially involved in the incident but does not require the disqualification of someone tangentially involved.” Merritt v. De Los Santos, 721 F.2d 598, 601 (7th Cir.1983); see Jensen v. Satran, 688 F.2d 76, 78 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1007 , 103 S.Ct. 1244 , 75 L.Ed.2d 475 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Adams v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
See 460 U.S. 1007 , 103 S.Ct. 1244 , 75 L.Ed.2d 475 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Lewis v. Holden
See Chemetron Corp. v. Business Funds, Inc., 682 F.2d 1149, 1178 (5th Cir.1982), vacated on other grounds, 460 U.S. 1007 , 103 S.Ct. 1245 , 75 L.Ed.2d 476 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Lewis v. Holden
See Chemetron Corp. v. Business Funds, Inc., 682 F.2d 1149, 1178 (5th Cir.1982), vacated on other grounds, 460 U.S. 1007 , 103 S.Ct. 1245 , 75 L.Ed.2d 476 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rooney Pace, Inc. v. Reid
See Chemetron Corp. v. Business Funds, Inc., 682 F.2d 1149 (5th Cir.1982), vacated, 460 U.S. 1007 , 103 S.Ct. 1245 , 75 L.Ed.2d 476 (mem.), on remand, 718 F.2d 725 (1983); Crane Co. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co., 419 F.2d 787 (2d Cir.1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 822 , 91 S.Ct. 41 , 27 L.Ed.2d 50 (1970); SEC v. Resch-Cassin & Co., Inc., 362 F.Supp. 964 (S.D.N.Y.1973).
examined
Cited "see"
Frank J. Ostrofe v. H.S. Crocker Company, Inc.
(4×)
See 460 U.S. 1007 , 103 S.Ct. 1244 , 75 L.Ed.2d 475 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mack v. Newton
See generally Chemetron Corp. v. Business Funds, Inc., 682 F.2d 1149, 1171-72 (5th Cir.1982), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 460 U.S. 1007 , 103 S.Ct. 1245 , 75 L.Ed.2d 476 (1983), rehearing en banc granted following remand, 718 F.2d 725, 730 (5th Cir.1983); Custom Leasing, Inc. v. Texas Bank & Trust Co. of Dallas, 516 S.W.2d 138, 143 (Tex.1974); Sawyer v. Pierce, 580 S.W.2d 117, 124 (Tex.Civ.App. — Corpus Christi 1979, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Yarborough v. Back, 561 S.W.2d 593, 595 (Tex.Civ.App.— Amarillo 1978, no writ). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Laker Airways Ltd. v. Sabena, Belgian World Airlines
See Industrial Development Corp. v. Mitsui & Co., 671 F.2d 876, 884-85 (5th Cir.1982), vacated on other grounds, 460 U.S. 1007 , 103 S.Ct. 1244 , 75 L.Ed.2d 475 (1983) (applying interest balancing to conclude that lower court erred in dismissing on jurisdictional grounds); United States v. Veteo, Inc., 691 F.2d 1281 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1098 , 102 S.Ct. 671 , 70 L.Ed.2d 639 (1981); Daishowa Int'l v. North Coast Export Co., 1982-2 Trade Cas. ¶ 64,774 (N.D.Cal.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lowe v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc.
See, e.g., Chemetron Corp. v. Business Funds, Inc., 682 F.2d 1149, 1161-62 (5th Cir.1982) (§ 9(a), as enforced through § 9(e), requires action for the purpose of inducing a sale or purchase of a security on which the plaintiff relied and which affected the plaintiffs purchase or selling price), rev’d on other grounds, 460 U.S. 1007 , 103 S.Ct. 1245 , 75 L.Ed.2d 476 (1983); Atlantic Fed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Panfil v. ACC CORP.
See also Chemetron Corp. v. Business Funds, Inc., 682 F.2d 1149, 1160-63 (5th Cir.1982), vacated on other grounds, 460 U.S. 1007 , 103 S.Ct. 1245 , 75 L.Ed.2d 476 (1983), on remand, 718 F.2d 725, 728 (5th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arvin Industries v. Wanandi
See, e.g., Chemetron Corp. v. Business Funds, Inc., 682 F.2d 1149, 1161-62 (5th Cir.1982) (Section 9(a), as enforced through 9(e), requires action for the purpose of inducing a sale or purchase of a security on which the plaintiff relied and that affected the plaintiffs purchase or selling price), rev’d and remanded on other grounds, 460 U.S. 1007 , 103 S.Ct. 1245 , 75 L.Ed.2d 476 (1983); Atlantic Federal Savings & Loan v. Dade Savings & Loan, 592 F.Supp. 1089, 1092 (S.D.Fla.1984) (Section 9(a) requires a purchaser or seller); Richardson v. Shearson/American Express Co., 573 F.Supp. 133, 135…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Keith v. Volpe
Atkins v. Reiten, 313 F.2d 673, 675 (9th Cir.1963); see also Chemetron Corp. v. Business Funds, Inc., 682 F.2d 1149, 1193 (5th Cir.1982), vacated on other grounds, 460 U.S. 1007 , 103 S.Ct. 1245 , 75 L.Ed.2d 476 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca9 1988
Atkins v. Reiten, 313 F.2d 673, 675 (9th Cir.1963); see also Chemetron Corp. v. Business Funds, Inc., 682 F.2d 1149, 1193 (5th Cir.1982), vacated on other grounds, 460 U.S. 1007 , 103 S.Ct. 1245 , 75 L.Ed.2d 476 (1983). 22 Rule 15(d) is intended to give district courts broad discretion in allowing supplemental pleadings.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Consolidated Metal Products, Inc. v. American Petroleum Institute
See also Industrial Investment Development Corp. v. Mitsui & Co., 671 F.2d 876, 884 (5th Cir.1982), vacated on other grounds, 460 U.S. 1007 , 103 S.Ct. 1244 , 75 L.Ed.2d 475 (1983), concluding that summary judgment is inappropriate against antitrust plaintiffs "where there is ample evidence of a conspiracy” and when "plaintiffs have not had an opportunity to depose one of the conspirators on the effect and intent of their efforts".
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Zlotnick v. Tie Communications
See e.g., Chemetron Corp. v. Business Funds, Inc., 682 F.2d 1149 , 1162 n. 20 (5th Cir.1982) vacated and remanded on other grounds, 460 U.S. 1007 , 103 S.Ct. 1245 , 75 L.Ed.2d 476 (1983).
Berg
v.
Wisconsin
v.
Wisconsin
No. 82-1175.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 28, 1983.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. Louisiana (1)
Appeal from Ct. App. Wis. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.