green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.8 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Garland Independent School District v. Wilks
cjompliance with these procedural safeguards is an essential step in achieving the statutory goal of a free appropriate public education.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mrs. W. v. Tirozzi
See Quackenbush v. Johnson City School Dist., 716 F.2d 141 , 147-48 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1071 , 104 S.Ct. 1426 , 79 L.Ed.2d 750 (1984) (allowing § 1983 action when state directly responsible for plaintiff’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies); see generally Cain v. Yukon Pub.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mrs. W. v. Tirozzi
See Quackenbush v. Johnson City School Dist., 716 F.2d 141 , 147-48 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1071 , 104 S.Ct. 1426 , 79 L.Ed.2d 750 (1984) (allowing Sec. 1983 action when state directly responsible for plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies); see generally Cain v. Yukon Pub.
discussed
Cited "see"
The Kansas City Southern Railway Co., Cross v. Shirley McNamara Secretary of the Dept. Of Revenue and Taxation, State of Louisiana, Cross-Appellee
See Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. Bair, 338 N.W.2d 338 (Iowa 1983) (comparing state tax on railroad fuel to fuel taxes on three competitive modes of transportation), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1071 , 104 S.Ct. 1427 , 79 L.Ed.2d 751 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jesse James Jackson v. Charles C. Scully, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility
See Hutchins v. Wainwright, 715 F.2d 512, 519 (11th Cir.1983) (substance of petitioner’s claim, although obliquely stated, was sufficient to alert state court to confrontation issue where type of situation was “exactly what the confrontation clause is designed to prohibit”), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1071 , 104 S.Ct. 1427 , 79 L.Ed.2d 751 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bryan Kirby Barrett, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Gerardo Acevedo, Appellant/cross-Appellee
(2×)
By repeatedly challenging his lack of opportunity for cross-examination, Barrett directed the state court's attention to his federal constitutional right to confront and cross-examine his accusers. 4 17 In Morrow v. Wyrick, 646 F.2d 1229 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 899 , 102 S.Ct. 401 , 70 L.Ed.2d 216 (1981), the court concluded that the confrontation claim had been fairly presented because, although petitioner's brief was "admittedly not a model of legal drafting ..., [his] basic argument that the introduction of the challenged testimony deprived him of the right to confront and cross-…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bryan Kirby Barrett v. Gerardo Acevedo
In Ashker, the court held that the petitioner did not exhaust his confrontation clause claim by arguing in state court that he was denied his constitutional right to a fair trial under the Fourteenth Amendment because of the introduction of hearsay evidence. 5 F.3d at 1179 . -7- In Morrow v. Wyrick, 646 F.2d 1229 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 899 (1981), the court concluded that the confrontation claim had been fairly presented because, although petitioner's brief was "admittedly not a model of legal drafting . . ., [his] basic argument that the introduction of the challenged testimony de…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Crocker v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Ass'n
Deprivation of a Right Created by Federal Law or Regulation The Education of the Handicapped Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 , et seq., is a comprehensive statute enacted to assist the states in providing handicapped children with a “free appropriate public education." To accomplish that goal, the EHA provides federal funding to state and local educational agencies to be used for educating handicapped children. 20 U.S.C. § 1411 ; See also, Quackenbush v. Johnson City School Dist., 716 F.2d 141 , 145, cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1071 , 104 S.Ct. 1426 , 79 L.Ed.2d 750 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mrs. W. v. Tirozzi
To accomplish that goal, the EHA provides federal funding to state and local educational agencies to be used for educating handicapped children. 20 U.S.C. § 1411 ; see also Quackenbush v. Johnson City School Dist., 716 F.2d 141 , 145 (2d Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1071 , 104 S.Ct. 1426 , 79 L.Ed.2d 750 (1984).
Johnson City Central School District
v.
Quackenbush
v.
Quackenbush
No. 83-835.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 27, 1984.
C. A. 2d Cir. Motion of Western New York Disability Law Coalition for leave to file a brief as ami-cus curiae granted. Certiorari denied.