green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
11.2 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1995 ·
…but-for" test may not be equated with "proximate cause
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 30 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.
dministrators, and even judges, may hold policy views on questions of law prior to participating in a proceeding
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Rite-Hite Corporation v. Kelley Company, Inc.
(2×)
but-for" test may not be equated with "proximate cause
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co.
(2×)
but-for" test may not be equated with "proximate cause
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Metro Mobile CTS, Inc. v. Newvector Communications, Inc.
a predominant market share may merely be the result of regulation____
cited
Cited "see"
Presbyterian University Hospital v. Wilson
See Cubbage v. Merchent, 744 F.2d 665 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1005 , 105 S.Ct. 1359 , 84 L.Ed.2d 380 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
L.H. Carbide Corp. v. Piece Maker Co.
See, Cubbage v. Merchent, 744 F.2d 665 (9th Cir.1984) (holding that although during a four (4) month period approximately twenty-six percent (26%) of an Arizona hospital's patients were from California and an Arizona doctor saw roughly one-hundred twenty (120) patients per week, of whom about twelve percent (12%) were California residents, no general personal jurisdiction existed over hospital or doctor in California the court), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1005 , 105 S.Ct. 1359 , 84 L.Ed.2d 380 (1985). 5 . 28 U.S.C. § 1404 (a) states: For the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest o…
discussed
Cited "see"
Adams v. Hyannis Harborview, Inc.
(2×)
See Davis v. Avco Financial Services, Inc., 739 F.2d 1057, 1068 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1005 , 105 S.Ct. 1359 , 84 L.Ed.2d 381 (1985); Abelson v. Strong, 644 F.Supp. 524, 531 (D.Mass.1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bank of Oklahoma, N.A., Grove Branch, Formerly Bank of Oklahoma Grove v. The Islands Marina, Ltd., an Oklahoma Corporation Charles Gary James Patricia K. James Bank of the Lakes of Langley, Oklahoma Chrysler First Wholesale Credit, Inc. Donzi Credit Corporation First Oklahoma Savings Bank Guaranty National Bank Robert Williams Robert Montgomery First State Bank of Ketchum, Oklahoma Wellcraft Marine, a Division of Genmar, Inc., and First National Bank, and Trust Company of Vinita, Jerry Courtney, Bank of Oklahoma, N.A., Grove Branch, Formerly Bank of Oklahoma Grove v. The Islands Marina, Ltd., an Oklahoma Corporation Charles Gary James Patricia K. James Bank of the Lakes of Langley, Oklahoma Chrysler First Wholesale Credit, Inc. Donzi Credit Corporation First Oklahoma Savings Bank Guaranty National Bank Robert Williams Robert Montgomery First State Bank of Ketchum, Oklahoma Emery Urfer Harris-Kayot, Inc. Wellcraft Marine, a Division of Genmar, Inc., and First National Bank, and Trust Company of Vinita, Jerry Courtney
See Kain v. Winslow Mfg., Inc., 736 F.2d 606, 609 (10th Cir.1984) (issue of subject matter jurisdiction may be raised at any time), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1005 , 105 S.Ct. 1360 , 84 L.Ed.2d 381 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bank of Oklahoma, N.A. v. Islands Marina, Ltd.
See Kain v. Winslow Mfg., Inc., 736 F.2d 606, 609 (10th Cir.1984) (issue of subject matter jurisdiction may be raised at any time), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1005 , 105 S.Ct. 1360 , 84 L.Ed.2d 381 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Caller-Times Publishing Co. v. Triad Communications, Inc.
(2×)
See Southern Pacific Communications Co. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co., 740 F.2d 980, 1006 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1005 , 105 S.Ct. 1359 , 84 L.Ed.2d 380 (1985); Barry Wright Corp. v. ITT Ginnell Corp., 724 F.2d 227, 231-36 (1st Cir.1983); MCI Communications Corp. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co., 708 F.2d 1081 , 1123 n. 59 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 891 , 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983); O.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bernard A. Schlifke and Harvey Kallick, D/B/A K & S Investments Co., a Partnership v. Seafirst Corp. And Seattle-First National Bank
(2×)
See Davis v. AVCO Financial Services, Inc., 739 F.2d 1057 , 1065 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1005 , 105 S.Ct. 1359 , 84 L.Ed.2d 381 (1985) (“But for the presence of the defendant ... in the negotiations preceding the sale, could the sale have been consummated?” (quoting Lennerth v. Mendenhall, 234 F.Supp. 59 (N.D.Ohio 1964))); Croy v. Campbell, 624 F.2d 709, 713 (5th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Indiana State Highway Commission v. Morris
(2×)
Ind.Code §§ 4-6-5-3, -6; see In re Property at Marriott Inn (1983), Ind.App., 456 N.E.2d 444 , cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1005 , 105 S.Ct. 1359 , 84 L.Ed.2d 380 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ocean State Physicians Health Plan, Inc. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield
See Southern Pacific Communications v. American Tel. & Tel., 740 F.2d 980, 1000 (D.C.Cir.1984), (citing (United States v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 351 U.S. 377, 391 , 76 S.Ct. 994, 1005 , 100 L.Ed. 1264 (1956)), cert. denied 470 U.S. 1005 , 105 S.Ct. 1359 , 84 L.Ed.2d 380 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of the Western National Bank of Lovell, Wyoming v. British-American Insurance Company, Ltd.
See Cubbage v. Merchent, 744 F.2d 665, 672 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1005 , 105 S.Ct. 1359 , 84 L.Ed.2d 380 (1985) (noting that because plaintiff was a California resident, California courts would be more accessible to him).
discussed
Cited "see"
Paccar International, Inc. v. Commercial Bank of Kuwait, S.A.K.
Ill CBK’S CONTACTS WITH CALIFORNIA Paccint claims that the district court has “specific jurisdiction” over CBK. 3 In Data Disc, we held that a plaintiff attempting to establish specific jurisdiction must show that three requirements are satisfied: (1) The nonresident defendant must do some act or consummate some transaction with the forum or perform some act by which he purposefully avails himself of the privilege of conducting activities in the forum, thereby invoking the benefits and protections of its laws. (2) The claim must be one which arises out of or results from the defendant’…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rossi v. Standard Roofing, Inc.
See also Southern Pacific Communications Co. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 556 F.Supp. 825, 1090 (D.D.C.1983), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1005 , 105 S.Ct. 1359 , 84 L.Ed.2d 380 (1985) (holding that a “but for” damage model is “fatally deficient” where it provides “no basis for the Court to determine without speculation the amount of damage, if any, caused by any of the particular actions of the defendants”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hill Ex Rel. Hill v. United States
See e.g., Cubbage v. Merchant, 744 F.2d 665 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1005 , 105 S.Ct. 1359 , 84 L.Ed.2d 380 (1985) (jurisdiction proper in California over Arizona doctor who practiced near California border and advertised in California); McGee v. Riekhof, 442 F.Supp. 1276 (D.Mont.1978) (jurisdiction asserted over a Utah doctor on the basis of his phone call from Utah to Montana in which he rendered a negligent diagnosis to his Montana patient).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wright v. National Warranty Company
(2×)
See also Davis v. Avco Financial Services Inc., 739 F.2d 1057, 1068 (6th Cir.) (it is clear that scienter and reliance are not prerequisites for recovery under section 12(2)), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1005 , 105 S.Ct. 1359 , 84 L.Ed.2d 381 (1985); Ballay v. Legg Mason Wood Walker, Inc., 925 F.2d 682, 689 (3rd Cir.1991) (same); Smolen v. Deloitte, Haskins & Sells, 921 F.2d 959, 965 (9th Cir.1990) (same); Sanders v. John Nuveen & Co., Inc., 619 F.2d 1222, 1229 (7th Cir.1980) (plaintiff under section 12(2) is not required to prove due diligence), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1005 , 101 S.Ct. 1719 , 68 L.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wright v. National Warranty Co.
(2×)
See also Davis v. Avco Financial Services Inc., 739 F.2d 1057, 1068 (6th Cir.) (it is clear that scienter and reliance are not prerequisites for recovery under section 12(2)), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1005 , 105 S.Ct. 1359 , 84 L.Ed.2d 381 (1985); Ballay v. Legg Mason Wood Walker, Inc., 925 F.2d 682, 689 (3rd Cir.1991) (same); Smolen v. Deloitte, Haskins & Sells, 921 F.2d 959, 965 (9th Cir.1990) (same); Sanders v. John Nuveen & Co., Inc., 619 F.2d 1222, 1229 (7th Cir.1980) (plaintiff under section 12(2) is not required to prove due diligence), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1005 , 101 S.Ct. 1719 , 68 L.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Riedel v. Acutote of Colorado
(2×)
Id., 486 U.S. at 651 , 108 S.Ct. at 2080 (noting the “deficiency of the substantial-factor test”); see also Mercer, 713 F.Supp. at 1024 (“In light of this criticism, [the substantial-factor test] is no longer good law”) (disapproving of the use of the substantial factor test in Davis v. Avco Financial Services, Inc., 739 F.2d 1057 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1005 , 105 S.Ct. 1359 , 84 L.Ed.2d 381 (1985), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1012 , 105 S.Ct. 2713 , 86 L.Ed.2d 727 (1985) ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
South Carolina National Bank v. Stone
(2×)
See, e.g., Davis v. AVCO Financial Services, Inc., 739 F.2d 1057 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1005 , 105 S.Ct. 1359 , 84 L.Ed.2d 381 (1985) (class certification affirmed even though proof of individual reliance required); Green v. Wolf Corp., 406 F.2d 291, 301 (2d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 977 , 89 S.Ct. 2131 , 23 L.Ed.2d 766 (1969) (“We see no reason why the trial court, if it determines individual reliance is an essential element to proof, cannot order separate trials on that particular issue, as on the question of damages, if necessary.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marsha Lee Kennedy and Stephen Michael Kennedy v. Robert G. Freeman, M.D. And Robert G. Freeman, P.A., a Texas Corporation
See, e.g., Cubbage v. Merchent, 744 F.2d 665 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1005 , 105 S.Ct. 1359 , 84 L.Ed.2d 380 (1985); Pijanowski v. Cleveland Clinic Found., 635 F.Supp. 1435 (E.D.Mich.1986); Lemke v. St.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mercer v. Jaffe, Snider, Raitt and Heuer, PC
(2×)
See also Davis v. Avco Financial Services, Inc., 739 F.2d 1057, 1062 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1005 , 105 S.Ct. 1359 , 84 L.Ed.2d 381 (1985) (section 12(2)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Simpson v. Quality Oil Co., Inc.
See, e.g., Cubbage v. Merchent, 744 F.2d 665, 668 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1005 , 105 S.Ct. 1359 , 84 L.Ed.2d 380 (1985); Cornelison v. Chaney, 16 Cal.3d 143 , 127 Cal.Rptr. 352 , 545 P.2d 264 (1976) (trucker who struck California resident in Nevada while transporting goods to California was subject to specific jurisdiction in California because contacts were “substantially related” to the controversy); Southwire Co. v. Trans-World Metals & Co., 735 F.2d 440, 442 (11th Cir. 1984); and von Mehren & Trautman, Jurisdiction to Adjudicate: A Suggested Analysis, 79 Harv.L.Rev. 1121…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Buford White Lumber Co. Profit Sharing & Savings Plan & Trust v. Octagon Properties, Ltd.
(2×)
See e.g., Davis v. Avco Financial Services, Inc., 739 F.2d 1057, 1067 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1005 , 105 S.Ct. 1359 , 84 L.Ed.2d 381 (1985) (overruled on other grounds in Pinter v. Dahl, see 486 U.S. at 649 n. 25, 108 S.Ct. at 2080 n. 25, 100 L.Ed.2d at 683 n. 25).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Newport Components, Inc. v. NEC Home Electronics (U.S.A.), Inc.
Helicopteros, supra, 446 U.S. at 415, 104 S.Ct. at 1872 , citing Perkins v. Beneqet Consolidated Mining Co., 342 U.S. 437, 445 , 72 S.Ct. 413, 418 , 96 L.Ed. 485 (1952); see also Cubbage v. Merchent, 744 F.2d 665, 667 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, Merchent v. Cubbage, 470 U.S. 1005 , 105 S.Ct. 1359 , 84 L.Ed.2d 380 (1985); Data Disc, supra, 557 F.2d at 1286 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
U.S. Philips Corp. v. Windmere Corp.
See, e.g., Southern Pacific Communications Co. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 556 F.Supp. 825, 964 (D.C.Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 470 U.S. 1005 , 105 S.Ct. 1359 , 84 L.Ed.2d 380 (1985). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marilyn Scott and John Scott v. Don Breeland and the Oak Ridge Boys, Inc.
Data Disc, Inc. v. Systems Technology Associates, 557 F.2d 1280, 1285 (9th Cir.1977); see also Cubbage v. Merchent, 744 F.2d 665, 667 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 1359 , 84 L.Ed.2d 380 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. Group Systems International Far East, Ltd.
See, e.g., Cubbage v. Merchent, 744 F.2d 665, 668-70 (9th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 1359 , 84 L.Ed.2d 380 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Seidel v. Public Service Co. of New Hampshire
(2×)
See, e.g., Davis v. Avco Financial Services, Inc., 739 F.2d 1057, 1063-68 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 1359 , 2713, 84 L.Ed.2d 381 (1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Davis
v.
Avco Financial Services, Inc.
v.
Avco Financial Services, Inc.
No. 84-1087.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 25, 1985.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.