green
Positive treatment
8.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 39 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Refugio Ruiz
See Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(1)(B); but see also United States v. Andrews, 765 F.2d 1491, 1501-02 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1064 , 106 S.Ct. 815 , 88 L.Ed.2d 789 (1986) (analyzing the admissibility of a police officer’s tape-recorded observations alternatively as present sense impressions and prior consistent statements).
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Ruiz, Refugio
See Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(1)(B); but see also United States v. Andrews, 765 F.2d 1491, 1501-02 (11th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1064 , 106 S. Ct. 815 (1986) (analyzing the admissibility of a police officer’s tape-recorded observations alternatively as present sense impressions and prior consistent statements).
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Jose Leonardo Contreras-Subias
But cf. United States v. Lundien, 769 F.2d 981, 987 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1064 , 106 S.Ct. 815 , 88 L.Ed.2d 789 (1986), where the court noted that if enough time passes, an expectation of finality can crystallize even with regard to an illegal sentence.
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Ramirez Jr
United States v. Russo, 741 F.2d 1264, 1267 (11th Cir. 1984) ________________________ (delays of several months sufficient to bar reprosecution even though crime serious), cited with approval in United States v. _____ ____ ________ __ _________________ Hastings, 847 F.2d 920, 929 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. ________ ____ ______ 925 (1988); but cf. United States v. Brown, 770 F.2d 241 , 244 ___ __ ________________________ (1st Cir. 1985) (delay of 35 days not exorbitant when due to failure to anticipate a ruling by court of appeals on legal issue not previously free from doubt as opposed…
discussed
Cited "but see"
Johnny Thomas v. Ernest R. Sutton Attorney General of North Carolina
But see United States v. Earley, 816 F.2d 1428 (10th Cir.1987) (en banc). 7 The approach in this Court is derived from United States v. Bello, supra, and United States v. Lundien, 769 F.2d 981 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied 474 U.S. 1064 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ferguson v. United States
See Graves v. United States, 490 A.2d 1086, 1091 (D.C. 1984) (en banc), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1064 , 106 S.Ct. 814 , 88 L.Ed.2d 788 (1986), overruled in part on other grounds in Sell v. United States, 525 A.2d 1017, 1021 (D.C. 1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Aiken
See United States v. Andrews, 765 F.2d 1491, 1496-1497 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied sub. nom., Royster v. United *1352 States, 474 U.S. 1064 , 106 S.Ct. 815 , 88 L.Ed.2d 789 (1986) (joinder proper where offenses were part of “series of transactions” which were facially similar, and there was substantial overlap of participants who shared same objective and displayed common mode of operation); see also United States v. Friedman, 854 F.2d 535, 561 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 1637 , 104 L.Ed.2d 153 (1989) (“The presence of a substantive RICO count under 18 U.S.C. § …
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ray
See United States v. Lundien, 769 F.2d 981, 987 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1064 , 106 S.Ct. 815 , 88 L.Ed.2d 789 (1986); Thayer, 937 F.Supp. at 667 ; Merritt, 930 F.Supp. at 1115 .
cited
Cited "see"
Lyons v. United States
See Graves v. United States, 490 A.2d 1086, 1098-1101 (D.C.1984) (en banc), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1064 , 106 S.Ct. 814 , 88 L.Ed.2d 788 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Tolson
See Merritt, 930 F.Supp. at 1115 (citing United States v. Lundien, 769 F.2d 981, 987 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1064 , 106 S.Ct. 815 , 88 L.Ed.2d 789 (1986)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Akins v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Treadwell, 245 U.S.App.D.C. 257, 266-67, 760 F.2d 327, 336-37 (1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1064 , 106 S.Ct. 814 , 88 L.Ed.2d 788 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. McCutcheon
See United States v. Andrews, 765 F.2d 1491, 1498 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1064 , 106 S.Ct. 815 , 88 L.Ed.2d 789 (1986) (compelling prejudice does not exist automatically where one defendant asserts an entrapment defense at a joint trial).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lyons v. United States
(2×)
See Graves v. United States, 490 A.2d 1086, 1098-1101 (D.C.1984) (en banc), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1064 , 106 S.Ct. 814 , 88 L.Ed.2d 788 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Guyon
See United ___ ______ States v. Brown, 736 F.2d 807 , 808 n.1 (1st Cir. 1984) (stating ______ _____ that the government's failure to object to court's order of excludable delay resulted in binding the government to the district court's unchallenged computation), appeal after remand, ____________________ 770 F.2d 241 (1st Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1064 (1986). ____________ -7- (1912)); United States v. Lochan, 674 F.2d 960, 967 (1st Cir. _____________ ______ 1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Guyon
See United States v. Brown, 736 F.2d 807 , 808 n. 1 (1984) (stating that the government's failure to object to court’s order of excludable delay resulted in binding the government to the district court’s unchallenged computation), appeal after remand, 770 F.2d 241 (1st Cir.1985), cert. denied, *727 474 U.S. 1064 , 106 S.Ct. 816 , 88 L.Ed.2d 789 (1986). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hutchison
See United States v. Andrews, 765 F.2d 1491, 1500-1501 (11th Cir.1985), reh'g den, 772 F.2d 918 , cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1064 , 106 S.Ct. 815 , 88 L.Ed.2d 789 (1986); Eder v. People, 179 Colo. 122 , 498 P.2d 945, 946 (1972); State v. Nieves, 13 Conn.App. 60 , 534 A.2d 1231, 1232-1233 (1987), cert. denied, 207 Conn. 802 , 540 A.2d 74 (1988); United States v. Mercks, 304 F.2d 771, 772 (4th Cir.1962); People v. Braune, 363 Ill. 551 , 2 N.E.2d 839, 841 (1936); State v. Mason, 215 S.C. 457 , 56 S.E.2d 90, 93 (1949). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Josefa Fernandez Dopico
See United States v. Treadwell, 760 F.2d 327, 339 (D.C.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1064 (1986). 3 The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ralph D. Ferguson
See United States v. Treadwell, 760 F.2d 327, 333 (D.C.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1064 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Iva Burrows v. General Motors Corporation
See United States v. Andrews, 765 F.2d 1491, 1501-02 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1064 (1986); In Re Japanese Elec.
cited
Cited "see"
Lyons v. United States
See Graves v. United States, 490 A.2d 1086, 1098-1101 (D.C.1984) (en banc), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1064 , 106 S.Ct. 814 , 88 L.Ed.2d 788 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ralph Hubert Barger
See United States v. Andrews, 765 F.2d 1491, 1499 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1064 , 106 S.Ct. 815 , 88 L.Ed.2d 789 (1986); United States v. Henciar, 568 F.2d 489, 491 (6th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 953 , 98 S.Ct. 1582 , 55 L.Ed.2d 803 (1978); United States v. Hairrell, 521 F.2d 1264, 1267 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1035 , 96 S.Ct. 568 , 46 L.Ed.2d 409 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ralph Hubert Barger
See United States v. Andrews, 765 F.2d 1491, 1499 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1064 (1986); United States v. Henciar, 568 F.2d 489, 491 (6th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 953 (1978); United States v. Hairrell, 521 F.2d 1264, 1267 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1035 (1975). 52 Therefore, it is clear from the plethora of evidence that the jury could have rationally concluded beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Barger was predisposed to committing the offense.
cited
Cited "see"
White v. State
See United States v. Lun-dien, 769 F.2d 981, 986 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1064 , 106 S.Ct. 815 , 88 L.Ed.2d 789 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rogers
See United States v. Brown, 736 F.2d 807, 809-10 (1st Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1064 , 106 S.Ct. 816 , 88 L.Ed.2d 789 (1986); United States v. Tedesco, 726 F.2d 1216, 1221 (7th Cir.1984); United States v. Stafford, 697 F.2d 1368, 1372-73 (11th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald Rogers A/K/A New York
See United States v. Brown, 736 F.2d 807, 809-10 (1st Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1064 , 106 S.Ct. 816 , 88 L.Ed.2d 789 (1986); United States v. Tedesco, 726 F.2d 1216, 1221 (7th Cir.1984); United States v. Stafford, 697 F.2d 1368, 1372-73 (11th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Raffaele Iennaco
See United States v. Treadwell, 760 F.2d 327, 336 (D.C.Cir.1985) (citing Braverman v. United States, 317 U.S. 49, 53 , 63 S.Ct. 99, 101 , 87 L.Ed. 23 (1942)), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1064 , 106 S.Ct. 814 , 88 L.Ed.2d 788 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Zurla v. State
(2×)
See Graves v. United States, 490 A.2d 1086, 1092 (D.C.App. 1984) (en banc) (recognizing an intermediate category of delay for government actions, including failure to take reasonable means to bring a case to trial, that are deemed more culpable than delay due to court congestion and less culpable than tactical delay), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1064 , 106 S.Ct. 814 , 88 L.Ed.2d 788 rec'd as overruled in part on other grounds, Sell v. United States, 525 A.2d 1017 (D.C.App. 1987) ( Loud Hawk mandates reasonable delay to pursue appeal be treated as justifiable delay); Taylor v. State, 429 So.2d 1172,…
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Walker
(2×)
See United States v. Lundien, 769 F.2d 981 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1064 , 106 S.Ct. 815 , 88 L.Ed.2d 789 (1986). 5 For present purposes, there is no need to determine the precise source and extent of the constitutional protection against disturbing the finality of a sentence.
discussed
Cited "see"
Robinson v. United States
See Graves v. United States, 490 A.2d 1086, 1101-04 (D.C.1984) (en banc), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1064 , 106 S.Ct. 814 , 88 L.Ed.2d 788 (1986). 8 Appellant’s evidentiary challenge to the admission of complainant’s statement to a detective shortly after the rape also fails.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Recognition Equipment, Inc.
See United States v. Treadwell, 760 F.2d 327, 337 (D.C.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1064 , 106 S.Ct. 814 , 88 L.Ed.2d 788 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jeremiah Allen (88-5581) and Willie Taylor (88-5597)
See United States v. Andrews, 765 F.2d 1491, 1501-02 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied sub. nom., 474 U.S. 1064 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dunaway v. Commonwealth
Compare Graves v. United States, 490 A.2d 1086, 1091 (D.C.App.1984) cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1064 , 106 S.Ct. 814 , 88 L.Ed.2d 788 , (1986) (“a delay of more than a year gives prima facie merit” to a claim of denial of speedy trial); State v. Goss, 245 Kan. 189 , 777 P.2d 781, 785 (1989) (delay of “a little over a year” not presumptively prejudicial); Salandre v. State, 111 N.M. 422 , 806 P.2d 562, 568 (1991) (“nine months marks the minimum amount of time that may be considered presump *570 tively prejudicial”); State v. Wilson, 671 A.2d 958, 961 (Me.1996) (seven-month delay not suff…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Humes
Compare United States v. Crawford, 769 F.2d 253, 257-58 (5th Cir.1985) cert. denied sub nom., Waggoner v. United States, 474 U.S. 1103 , 106 S.Ct. 887 , 88 L.Ed.2d 922 (1986) (holding that the defendant was charged with the knowledge that his sentence, if illegally imposed, would be subject to correction under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a) and therefore, he had no expectation of finality in the sentence) with United States v. Jones, 722 F.2d 632, 638-39 (11th Cir.1983) (holding that, unless statutory sentence modification was available as in DiFmncesco, or the defendant deceived the judge in initial sen…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dickerson v. United States
(2×)
See, e.g., Graves v. United States, 490 A.2d 1086, 1090 (D.C.1984) (en bane) (25 months), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1064 , 106 S.Ct. 814 , 88 L.Ed.2d 788 (1986); (Ulysses) Jones v. United States, 483 A.2d 1149 (D.C.1984) (34 months), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1118 , 105 S.Ct. 2363 , 86 L.Ed.2d 263 (1985); Cates v. United States, 379 A.2d 968, 970 (D.C.1977) (59 months).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harvey v. State
(2×)
See also Boardman, 957 F.2d at 1525 and United States v. Lundien, 769 F.2d 981 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied 474 U.S. 1064 , 106 S.Ct. 815 , 88 L.Ed.2d 789 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cox v. State
See also United States v. Andrews , 765 F.2d 1491 , 1500 , rehearing denied, 772 F.2d 918 (11th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, Royster v. United States , 474 U.S. 1064 , 106 S.Ct. 815 , 88 L.Ed.2d 789 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Shirlene Wood, United States of America v. Ronald McKinley Lee, Sr.
Glosser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60, 80 , 62 S.Ct. 457, 469 , 86 L.Ed. 680 (1942) (citation omitted); see also United States v. Treadwell, 760 F.2d 327, 333 (D.C.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1064 , 106 S.Ct. 814 , 88 L.Ed.2d 788 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
White v. State
See also United States v. Andrews , 765 F.2d 1491 , 1500 , rehearing denied, 772 F.2d 918 (11th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, Royster v. United States , 474 U.S. 1064 , 106 S.Ct. 815 , 88 L.Ed.2d 789 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wynn v. United States
See, e.g., Graves v. United States, 490 A.2d 1086, 1091 (D.C.1984) (en banc), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1064 , 106 S.Ct. 814 , 88 L.Ed.2d 788 (1986); Sell v. United States, 525 A.2d 1017, 1019 (D.C.1987); Jackson v. United States, 503 A.2d 1225, 1227 (D.C.1986); Miller v. United States, 479 A.2d 862, 865 (D.C.1984); Parks v. United States, 451 A.2d 591, 600 (D.C.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2123 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983). 7 .
Graves
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 85-5512.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 13, 1986.
Published
Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.