green
Positive treatment
5.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Hermes International v. Lederer De Paris Fifth Avenue, Inc. And Artbag Creations, Inc.
See Defiance Button Machine Co. v. C & C Metal Products Corp., 759 F.2d 1053, 1059 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 844 , 106 S.Ct. 131 , 88 L.Ed.2d 108 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Guyton v. Apfel
See Suarez v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 755 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1985), cert. denied sub nom., Suarez v. Heckler, 474 U.S. 844 , 106 S.Ct. 133 , 88 L.Ed.2d 109 (1985), reh’g denied, 474 U.S. 1097 , 106 S.Ct. 872 , 88 L.Ed.2d 911 (1986); see also Miller v. Shalala, 859 F.Supp. 297, 300 (S.D.Ohio 1994) (citing Suarez in support of the proposition that the “ ‘continuous disability 5 interpretation of the statute appears to be a long-standing policy of the Secretary, and it has been accepted as an appropriate interpretation by numerous courts of appeal”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jim Henson Productions, Inc. v. John T. Brady & Associates, Inc.
See Defiance Button Machine Co. v. C & C Metal Products Corp., 759 F.2d 1053 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 844 , 106 S.Ct. 131 , 88 L.Ed.2d 108 (1985); Marshak v. Green, 746 F.2d 927 (2d Cir.1984). 9 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Dial-A-Mattress Operating Corp. v. Mattress Madness, Inc.
See Defiance Button Machine Co. v. C & C Metal Products Corp., 759 F.2d 1053, 1059-60 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 844 , 106 S.Ct. 131 , 88 L.Ed.2d 108 (1985); Money Store v. Harriscorp Finance, Inc., 689 F.2d 666, 677 (7th Cir.1982); Raufast S.A v. Kicker’s Pizzazz, Ltd., 208 U.S.P.Q. 699 , 702, 1980 WL 30295 (E.D.N.Y.1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Griffin v. Strong
See Hewitt v. City of Truth or Consequences, 758 F.2d 1375, 1379 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 844 , 106 S.Ct. 131 , 88 L.Ed.2d 108 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Griffin v. Strong
See Hewitt v. City of Truth or Consequences, 758 F.2d 1375, 1379 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 844 , 106 S.Ct. 131 , 88 L.Ed.2d 108 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Greenblatt v. Prescription Plan Services Corp.
See Defiance Button Machine Co. v. C & C Metal Products Corp., 759 F.2d 1053, 1063 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 844 , 106 S.Ct. 131 , 88 L.Ed.2d 108 (1985) (if owner of trade secret discloses secret, even inadvertently or accidentally, or if the owner fails to take reasonable precautions to protect the information, information loses the protection of trade secret law).
cited
Cited "see"
Integrated Cash Management Services, Inc. v. Digital Transactions, Inc.
See Defiance Button Machine Co. v. C & C Metal Products Corp., 759 F.2d 1053, 1063 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 844 , 106 S.Ct. 131 , 88 L.Ed.2d 108 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Integrated Cash Management Services, Inc. v. Digital Transactions, Inc.
See Defiance Button Machine Co. v. C & C Metal Products Corp., 759 F.2d 1053, 1063 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 844 , 106 S.Ct. 131 , 88 L.Ed.2d 108 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Business Trends Analysts, Inc. v. Freedonia Group, Inc.
See Defiance Button Machine Co. v. C & C Metal Products Corp., 759 F.2d 1053, 1063 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 844 , 106 S.Ct. 131 , 88 L.Ed.2d 108 (1985); Restatement of Torts § 757, comment b (1939); Delta Filter Corp. v. Morin, 108 A.D.2d 991, 993 , 485 N.Y.S.2d 143, 144-45 (3d Dep’t 1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Murphy Door Bed Co. v. Interior Sleep Systems, Inc.
See Defiance Button Machine Co. v. C & C Metal Products Corp., 759 F.2d 1053, 1061 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 844 , 106 S.Ct. 131 , 88 L.Ed.2d 108 (1985); Wallpaper Manufacturers, Ltd. v. Crown Wall-covering Corp., 680 F.2d 755 , 766 n. 13 (C.C.P.A.1982); DuPont Cellophane Co., Inc. v. Waxed Products Co., Inc., 6 F.Supp. 859, 881 (E.D.N.Y.1934) (the court having found that “plaintiff has established a genuine trade-mark, therefore the defendant cannot pass the burden to the plaintiff; but defendant having interposed the defense of abandonment, it must prove it.”), modified, 85 F.2d …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ricci v. Apfel
See, e.g., Suarez v. Sec’y of Health and Human Servs., 755 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 844 , 106 S.Ct. 133 , 88 L.Ed.2d 109 (1985), and reh’g denied, 474 U.S. 1097 , 106 S.Ct. 872 , 88 L.Ed.2d 911 (1986); Reading v. Mathews, 542 F.2d 993, 997 (7th Cir.1976); Futernick v. Richardson, 484 F.2d 647, 648 (6th Cir.1973); Reyes v. Sec’y of Health, Educ. and Welfare, 476 F.2d 910, 914 (D.C.Cir.1973).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Elm City Cheese Co. v. Federico
See, e.g., Defiance Button Machine Co. v. C & C Metal Products Corp., 759 F.2d 1053 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 844 , 106 S. Ct. 131 , 88 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca9 1996
See, e.g., Suarez v. Secretary of Health and Human Servs., 755 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 844 , 106 S.Ct. 133 , 88 L.Ed.2d 109 (1985), and reh'g denied, 474 U.S. 1097 , 106 S.Ct. 872 , 88 L.Ed.2d 911 (1986); Reading v. Mathews, 542 F.2d 993, 997 (7th Cir.1976); Futernick v. Richardson, 484 F.2d 647, 648 (6th Cir.1973); Reyes v. Secretary of Health, Educ. and Welfare, 476 F.2d 910, 914 (D.C.Cir.1973). 17 Although Smolen did not apply for disabled child's benefits until March 1988, the ALJ who considered Smolen's application on rehearing thought the period during which she …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smolen v. Chater
See, e.g., Suarez v. Secretary of Health and Human Servs., 755 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 844 , 106 S.Ct. 133 , 88 L.Ed.2d 109 (1985), and reh’g denied, 474 U.S. 1097 , 106 S.Ct. 872 , 88 L.Ed.2d 911 (1986); Reading v. Mathews, 542 F.2d 993, 997 (7th Cir.1976); Futernick v. Richardson, 484 F.2d 647, 648 (6th Cir.1973); Reyes v. Secretary of Health, Educ. and Welfare, 476 F.2d 910, 914 (D.C.Cir.1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Miller v. Shalala
See, e.g., Suarez v. Secretary of HHS, 755 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 844 , 106 S.Ct. 133 , 88 L.Ed.2d 109 (1985) and cases cited therein (including decisions from the District of Columbia and Seventh Circuits, as well as Futernick, supra); see also Kidda v. Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, 769 F.2d 165 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1096 , 106 S.Ct. 1494 , 89 L.Ed.2d 896 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Major League Baseball Properties, Inc. v. Sed Non Olet Denarius, Ltd.
See, e.g., Defiance Button Machine Co. v. C & C Metal Products Corp., 759 F.2d 1053, 1059 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 844 , 106 S.Ct. 131 , 88 L.Ed.2d 108 (1985) (no abandonment where cessation of business was involuntary); American International Group, Inc. v. American International Airways, Inc., 726 F.Supp. 1470 (E.D.Pa.1989) (where airline declared bankruptcy, remaining goodwill and lack of intent to abandon precluded finding abandonment). *1129 (citing Defiance, supra).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hammontree v. City Of Buffalo
In doing so we have applied substantive due process standards to the facts and allegations surrounding the pursuit of Hammontree, see Medina v. The City and County of Denver, 960 F.2d 1493 (10th Cir.1992), and authorities collected therein; see also Hewitt v. City of Truth or Consequences, 758 F.2d 1375, 1378-79 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 844 (1985); and the Fourth Amendment's objective reasonableness standard to Hammontree's alleged wrongful seizure and excessive force claims, see Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 , (1989); Dixon v. Richer, 922 F.2d 1456, 1460-62 (10th Cir.1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Donald Frohmader v. Deputy D. Wayne
See, e.g., Hewitt v. City of Truth or Consequences, 758 F.2d 1375, 1378-79 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 844 , 106 S.Ct. 131 , 88 L.Ed.2d 108 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Austin v. Hamilton
Consequently, the substantive due process principles that in the past generally governed claims for post-arrest, pretrial violence or abuse, see Trujillo, 825 F.2d at 1458 ; see, e.g., Hewitt v. City of Truth or Consequences, 758 F.2d 1375, 1378-79 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 844 , 106 S.Ct. 131 , 88 L.Ed.2d 108 (1985), provide the appropriate yardstick for the evaluation of defendants’ claim of qualified immunity for their post-arrest conduct.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Austin v. Hamilton
Consequently, the substantive due process principles that in the past generally governed claims for post-arrest, pretrial violence or abuse, see Trujillo, 825 F.2d at 1458 ; see, e.g., Hewitt v. City of Truth or Consequences, 758 F.2d 1375, 1378-79 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 844 , 106 S.Ct. 131 , 88 L.Ed.2d 108 (1985), provide the appropriate yardstick for the evaluation of defendants' claim of qualified immunity for their post-arrest conduct. 22 To summarize, then, the following standards apply to plaintiffs' excessive force allegations and the individual defendants' correlative asse…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca10 1990
See also Hewitt v. City of Truth or Consequences, 758 F.2d 1375, 1379-80 (10th Cir.) (negligent conduct not constituting abuse of official power), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 844 , 106 S.Ct. 131 , 88 L.Ed.2d 108 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Apodaca v. Rio Arriba County Sheriff's Department
See also Hewitt v. City of Truth or Consequences, 758 F.2d 1375, 1379-80 (10th Cir.) (negligent conduct not constituting abuse of official power), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 844 , 106 S.Ct. 131 , 88 L.Ed.2d 108 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mitchell v. City of Sapulpa
See, e.g., Hewitt v. City of Truth or Consequences, 758 F.2d 1375, 1379 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 844 , 106 S.Ct. 131 , 88 L.Ed.2d 108 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mitchell v. City Of Sapulpa
See, e.g., Hewitt v. City of Truth or Consequences, 758 F.2d 1375, 1379 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 844 , 106 S.Ct. 131 , 88 L.Ed.2d 108 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FED. OF AM. v. Problem Pregnancy
Compare Freedom Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Way, 757 F.2d 1176, 1183 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 844 (1985) (primary word was weak and logos were different).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. v. Problem Pregnancy of Worcester, Inc.
Compare Freedom Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Way, 757 F.2d 1176, 1183 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 844 (1985) (primary word was weak and logos were different).
C & C Metal Products Corp.
v.
Defiance Button Machine Co.
v.
Defiance Button Machine Co.
No. 85-32.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1985.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.