green
Positive treatment
8.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 31 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Severa
See United States v. Kimmel, 777 F.2d 290, 295 (5th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1104 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re West Chicago Thorium Tailings Consolidated Pretrial Proceeding
See Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corporation, 485 F.Supp. 566 (W.D.Okla.1979), aff'd in part and rev’d in part, 667 F.2d 908 (10th Cir.1981), rev’d and remanded, 464 U.S. 238 , 104 S.Ct. 615 , 78 L.Ed.2d 443 (1984), on remand, 769 F.2d 1451 (10th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1104 , 106 S.Ct. 1947 , 90 L.Ed.2d 356 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. General Motors Corp.
See Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp., 769 F.2d 1451, 1455 (10th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1104 , 106 S.Ct. 1947 , 90 L.Ed.2d 356 (1986); Taylor v. National Trailer Convoy, Inc., 433 F.2d 569, 571-72 (10th Cir.1970). 13 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald C. Brechtel and Phillip H. Gattuso
See United States v. Kimmel, 777 F.2d 290 (5th Cir.1985) (approving jury instruction permitting inference that defendant intended natural and probable consequences of knowing act), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1104 , 106 S.Ct. 1947 , 90 L.Ed.2d 357 (1986); Hykel (evidence that defendant failed to disclose and actively concealed interest in mortgage agreement supported finding of intent to defraud under § 1006). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Continental Trend Resources, Inc. v. Oxy USA, Inc.
(2×)
See Spaeth v. Union Oil Co., 762 F.2d 865, 866-67 (10th Cir. 1985) (appeal after remand), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1104 , 106 S.Ct. 1946 , 90 L.Ed.2d 356 (1986)).
cited
Cited "see"
Williams Enterprises, Inc., and Strait Manufacturing and Welding, Inc. v. The Sherman R. Smoot Company
See Massman Construction Co. v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 769 F.2d 1114, 1125 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1104 , 106 S.Ct. 1947 , 90 L.Ed.2d 357 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
John A. Henry & Co., Ltd. v. T.G. & Y. Stores Co. McCrory Corporation Sterik Co., and John A. Henry, Iii, an Individual, Counterclaim-Defendant
See Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp., 769 F.2d 1451, 1460-61 (10th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1104 , 106 S.Ct. 1947 , 90 L.Ed.2d 356 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Connie Clark (90-3153) and Cliffton Clark (90-3312)
See United States v. Moeckly, 769 F.2d 453, 463-64 (8th Cir.1985), cert. denied 476 U.S. 1104 , 106 S.Ct. 1947 , 90 L.Ed.2d 357 (1986), United States v. Cagnina, 697 F.2d 915, 922-23 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied 464 U.S. 856 , 104 S.Ct. 175 , 78 L.Ed.2d 157 (1983) (Court transcripts are not “in possession” of the United States for Jencks Act purposes).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Samuel Duncan, Jr., Grace Duncan, Gay Nell Duncan, Marshall Sutton, Angela F. Turner, Arthur D. Wilson, and Oscar L. Wilson
See United States v. Kimmel, 111 F.2d 290, 293 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1104 , 106 S.Ct. 1947 , 90 L.Ed.2d 357 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca8 1990
See generally Nimrod Marketing (Overseas) Ltd. v. Texas Energy Investment Corp., 769 F.2d 1076, 1080 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1047 , 106 S.Ct. 1266 , 89 L.Ed.2d 575 , and 476 U.S. 1104 , 106 S.Ct. 1948 , 90 L.Ed.2d 357 (1986); Restatement (Second) of Contracts Sec. 90(1) (1981); M.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Luis Carlos Martinez
See United States v. Moeckly, 769 F.2d 453, 461 (8th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 476 U.S. 1104 , 106 S.Ct. 1947 , 90 L.Ed.2d 357 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Midamar Corp.v. National-Ben Franklin Insurance Co. of Illinois
See generally Nimrod Marketing (Overseas) Ltd. v. Texas Energy Investment Corp., 769 F.2d 1076, 1080 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1047 , 106 S.Ct. 1266 , 89 L.Ed.2d 575 , and 476 U.S. 1104 , 106 S.Ct. 1948 , 90 L.Ed.2d 357 (1986); Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 90(1) (1981); M.
discussed
Cited "see"
Isbell v. Smith
See Coleman v. Steel City Crane Rentals, Inc., 475 So.2d 498 (Ala.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1104 , 106 S.Ct. 1946 , 90 L.Ed.2d 356 reh'g denied, 477 U.S. 909 , 106 S.Ct. 3287 , 91 L.Ed.2d 575 (1986); Long Lewis Hardware Co. v. Lightsey, 392 So.2d 545 (Ala.Civ.App.1980), cert. denied, 392 So.2d 548 (Ala. 1981); M.C.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kurt Stewart
See United States v. Moeckly, 769 F.2d 453, 460-61 (8th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1104 , 106 S.Ct. 1947 , 90 L.Ed.2d 357 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Pillsbury Co. v. Midland Enterprises, Inc.
See Massman Construction Co. v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 769 F.2d 1114, 1116 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1104 , 106 S.Ct. 1947 , 90 L.Ed.2d 357 (1986). 14 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Arch Emmett Graham
See United States v. Kimmel, 777 F.2d 290 (5th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 476 U.S. 1104 , 106 S.Ct. *993 1947, 90 L.Ed.2d 357 (1986). 9 We considered Franklin and held that although “the Supreme .Court and we have struggled often with inferred intent instructions, that given here is clearly acceptable and we are duty bound to follow the law approving its use.” 777 F.2d at 292 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Phelix Roberts
See United States v. Moeckly, 769 F.2d 458, 464 (8th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1104 , 106 S.Ct. 1947 , 90 L.Ed.2d 357 (1986); see also United States v. Echeverry, 759 F.2d 1451, 1456 (9th Cir. 1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robinson v. State
(2×)
See Bruce v. State, 318 Md. at 726 , 569 A.2d 1254 ; see also United States v. Moeckly, 769 F.2d 453, 463 (8 th Cir.1985) (Jencks Act does not apply to statements made to state officials when there is "no joint investigation or cooperation with federal authorities"), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1104 , 106 S.Ct. 1947 , 90 L.Ed.2d 357 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robinson v. State
See Bruce v. State, 318 Md. at 726 , 569 A.2d 1254 ; see also United States v. Moeckly, 769 F.2d 453, 463 (8th Cir.1985)(Jencks Act does not apply to statements made to state officials when there is “no joint investigation or cooperation with federal authorities”), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1104 , 106 S.Ct. 1947 , 90 L.Ed.2d 357 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Volb v. G.E. Capital Corp.
(2×)
See, e.g., Coleman v. Steel City Crane Rentals, Inc., 475 So.2d 498 (Ala.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1104 , 106 S.Ct. 1946 , 90 L.Ed.2d 356 (1986); Hoffman v. Wells, 260 Ga. 588 , 397 S.E.2d 696 (1990); Nakagawa v. Apana, 52 Haw. 379 , 477 P.2d 611 (1970); Mainella v. Staff Builders Indus.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Continental Trend Resources, Inc. v. OXY Usa Inc.
Although OXY acknowledges that the financial condition of a defendant is relevant, see Rodebush v. Oklahoma Nursing Homes, Ltd., 867 P.2d 1241, 1251 (Okla.1993); Mitchell v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 688 P.2d 42, 46 (Okla.1984); see also Spaeth v. Union Oil Co., 710 F.2d 1455, 1460 (10th Cir.1983), appeal after remand, 762 F.2d 865 (10th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1104 , 106 S.Ct. 1946 , 90 L.Ed.2d 356 (1986), it argues that the jury instruction unfairly singled out wealth and followed an inflammatory closing argument.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca10 1995
Although OXY acknowledges that the financial condition of a defendant is relevant, see Rodebush v. Oklahoma Nursing Homes, Ltd., 867 P.2d 1241, 1251 (Okla.1993); Mitchell v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 688 P.2d 42, 46 (Okla.1984); see also Spaeth v. Union Oil Co., 710 F.2d 1455, 1460 (10th Cir.1983), appeal after remand, 762 F.2d 865 (10th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1104 , 106 S.Ct. 1946 , 90 L.Ed.2d 356 (1986), it argues that the jury instruction unfairly singled out wealth and followed an inflammatory closing argument.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
North Atlantic Fishing, Inc. v. Geremia
See, e.g., Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp., 769 F.2d 1451, 1460 (10th Cir.1985), cert. *615 denied, 476 U.S. 1104 , 106 S.Ct. 1947 , 90 L.Ed.2d 356 (1986); Kirkbride v. Lisbon Contractors, Inc., 521 Pa. 97, 102 , 555 A.2d 800, 803 (Pa.1989); Wangen v. Knudson, 428 N.W.2d 242, 246 (S.D.1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Peter N. Georgacarakos
See, e.g., United States v. Martinez, 901 F.2d 374, 376 (4th Cir.1990) (holding that failure to instruct on venue was not reversible error where clear proof of venue existed); see also United States v. Moeckly, 769 F.2d 453, 461 (8th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1104 , 106 S.Ct. 1947 , 90 L.Ed.2d 357 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gerogarakos
See, e.g., United ___ ____ ______ States v. Martinez, 901 F.2d 374, 376 (4th Cir. 1990) ______ ________ (holding that failure to instruct on venue was not reversible error where clear proof of venue existed); see also United ___ ____ ______ States v. Moeckly, 769 F.2d 453, 461 (8th Cir. 1985), cert. ______ _______ _____ denied, 476 U.S. 1104 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gerogarakos
See, e.g., United States v. Martinez, 901 F.2d 374, 376 (4th Cir. 1990) (holding that failure to instruct on venue was not reversible error where clear proof of venue existed); see also United States v. Moeckly, 769 F.2d 453, 461 (8th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1104 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ronald Belletiere
See, e.g., United States v. Moeckly, 769 F.2d 453, 465 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1015 , 106 S.Ct. 1196 , 89 L.Ed.2d 311 (1986), 476 U.S. 1104 , 106 S.Ct. 1947 , 90 L.Ed.2d 357 (1986); United States v. Ponticelli, 622 F.2d 985, 989 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1016 , 101 S.Ct. 578 , 66 L.Ed.2d 476 (1980); United States v. Richardson, 596 F.2d 157, 165 (6th Cir.1979). 88 I therefore believe that an enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1 may be proper when a defendant lies about drug use to a probation officer.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pauline Walber D/B/A Walber Construction Co. v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Jack Kemp, Secretary
An election will be considered informed, according to the Federal Circuit, where the plaintiff has been "furnished sufficient information to make a straightforward and conscious election whether to invoke the act." Tuttle/White Constructors, Inc. v. United States, 656 F.2d 644, 648 (Ct.Cl.1981); see also Massman v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 769 F.2d 1114, 1119 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1104 (1986) (citing Federal Circuit cases for the proposition that "the contractor must make a 'knowing election' before waiving its rights under the Act."); S.E.R., Jobs for Progress, Inc. v. Uni…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca8 1989
See, e.g., United States v. Moeckly, 769 F.2d 453, 464-65 (8th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1015 , 106 S.Ct. 1196 , 89 L.Ed.2d 311 , 476 U.S. 1104 , 106 S.Ct. 1947 , 90 L.Ed.2d 357 (1986); United States v. Bledsoe, 674 F.2d 647, 668 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1040 , 103 S.Ct. 456 , 74 L.Ed.2d 608 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jones
See, e.g., United States v. Moeckly, 769 F.2d 453, 464-65 (8th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 475 U.S. 1015 , 106 S.Ct. 1196 , 89 L.Ed.2d 311 , 476 U.S. 1104 , 106 S.Ct. 1947 , 90 L.Ed.2d 357 (1986); United States v. Bledsoe, 674 F.2d 647, 668 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1040 , 103 S.Ct. 456 , 74 L.Ed.2d 608 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marmon Dennis Record
See, e.g., United States v. Moeckly, 769 F.2d 453, 462 (8th Cir.1985) (denial of venue jury instruction harmless error when evidence establishing venue is uncontroverted and substantial), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1104 , 106 S.Ct. 1947 , 90 L.Ed.2d 357 (1986); United States v. Winship, 724 F.2d 1116, 1124-25 (5th Cir.1984) (failure to instruct on venue is reversible error when venue put into issue and defendant requests instruction).
Union Oil Company of California
v.
Spaeth
v.
Spaeth
No. 85-550.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 5, 1986.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.