green
Positive treatment
8.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Witherspoon v. United States
(2×)
But see Board of Overseers of the Bar v. Dineen, 481 A.2d 499 (Me.1984) (disciplinary action against an attorney for not revealing client’s false testimony to the court), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 2248 , 90 L.Ed.2d 694 (1986); In re King, 7 Utah 2d 258 , 322 P.2d 1095 (1958) (same).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Dombey v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Note, The Involuntary Public Figure Class of Gertz v. Welch: Dead or Merely Dormant? 14 U.MICH.J.L.REF. 71, 79-85 (1980); but see Meeropol v. Nizer, 560 F.2d 1061 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1013 , 98 S.Ct. 727 , 54 L.Ed.2d 756 (1978), and Dameron v. Washington Magazine, Inc., 779 F.2d 736 (D.C.Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 2247 , 90 L.Ed.2d 693 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Van Horn v. Van Horn
However, the court continued, “ ‘Beyond the grounds for vacation provided in the FAA, an award will only be set aside where “ ‘it is completely irrational or evidences a manifest disregard for the law.’ ” Id. (quoting Ki ernan, 137 F.3d at 594); see Stroh Container Co. v. Delphi Indus., Inc., 783 F.2d 743, 749 (8th Cir.) (“There is simply *745 no suggestion in the findings made by the arbitrators on the procedural arbitrability question that they expressly flouted the law in reaching their decision or otherwise acted irrationally.”), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 2249…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Burns
(2×)
See State v. Anderson, 379 N.W.2d 70, 75 (Minn.1985) (jury is in the best position to evaluate the circumstantial evidence surrounding a murder and the jury's verdict must be given due deference), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 2248 , 90 L.Ed.2d 694 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
ca8 1994
See Stroh Container Co. v. Delphi Indus., Inc., 783 F.2d 743 , 752 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 2249 , 90 L.Ed.2d 695 (1986). 18 We affirm the district court.
cited
Cited "see"
Kennedy v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.
See Stroh Container Co. v. Delphi Indus., Inc., 783 F.2d 743 , 752 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 2249 , 90 L.Ed.2d 695 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Thomas v. Scully
See United States v. Brown, 776 F.2d 397, 403 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 1793 , 90 L.Ed.2d 339 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gammaro v. Thorp Consumer Discount Co.
See Stroh Container Co. v. Delphi Indus., Inc., 783 F.2d 743 , 749-51 (8th Cir.) (listing additional grounds for review adopted by other circuits, but declining to decide whether to adopt any of them), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 2249 , 90 L.Ed.2d 695 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gammaro v. Thorp Consumer Discount Company
See Stroh Container Co. v. Delphi Indus., Inc., 783 F.2d 743 , 749-51 (8th Cir.) (listing additional grounds for review adopted by other circuits, but declining to decide whether to adopt any of them), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 2249 , 90 L.Ed.2d 695 (1986). 16 Gammaro's claim that the arbitration clause is unconscionable and his class action allegations are not subject to such limited review, however.
discussed
Cited "see"
Dunn v. State
See State v. Anderson, 379 N.W.2d 70, 80 (Minn.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 2248 , 90 L.Ed.2d 694 (1986) (Schwartz hearing not mandated until prima facie case of juror misconduct has been established).
cited
Cited "see"
Tetenes v. County of Rockland
See United States v. Local 560, IBT, 780 F.2d 267 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied 476 U.S. 1140 , 106 S.Ct. 2247 , 90 L.Ed.2d 693 (1986); Pagel, Inc. v. SEC, 803 F.2d 942 (8th Cir.1986); J.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
See United States v. Local 560, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 780 F.2d 267, 286 (3d Cir.1985) (“[T]he history of [organized crime] appointments to union office did cause a substantial portion of Local 560’s membership to surrender their right to democratic participation in the affairs of the union.”), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1140 , 106 S.Ct. 2247 , 90 L.Ed.2d 693 (1986); April 27, 1992 Memorandum & Order, 791 F.Supp. at 427 (S.D.N.Y.1992) (“The rank and file must be free to raise issues with their leadership without fear of reprisal.”); March 6, 1989 Opinion & Order, 708 F.S…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. District Council
Gov.Supp.Mem. at 7; See United States v. Local 560, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 581 F.Supp. 279, 337 (D.N.J.1984), aff’d, 780 F.2d 267 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1140 , 106 S.Ct. 2247 , 90 L.Ed.2d 693 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
See United States v. Local 560, 581 F.Supp. 279 (D.N.J.1984), aff'd and remanded, 780 F.2d 267 , 279-284 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1140 , 106 S.Ct. 2247 , 90 L.Ed.2d 693 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Prins v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.
(2×)
See Dameron v. Washington Magazine, Inc., 779 F.2d 736, 739 (D.C.Cir.1985) (citing Phillips v. Evening Star Newspaper Co., 424 A.2d 78, 88-90 (D.C.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 989 , 101 S.Ct. 2327 , 68 L.Ed.2d 848 (1981)), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 2247 , 90 L.Ed.2d 693 (1986); see also Restatement (Second) of Torts § 611, at 297 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Harry Hoffman Printing, Inc. v. Graphic Communications, International Union, Local 261
See Stroh Container Co. v. Delphi Indus., Inc., 783 F.2d 743 , 747-48 n. 7 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 2249 , 90 L.Ed.2d 695 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
In The Matter Of An Arbitration Between Harry Hoffman Printing, Inc.
See Stroh Container Co. v. Delphi Indus., Inc., 783 F.2d 743 , 747-48 n. 7 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 2249 , 90 L.Ed.2d 695 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gigante
See United States v. Local 560, Int’l Brothers of Teamsters, 581 F.Supp. 279, 331 (D.N.J.1984), aff'd, 780 F.2d 267 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1140 , 106 S.Ct. 2247 , 90 L.Ed.2d 693 (1986); see also United States v. Adams, 759 F.2d 1099, 1116 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 906 , 106 S.Ct. 275 , 88 L.Ed.2d 236 (1985) (“[w]e now decide that to be convicted of a RICO conspiracy, a defendant must agree to the commission of the predicate acts, and need not agree to commit personally those acts”).
cited
Cited "see"
Shockley v. State
See Board of Overseers of the Bar v. Dineen, Me.Supr.Jud.Ct., 481 A.2d 499 (1984), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 2248 , 90 L.Ed.2d 694 (1986). 9 .
cited
Cited "see"
Board of Overseers of the Bar v. Dineen
See Board of Overseers of the Bar v. Dineen, 500 A.2d 262 (Me.1985), cert. denied, Dineen v. Maine Bd. of Overseers of the Bar, 476 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 2248 , 90 L.Ed.2d 694 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
ca8 1988
See Stroh Container Co. v. Delphi Indus., Inc., 783 F.2d 743 , 751 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 2249 , 90 L.Ed.2d 695 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Union Asphalts & Roadoils, Inc. v. Mo-Kan Teamsters Pension Fund
See Stroh Container Co. v. Delphi Indus., Inc., 783 F.2d 743 , 751 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 2249 , 90 L.Ed.2d 695 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ver Dell Cox as Debtor in Possession of the Estate of Ver Dell Cox, Etc. v. Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood, Inc.
(2×)
See Stroh Container Co. v. Delphi Industries, Inc., 783 F.2d 743, 748-49 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 2249 , 90 L.Ed.2d 695 (1986); Michaels v. Mariforum Shipping, S.A., 624 F.2d 411 , 414 (2d Cir.1980). 7 The order denying the motion for a stay of arbitration proceedings pending resolution of the arbitration disputes is not an order denying an injunction appealable under 28 U.S.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bonanno Organized Crime Family of La Cosa Nostra
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Local 560, 780 F.2d 267 , 292-93 n. 32 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1140 , 106 S.Ct. 2247 , 90 L.Ed.2d 693 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Liberty Lobby, Inc. v. Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
(2×)
See Dameron v. Washington Magazine, Inc., 779 F.2d 736, 739 (D.C.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 2247 , 90 L.Ed.2d 693 (1986); see also W.
cited
Cited "see"
ca8 1987
Accord Stroh Container Co. v. Delphi Indus., 783 F.2d 743 , 750-51 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 2249 , 90 L.Ed.2d 695 (1986); Daniel Constr.
cited
Cited "see"
Iowa Electric Light & Power Co. v. Local Union 204 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
Accord Stroh Container Co. v. Delphi Indus., 783 F.2d 743 , 750-51 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 2249 , 90 L.Ed.2d 695 (1986); Daniel Constr.
discussed
Cited "see"
Jacobson v. Rochester Communications Corp.
Although one federal circuit court has found a plaintiff a limited purpose public figure; see Dameron v. Washington Magazine, Inc., 779 F.2d 786 (D.C.Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 2247 , 90 L.Ed.2d 693 (1986); “the instances of truly involuntary public figures must be exceedingly rare.” Gertz, 418 U.S. at 345 , 94 S.Ct. at 3009 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Donald E. Hiley and Ruth v. Hiley v. United States
See United States v. Local 560, 780 F.2d 267 , 292-93 n. 32 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 2247 , 90 L.Ed.2d 693 (1986); Rogers v. Webster, 776 F.2d 607 (6th Cir. 1985); National Acceptance Co. v. Bathalter, 705 F.2d 924 (7th Cir.1983); United States v. Second National Bank, 48 F.R.D. 268 (D.N.H.1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Local 6A, Cement & Concrete Workers, Laborers International Union
See U.S. v. Local 560, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 581 F.Supp. 279 (D.N.J.1984), aff’d., 780 F.2d 267 (3d Cir.1985), cert. den. — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 2247 , 90 L.Ed.2d 693 (1986); U.S. v. Ianniello, 86 Civ. *196 1552 (CSH) (S.D.N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental, & Reinforcing Ironworkers, Shopman's Local 493 v. EFCO Corp. & Construction Products, Inc.
See, e.g., Stroh Container Co. v. Delphi Indus., Inc., 783 F.2d 743 , 748-49 (8th Cir.) (noting that failure to comply with pre-arbitration steps in grievance procedure was an issue of procedural arbitrability for arbitrator, not court, to decide), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 2249 , 90 L.Ed.2d 695 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
International Association Of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental, And Reinforcing Ironworkers, Shopman's Local 493, Appellant v. Efco Corporation And Construction Products, Inc., Appellee
See, e.g., Stroh Container Co. v. Delphi Indus., Inc., 783 F.2d 743 , 748-49 (8th Cir.) (noting that failure to comply with pre-arbitration steps in grievance procedure was an issue of procedural arbitrability for arbitrator, not court, to decide), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 2249 , 90 L.Ed.2d 695 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gerald W. Kerr v. Charles F. Vatterott & Co. Commerce Bank of St. Louis, N. A.
See also Stroh Container Co. v. Delphi Indus., Inc., 783 F.2d 743 , 752 (8th Cir.) (the purposes of prejudgment interest are “to compensate prevailing parties for the true costs of money damages incurred [legal, compensatory damages], and ... to promote settlement and deter attempts to benefit unfairly from the inherent delays of litigation [equitable relief]”), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 2249 , 90 L.Ed.2d 695 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gerald W. Kerr v. Charles F. Vatterott
See also Stroh Container Co. v. Delphi Indus., Inc., 783 F.2d 743 , 752 (8th Cir.) (the purposes of prejudgment interest are "to compensate prevailing parties for the true costs of money damages incurred [legal, compensatory damages], and . . . to promote settlement and deter attempts to benefit unfairly from the inherent delays of litigation [equitable relief]"), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1141 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jonas Stelmokas, A/K/A Jonas Stelmokevicius
(2×)
See also United States v. Local 560 of the Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters, etc., 780 F.2d 267 , 292 n. 32 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1140 , 106 S.Ct. 2247 , 90 L.Ed.2d 693 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Stelmokas
See also United States v. Local 560 of the Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters, etc., 780 F.2d 267 , 292 n.32 (3d Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1140 , 106 S.Ct. 2247 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Private Sanitation Industry Ass'n of Nassau/Suffolk Inc.
See, e.g., United States v. Local 560, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 581 F.Supp. 279 (D.N.J.1984), aff'd, 780 F.2d 267 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1140 , 106 S.Ct. 2247 , 90 L.Ed.2d 693 (1986); United States v. Local 30, United Slate, Tile and Composition Roofers, 686 F.Supp. 1139 (E.D.Pa.1988), app. dismissed, 871 F.2d 401 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 953 , 110 S.Ct. 363 , 107 L.Ed.2d 350 (1989); United States v. Local 295, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 784 F.Supp. 15 (E.D.N.Y.1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nicholson v. Promotors on Listings
(2×)
See, e.g., Dameron v. Washington Magazine, Inc., 779 F.2d 736, 740 (D.C.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 2247 , 90 L.Ed.2d 693 (1986); National Life Insurance Co. v. Phillips Publishing, Inc., 793 F.Supp. 627, 631 (D.Md.1992) (collecting cases); Church of Scientology International v. Eli Lilly & Co., 778 F.Supp. 661 , 666 n. 3 (S.D.N.Y.1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Alt
See, e.g., State v. Anderson, 379 N.W.2d 70, 79 (Minn.1985), ce rt. denied, 476 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 2248 , 90 L.Ed.2d 694 (1986). 21 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Portland General Electric Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
See also United States v. Local 560 of International Brotherhood, etc., 780 F.2d 267 , 295 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1140 , 106 S.Ct. 2247 , 90 L.Ed.2d 693 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Fitigues, Inc. v. Varat Enterprises, Inc.
Varat’s Reply Memorandum at 9; see also Stroh Container Co. v. Delphi Indus., Inc., 783 F.2d 743 , 751-53 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 2249 , 90 L.Ed.2d 695 (1986); Marion Mfg.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hughes v. Technology Licensing Consultants, Inc.
See also United States v. Local 560 of International Broth., etc., 780 F.2d 267 , 295 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1140 , 106 S.Ct. 2247 , 90 L.Ed.2d 693 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Leonard A. Pelullo
See also United States v. Local 560 of Int’l Bhd. of Teamsters, etc., 780 F.2d 267, 290 (3d Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1140 , 106 S.Ct. 2247 , 90 L.Ed.2d 693 (1986); Seville Indus.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Private Sanitation Industry Ass'n of Nassau
See also United States v. Local 560 of International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 780 F.2d 267, 281-82 (3d Cir.1985) (“property” in Hobbs Act includes intangible property rights), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1140 , 106 S.Ct. 2247 , 90 L.Ed.2d 693 (1986); United States v. Zemek, 634 F.2d 1159, 1174 (9th Cir.1980) (same), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 916 , 101 S.Ct. 1359 , 67 L.Ed.2d 341 (1981); United States v. Santoni, 585 F.2d 667, 673 (4th Cir.1978) (same), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 910 , 99 S.Ct. 1221 , 59 L.Ed.2d 459 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Helinski v. Rosenberg
(2×)
See also Dameron v. Washington Magazine, Inc., 779 F.2d 736 (D.C.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 2247 , 90 L.Ed.2d 693 (1986), in which the court opined that “[t]he conditional immunity that applies to the publication of fair and accurate reports of official proceedings is an exception *165 to the common law rule that one who repeats or republishes a defamation uttered by another ‘adopts’ it as his own.” Id. at 739 (magazine article reporting on safety at National Airport fell outside privilege’s scope because it did not relate directly to governmental reports or p…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Schaeffer
(2×)
State v. Fenney, 448 N.W.2d 54, 61 (Minn. 1989); see also State v. Anderson, 379 N.W.2d 70, 79 (Minn.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 2248 , 90 L.Ed.2d 694 (1986); State v. Saxton, 331 N.W.2d 240, 242 (Minn.1983); State v. Michaeloff, 324 N.W.2d 926, 927 (Minn.1982); State v. Lee, 266 N.W.2d 181, 182 (Minn.1978); State v. Wakefield, 263 N.W.2d 76, 77 (Minn.1978); State v. Hill, 312 Minn. 514, 525 , 253 N.W.2d 378, 385 (1977); State v. Goblirsch, 309 Minn. 401, 407 , 246 N.W.2d 12, 15 (1976); State v. Perry, 274 Minn. 1, 12-13 , 142 N.W.2d 573, 580 (1966); State v. Torkelson, 404 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Schwartz
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Anderson, 379 N.W.2d 70, 79 (Minn.1985) (graphological personality assessment), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1141 , 106 S.Ct. 2248 , 90 L.Ed.2d 694 (1986); Mack, 292 N.W.2d at 768 (hypnotically induced testimony); State v. Kolander, 236 Minn. 209, 220 , 52 N.W.2d 458, 464 (1952) (lie detector tests).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Moseley, Hallgarten, Estabrook & Weeden, Inc. v. Bernard Ellis
See Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc. v. Liang, 653 F.2d 310, 312 (7th Cir.1981) (Holding that “[w]e can set aside an arbitration award only on the grounds set forth in section 10 of the Federal Arbitration Act.”) (emphasis added); Tamari v. Bache Halsey Stuart, Inc., 619 F.2d 1196 , 1198 n. 2 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 873 , 101 S.Ct. 213 , 66 L.Ed.2d 93 (1980) (Wherein we noted that “[o]ur power to set aside an arbitration award is limited to the grounds in 9 U.S.C. § 10 .”) (emphasis added); see also Stroh Container Co. v. Delphi Industries, Inc., 783 F.2d 743, 749 (8th Cir.), ce…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cameron v. Knapp
(Daniels v Cummins, 66 Misc 2d 575, 580-582 [Westchester County 1971]; see also, State v Anderson, 379 NW2d 70, 79-80 [Minn 1985], cert denied 476 US 1141 [1986]; Carroll v State, 634 SW2d 99, 101-102 [Ark 1982]; Warren v Hartnett, 561 SW2d 860, 863 [Tex App 1978]; People v Hester, 39 Ill 2d 489, 237 NE2d 466, 480 [1968], cert dismissed 397 US 660 [1970].) Courts across this country have uniformly disapproved of attempts to have a handwriting "expert” testify as to an individual’s mental or physical condition based on a handwriting sample. * For example, in Daniels (supra), the plaintiffs …
Dameron
v.
Washington Magazine, Inc.
v.
Washington Magazine, Inc.
No. 85-1569.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 27, 1986.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.