Kemp v. Wilson, 476 U.S. 1153 (1986). · Go Syfert
Kemp v. Wilson, 476 U.S. 1153 (1986). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
260 citation events (45 in the last 25 years) across 44 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State Of Louisiana v. Margaret Camaille Stockstill (lactapp, 2024-10-11) · Strongest negative: Reed v. Brae Railcar Management, Inc. (ilnd, 1989-07-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "but see" Reed v. Brae Railcar Management, Inc.
N.D. Ill. · 1989 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see United States v. Kairys, 782 F.2d 1374, 1381 (7th Cir.) ("Legislative enactments are presumed to be prospective absent clear statements by Congress to the contrary.”), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2258 , 90 L.Ed.2d 703 (1986).
cited Cited "see" State Of Louisiana v. Margaret Camaille Stockstill
La. Ct. App. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Rushing, 464 So.2d 268, 275 ( La. 1985), cert. denied, 476 U. S. 1153 , 106 S. Ct. 2258 , 90 L.Ed.2d 703 ( 1986); State v. Brister, 2019- 507 ( La.
discussed Cited "see" State of Tennessee v. Anthony M. Bond
Tenn. Crim. App. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Barnes, 703 S.W.2d 611, 614-15 (Tenn. 1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 (1986); State v. Randolph, 676 S.W.2d 943, 948 (Tenn. 1984); Letner v. State, 299 S.W. 1049, 1051 (1927); Copeland v. State, 285 S.W. 565, 566 (1926); Odeneal v. State, 157 S.W. 419 , 421 (1913).
cited Cited "see" Johnson v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Byrd v. State, 481 So.2d 468, 474 (Fla.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2261 , 90 L.Ed.2d 705 (1986).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Dishman
Tenn. Crim. App. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Harbison, 704 S.W.2d 314 , 319 (Tenn.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2261 , 90 L.Ed.2d 705 (1986); State v. Thompson, 519 S.W.2d 789, 792 (Tenn. 1975); State v. Elliot, 703 S.W.2d 171, 179 (Tenn. Crim.
cited Cited "see" State v. Baker
Tenn. Crim. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Harbison, 704 S.W.2d 314 , 318 (Tenn.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2261 , 90 L.Ed.2d 705 (1986).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Brooks
La. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Lowenfield, 495 So.2d 1245 , 1253 n. 7 (La.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2259 , 90 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986). [11] La.Code Crim.P. art. 905.5(c) provides: The following shall be considered mitigating circumstances: (c) The offense was committed while the offender was under the influence or under the domination of another person. [12] La.Code Crim.P. art. 905.5(e) provides: The following shall be considered mitigating circumstances: (e) At the time of the offense the capacity of the offender to appreciate the criminality of his conduct or to conform his conduct to the req…
discussed Cited "see" Turner v. State
Fla. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Byrd v. State, 481 So.2d 468 , 472 (Fla. 1985) ("[A]n entry under those circumstances is consensual, at least with respect to the area immediately surrounding the threshold or vestibule entrance of the residence, particularly where the defendant makes no objection."), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2261 , 90 L.Ed.2d 705 (1986).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Nichols (2×)
Tenn. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Harbison, 704 S.W.3d 314 , 318 (Tenn.1986), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2261 , 90 L.Ed.2d 705 (1986).
cited Cited "see" State v. Williams
La. Ct. App. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Lowenfield, 495 So.2d 1245, 1254 (La.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2259 , 90 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986).
discussed Cited "see" James Mathis, Cross-Appellant v. Walter Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Cross-Appellee (2×)
11th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wilson v. Kemp, 777 F.2d 621, 622-23 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2258 , 90 L.Ed.2d 703 (1986). .
discussed Cited "see" Federal Savings & Loan Insurance Corp. v. T.F. Stone-Liberty Land Associates
Tex. App. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Kairys, 782 F.2d 1374, 1381 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2258 , 90 L.Ed.2d 703 (1986); *488 United States v. Blue Sea Line, 553 F.2d 445, 448-49 (5th Cir.1977).
cited Cited "see" Oliva v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Byrd v. State, 481 So.2d 468 (Fla.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2261 , 90 L.Ed.2d 705 (1986).
cited Cited "see" State v. Diaz
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Byrd v. State, 481 So.2d 468, 472 (Fla.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2261 , 90 L.Ed.2d 705 (1986).
cited Cited "see" State v. Collins
La. Ct. App. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Lowenfield, 495 So.2d 1245 (La. 1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2259 , 90 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986).
discussed Cited "see" Outlet Communications, Inc. v. King World Productions, Inc.
M.D. Fla. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
“A tying arrangement is ‘an agreement by a party to sell one product [the “tying” product] but only on the condition that the buyer also purchases a different (or “tied”) product.’ ” Tic-X-Press, 815 F.2d at 1414 (quoting Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United States, 356 U.S. 1, 5-6 , 78 S.Ct. 514, 518-19 , 2 L.Ed.2d 545 (1958)); see Amey, Inc. v. Gulf Abstract & Title, Inc., 758 F.2d 1486, 1502 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 1513 , 89 L.Ed.2d 912 (1986); Midwestern Waffles, Inc. v. Waffle House, Inc., 734 F.2d 705, 711 (11th Cir.1984) (per curiam); O…
examined Cited "see" State v. McDougall (3×)
Idaho Ct. App. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Beam, 109 Idaho 616 , 710 P.2d 526 (1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2260 , 90 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Michelle Franze
Tenn. Crim. App. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
Poe v. State, 212 Tenn. 413 , 370 S.W.2d 488, 489 (Tenn. 1963); see also State v. Harbison, 704 S.W.2d 314 , 419 (Tenn. 1986), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.C 2261 (1986); State v. t.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Ferenc Koreh
3rd Cir. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
Jan. 3, 1990), aff'd, 923 F.2d 1253 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 921 , 112 S.Ct. 331 , 116 L.Ed.2d 272 (1991); United States v. Schuk, 565 F.Supp. 613, 615 (E.D.Pa.1983); see also United States v. Kairys, 600 F.Supp. 1254, 1264 (N.D.Ill.1984), aff'd, 782 F.2d 1374, 1384 (7th Cir.) (noting on appeal that the court need not reach the issue because the defendant did not meet the burden of proving laches), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2258 , 90 L.Ed.2d 703 (1986).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Duncan
La. Ct. App. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
"Against these factors is to be weighed the corrupting effect of the suggestive identification itself." Id.; see also State v. Lowenfield, 495 So.2d 1245 (La.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2259 , 90 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986); State v. Prudholm, 446 So.2d 729 (La.1984); State v. Winn, 412 So.2d 1337 (La.1982).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mitchell Thomas Blazak, Petitioner-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. James R. Ricketts, Donald Wawrzaszek, Respondents-Appellants-Cross-Appellees (2×)
9th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Wilson v. Kemp, 777 F.2d 621, 622-23 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2258 , 90 L.Ed.2d 703 (1986); Blake, 758 F.2d at 525 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Martin
La. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
"Against these factors is to be weighed the corrupting effect of the suggestive identification itself." Id.; see also State v. Lowenfield, 495 So.2d 1245 (La.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2259 , 90 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986); State v. Prudholm, 446 So.2d 729 (La.1984); State v. Winn, 412 So.2d 1337 (La.1982).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Cosgrove v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (2×)
Idaho · 1990 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Beam, 109 Idaho 616 , 710 P.2d 526 (1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2260 , 90 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Buttrum v. Black, Warden
SCOTUS · 1986 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Wilson v. Kemp, 777 F. 2d 621, 626-628 (1985), cert. denied, 476 U. S. 1153 (1986); Drake v. Kemp, 762 F. 2d 1449, 1458-1461 (1985), cert. denied, 478 U. S. 1020 (1986).
Kemp, Warden
v.
Wilson
No. 85-1646.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 27, 1986.
476 U.S. 1153
Published

C. A. 11th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.