green
Positive treatment
6.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Reed v. Brae Railcar Management, Inc.
But see United States v. Kairys, 782 F.2d 1374, 1381 (7th Cir.) ("Legislative enactments are presumed to be prospective absent clear statements by Congress to the contrary.”), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2258 , 90 L.Ed.2d 703 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
State Of Louisiana v. Margaret Camaille Stockstill
See State v. Rushing, 464 So.2d 268, 275 ( La. 1985), cert. denied, 476 U. S. 1153 , 106 S. Ct. 2258 , 90 L.Ed.2d 703 ( 1986); State v. Brister, 2019- 507 ( La.
discussed
Cited "see"
State of Tennessee v. Anthony M. Bond
See State v. Barnes, 703 S.W.2d 611, 614-15 (Tenn. 1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 (1986); State v. Randolph, 676 S.W.2d 943, 948 (Tenn. 1984); Letner v. State, 299 S.W. 1049, 1051 (1927); Copeland v. State, 285 S.W. 565, 566 (1926); Odeneal v. State, 157 S.W. 419 , 421 (1913).
cited
Cited "see"
Johnson v. State
See Byrd v. State, 481 So.2d 468, 474 (Fla.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2261 , 90 L.Ed.2d 705 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Dishman
See State v. Harbison, 704 S.W.2d 314 , 319 (Tenn.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2261 , 90 L.Ed.2d 705 (1986); State v. Thompson, 519 S.W.2d 789, 792 (Tenn. 1975); State v. Elliot, 703 S.W.2d 171, 179 (Tenn. Crim.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Baker
See State v. Harbison, 704 S.W.2d 314 , 318 (Tenn.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2261 , 90 L.Ed.2d 705 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Brooks
See State v. Lowenfield, 495 So.2d 1245 , 1253 n. 7 (La.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2259 , 90 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986). [11] La.Code Crim.P. art. 905.5(c) provides: The following shall be considered mitigating circumstances: (c) The offense was committed while the offender was under the influence or under the domination of another person. [12] La.Code Crim.P. art. 905.5(e) provides: The following shall be considered mitigating circumstances: (e) At the time of the offense the capacity of the offender to appreciate the criminality of his conduct or to conform his conduct to the req…
discussed
Cited "see"
Turner v. State
See Byrd v. State, 481 So.2d 468 , 472 (Fla. 1985) ("[A]n entry under those circumstances is consensual, at least with respect to the area immediately surrounding the threshold or vestibule entrance of the residence, particularly where the defendant makes no objection."), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2261 , 90 L.Ed.2d 705 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Nichols
(2×)
See State v. Harbison, 704 S.W.3d 314 , 318 (Tenn.1986), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2261 , 90 L.Ed.2d 705 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Williams
See State v. Lowenfield, 495 So.2d 1245, 1254 (La.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2259 , 90 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
James Mathis, Cross-Appellant v. Walter Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Cross-Appellee
(2×)
See Wilson v. Kemp, 777 F.2d 621, 622-23 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2258 , 90 L.Ed.2d 703 (1986). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Federal Savings & Loan Insurance Corp. v. T.F. Stone-Liberty Land Associates
See United States v. Kairys, 782 F.2d 1374, 1381 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2258 , 90 L.Ed.2d 703 (1986); *488 United States v. Blue Sea Line, 553 F.2d 445, 448-49 (5th Cir.1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Oliva v. State
See Byrd v. State, 481 So.2d 468 (Fla.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2261 , 90 L.Ed.2d 705 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Diaz
See Byrd v. State, 481 So.2d 468, 472 (Fla.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2261 , 90 L.Ed.2d 705 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Collins
See State v. Lowenfield, 495 So.2d 1245 (La. 1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2259 , 90 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Outlet Communications, Inc. v. King World Productions, Inc.
“A tying arrangement is ‘an agreement by a party to sell one product [the “tying” product] but only on the condition that the buyer also purchases a different (or “tied”) product.’ ” Tic-X-Press, 815 F.2d at 1414 (quoting Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United States, 356 U.S. 1, 5-6 , 78 S.Ct. 514, 518-19 , 2 L.Ed.2d 545 (1958)); see Amey, Inc. v. Gulf Abstract & Title, Inc., 758 F.2d 1486, 1502 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 1513 , 89 L.Ed.2d 912 (1986); Midwestern Waffles, Inc. v. Waffle House, Inc., 734 F.2d 705, 711 (11th Cir.1984) (per curiam); O…
examined
Cited "see"
State v. McDougall
(3×)
See State v. Beam, 109 Idaho 616 , 710 P.2d 526 (1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2260 , 90 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Michelle Franze
Poe v. State, 212 Tenn. 413 , 370 S.W.2d 488, 489 (Tenn. 1963); see also State v. Harbison, 704 S.W.2d 314 , 419 (Tenn. 1986), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.C 2261 (1986); State v. t.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ferenc Koreh
Jan. 3, 1990), aff'd, 923 F.2d 1253 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 921 , 112 S.Ct. 331 , 116 L.Ed.2d 272 (1991); United States v. Schuk, 565 F.Supp. 613, 615 (E.D.Pa.1983); see also United States v. Kairys, 600 F.Supp. 1254, 1264 (N.D.Ill.1984), aff'd, 782 F.2d 1374, 1384 (7th Cir.) (noting on appeal that the court need not reach the issue because the defendant did not meet the burden of proving laches), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2258 , 90 L.Ed.2d 703 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Duncan
"Against these factors is to be weighed the corrupting effect of the suggestive identification itself." Id.; see also State v. Lowenfield, 495 So.2d 1245 (La.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2259 , 90 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986); State v. Prudholm, 446 So.2d 729 (La.1984); State v. Winn, 412 So.2d 1337 (La.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mitchell Thomas Blazak, Petitioner-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. James R. Ricketts, Donald Wawrzaszek, Respondents-Appellants-Cross-Appellees
(2×)
See, e.g., Wilson v. Kemp, 777 F.2d 621, 622-23 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2258 , 90 L.Ed.2d 703 (1986); Blake, 758 F.2d at 525 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Martin
"Against these factors is to be weighed the corrupting effect of the suggestive identification itself." Id.; see also State v. Lowenfield, 495 So.2d 1245 (La.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2259 , 90 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986); State v. Prudholm, 446 So.2d 729 (La.1984); State v. Winn, 412 So.2d 1337 (La.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cosgrove v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Beam, 109 Idaho 616 , 710 P.2d 526 (1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1153 , 106 S.Ct. 2260 , 90 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Buttrum v. Black, Warden
See, e. g., Wilson v. Kemp, 777 F. 2d 621, 626-628 (1985), cert. denied, 476 U. S. 1153 (1986); Drake v. Kemp, 762 F. 2d 1449, 1458-1461 (1985), cert. denied, 478 U. S. 1020 (1986).
Kemp, Warden
v.
Wilson
v.
Wilson
No. 85-1646.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 27, 1986.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.