green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 5×
15.5 score
G Cite
cited 6× by 2 distinct cases ·
"The precise scope of the category of claims to which the Cuyler standard applies has not been definitively stated by the Supreme Court"
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
"it takes very little evidence to establish the existence of the actual confusion factor"
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“That Kraft in fact used the mark in 1980 does not mean that Kraft intended to use mark in 1978.”
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 49 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Lisa Ann BURNS, Appellant, v. McGREGOR ELECTRONIC INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellee
Swift, Words and Women 109 (1977)); see also Andrews v. City of Philadelphia, 895 F.2d 1469, 1485 (3d Cir.1990) (holding that “pervasive use of derogatory and insulting terms relating to women generally and addressed to female employees personally may serve as evidence of a hostile environment”); Ellison v. Brady, 924 F.2d 872, 877-78 (9th Cir.1991) (same); but see Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co., 805 F.2d 611 (6th Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Taco Cabana International, Inc. v. Two Pesos, Inc.
But see AmBrit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc., 812 F.2d 1531, 1537 (11th Cir.1986) (noting exception to general rule of totality when third party use of one or more elements of plaintiff’s trade dress is so extensive and so similar to plaintiff's that it impairs ability of consumers to identify source), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 822 (1987). 5 .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Beets v. Collins
the precise scope of the category of claims to which the cuyler standard applies has not been definitively stated by the supreme court
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Betty Lou Beets v. Wayne Scott, Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
the precise scope of the category of claims to which the cuyler standard applies has not been definitively stated by the supreme court
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
McKay v. Mad Murphy's, Inc.
that kraft in fact used the mark in 1980 does not mean that kraft intended to use mark in 1978.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Mitchell
(2×)
it is merely concluded that the company's pre-discharge conduct toward plaintiff was not based on anti-female animus. absent such animus, there can be no violation of title vii
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Conopco, Inc. v. May Dept. Stores Co.
it takes very little evidence to establish the existence of the actual confusion factor
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Feilberto Flores v. United States
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
We concluded that Flores did not suffer prejudice, since "[t]he abundant evidence against Flores establishes that the result of the trial--Flores' conviction--was reliable." Id. at 1080.
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Tracy
See Commonwealth v. Martens, 398 Mass. 674, 677 (1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Rzepphiewski
See Commonwealth v. Martens, 398 Mass. 674, 678 (1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 (1987), citing Commonwealth v. DeChristoforo, 360 Mass. 531, 543 , (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Moore v. University of Notre Dame
See McNeil v. Economics Laboratory, Inc., 800 F.2d 111, 118 (7th Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987), overruled on other grounds by Coston v. Plitt Theatres, Inc., 860 F.2d 834 (7th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Klemencic v. Ohio State University
See Yeary v. Goodwill Industries-Knoxville, Inc., 107 F.3d 443, 445 (6th Cir.1997), citing Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co., 805 F.2d 611, 619-20 (6th Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Benhardt v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS OF WYANDOTTE
It is not designed to purge the workplace of vulgarity.” Baskerville, 50 F.3d at 430 ; see Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co., 584 F.Supp. 419, 430 (E.D.Mich.1984) (noting that Title VII was not “designed to bring about a magical transformation in the social mores of American workers”), aff'd, 805 F.2d 611 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Hegwood v. Pharmacia/Upjohn
See Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co., 805 F.2d 611, 620 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987); Gagne v. Northwestern National Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Douglas v. Mitzelfeld's, Inc.
See Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co., 805 F.2d 611 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987); Jones v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co., Inc., 871 F.Supp. 305 (E.D.Mich.1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Scannell v. Bel Air Police Department
See Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co., 805 F.2d 611, 620 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987) (proof that the harassment significantly affects plaintiffs psychological well-being essential element of harassment claim); but see Harris, 510 U.S. at 22 , 114 S.Ct. at 370-71 (“But Title VII comes into play before the harassing conduct leads to a nervous breakdown.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rodiriecus L. v. Waukegan School District No. 60
(2×)
See United States v. Hillsberg, 812 F.2d 328, 336 (7th Cir.) (stating that "Rule 10(e) [of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure] does not give this court authority to admit on appeal any document which was not made part of the record in the district court.”) (quotation omitted), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1981 , 95 L.Ed.2d 821 (1987). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Rodiriecus v. Waukegan School District No. 60
(2×)
See United States v. Hillsberg, 812 F.2d 328, 336 (7th Cir.) (stating that "Rule 10(e) [of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure] does not give this court authority to admit on appeal any document which was not made part of the record in the district court.") (quotation omitted), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1981 , 95 L.Ed.2d 821 (1987). 2 The Act defines children with disabilities to mean "children with mental retardation, hearing impairments including deafness, speech or language impairments, visual impairments including blindness, serious emotional disturbance, orthopedic impa…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Juan Alcantar, Also Known as Canelo
(2×)
See United States v. Hillsberg, 812 F.2d 328, 336 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1981 , 95 L.Ed.2d 821 (1987); Borden, Inc. v. FTC, 495 F.2d 785, 788 (7th Cir.1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Barnes v. Breeden
See Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co., 805 F.2d 611, 621 (6th Cir.1986) cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987). 13 Title VII affords an employee the right to work in an environment free from discriminatory intimidation, ridicule and insult.
discussed
Cited "see"
Foxworthy v. Custom Tees, Inc.
See AmBrit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc., 805 F.2d 974, 987-88 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 822 (1986); see also E & J Gallo, 782 F.Supp. at 464-65 (confusion more likely where products are impulse purchases, such as wine).
cited
Cited "see"
Taylor Made Golf Co. v. Trend Precision Golf, Inc.
See AmBrit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc., 812 F.2d 1531, 1535-1537 (11th Cir.1986) (analyzing trade dress infringement), cer t. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 822 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hopkins v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.
See Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co., 805 F.2d 611, 620 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987); Henson v. City of Dundee, 682 F.2d 897, 902 (11th Cir.1982); Bundy v. Jackson, 641 F.2d 934 , 942 n. 7 (D.C.Cir.1981); but see Chiapuzio v. BLT Operating Corp., 826 F.Supp. 1334, 1337 (D.
cited
Cited "see"
SPARROW
See AmBrit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc., 812 F.2d 1531 (11th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 (1987); Matter of Onal, 18 I&N Dec. 147 (BIA 1981, 1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wildlife Express Corporation v. Carol Wright Sales, Incorporated
See AmBrit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc., 812 F.2d 1531 , 1541 n. 46 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 822 (1987) (rejecting de novo review, adhering to “clear error” for review of finding of similarity in trade dress infringement). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.
(2×)
See Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co., 805 F. 2d 611, 620 (CA6 1986), cert. denied, 481 U. S. 1041 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Baab v. AMR Services Corp.
See Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co., 805 F.2d 611 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Eddie Keeper
See United States v. Wajda, 810 F.2d 754, 761-62 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1040 , 107 S.Ct. 1981 , 95 L.Ed.2d 821 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Lucille R. Kauffman v. Allied Signal, Inc., Autolite Division
See Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co., 805 F.2d 611, 618 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987); Yates v. Avco Corp., 819 F.2d 630, 634 (6th Cir.1987).
examined
Cited "see"
Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Rev., at 1047, 1049. [9] See, e. g., Germain, Unfair Trade Practices Under § 43(a) of the Lanham Act: You've Come a Long Way BabyToo Far, Maybe?, 64 Trademark Rep. 193 , 194 (1974) ("It is submitted that the cases have applied Section 43(a) to situations it was not intended to cover and have used it in ways that it was not designed to function"). [10] 2 McCarthy § 27:3, p. 345. [11] The United States Trademark Association Trademark Review Commission Report and Recommendations to USTA President and Board of Directors, 77 Trademark Rep. 375 , 426 (1987). [12] Indeed, in count one of the comp…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lucelly Abadia, A/K/A Lucelly Ochoa
See Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 501 , 103 S.Ct. 1319, 1326 , 75 L.Ed.2d 229 (1983) (plurality opinion) (opinion of White, J.) (“statements given during a period of illegal detention are inadmissible even though voluntarily given if they are the product of the illegal detention and not the result of an independent act of free will.”). 11 We disagree with Abadia’s second claim — that her pre-arrest detention was not supported by probable cause 12 — and we therefore affirm *959 her conviction. 13 “Probable cause ... to make a war-rantless arrest [exists] when, at the moment of the…
cited
Cited "see"
Daniel P. Ruth v. The Children's Medical Center
See Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co., 805 F.2d 611 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Darren Jay Dennison
(2×)
See United States v. Hillsberg, 812 F.2d 328, 331-32 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1981 , 95 L.Ed.2d 821 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Deborah S. Ceszyk v. Francis J. Cuneo, Jr.
See, United States v. Hillsberg, 812 F.2d 328, 336 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 3 This is not to suggest that the existence of this remedy would preclude any additional relief the district court may deem appropriate should Ceszyk prevail on the merits
cited
Cited "see"
John E. Morgan v. Massachusetts General Hospital
See Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co., 805 F.2d 611, 620 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Chace v. Champion Spark Plug Co.
See McNeil v. Economics Laboratory, Inc., 800 F.2d 111, 118 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Keith Williams
See United States v. Wajda, 810 F.2d 754, 758 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1040 , 107 S.Ct. 1981 , 95 L.Ed.2d 821 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cerveceria Centroamericana, S.A. v. Cerveceria India, Inc.
(2×)
Remy Martin & Co., S.A. v. Shaw-Ross Int’l Imports, Inc., 756 F.2d 1525, 1532 , 225 USPQ 1131, 1136 (11th Cir.1985); see AmBrit Inc. v. Kraft Inc. 805 F.2d 974 , 994 & n. 106, 1 USPQ2d 1161, 1177 & n. 106 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 822 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Houston
See United States v. Wajda, 810 F.2d 754, 758 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1040 , 107 S.Ct. 1981 , 95 L.Ed.2d 821 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Paul Kordenbrock v. Gene Scroggy, Warden, Kentucky State Penitentiary
(2×)
See Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co., 805 F.2d 611, 616 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Elizabeth M. Paroline v. Unisys Corporation Edgar L. Moore
(2×)
See Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co., 805 F.2d 611, 620 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cullman Ventures, Inc. v. Columbian Art Works, Inc.
Harland Co. v. Clarke Checks, Inc., 711 F.2d 966, 977 (11th Cir.1983); see Ambrit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc., 812 F.2d 1531, 1543 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 822 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Derrick Deon Horton, A/K/A Thomas Deon Hill, United States of America v. Derrick Deon Horton, A/K/A Thomas Deon Hill
See United States v. Wajda, 810 F.2d 754 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1040 , 107 S.Ct. 1981 , 95 L.Ed.2d 821 (1987); United States v. Randle, 815 F.2d 505 (8th Cir.1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Hunter v. Countryside Ass'n for the Handicapped, Inc.
See McNeil v. Economics Laboratory, Inc., 800 F.2d 111, 118 (7th Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Clamp Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Enco Manufacturing Company, Inc., Colex, Inc.
See Ambrit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc., 812 F.2d 1531, 1546 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 822 (1987); Tandy Corp. v. Malone & Hyde, Inc., 769 F.2d 362, 365-66 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1158 , 106 S.Ct. 2277 , 90 L.Ed.2d 719 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Andrew W. Hansard, Cross-Appellant v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co., Inc., D/B/A Pepsi-Cola Bottling Group, Cross-Appellee
See McNeil v. Economics Laboratory, Inc., 800 F.2d 111, 118 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987); Wildman v. Lerner Stores Corp., 771 F.2d 605, 614-16 (1st Cir.1985); Maxfield v. Sinclair Int'l, 766 F.2d 788 , 795-97 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1057 , 106 S.Ct. 796 , 88 L.Ed.2d 773 (1986); O’Donnell v. Georgia Osteopathic Hosp., Inc., 748 F.2d 1543, 1551 (11th Cir.1984); Whittlesey v. Union Carbide Corp., 742 F.2d 724, 726 (2d Cir.1984); Davis, 742 F.2d at 922-23 ; EEOC v. Prudential Fed.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Villegas
See, United States v. Wajda, 810 F.2d 754 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 1981 , 95 L.Ed.2d 821 (1987) (presence in house where drug distribution network operating sufficient for conviction of possession of narcotics when supported by presence of large amount of narcotics and drug paraphernalia).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re the Extradition of Singh
(2×)
See United States v. Hillsberg, 812 F.2d 328, 335 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1981 , 95 L.Ed.2d 821 (1987) (judge’s receipt of letter from defendant’s mother no basis for recusal; letter received in judicial capacity and “[i]t would be unreasonable to conclude that the fact that a defendant’s mother writes to the judge asking for mercy makes the judge partial.
cited
Cited "see"
Clayton v. Howard Johnson Franchise Systems, Inc.
See Ambrit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc., 812 F.2d 1531, 1544 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 822 (1987).
Hillsberg
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 86-6622.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 4, 1987.
Cited by 106 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (2) · Wisconsin Supreme Court (2) · D. Connecticut (1) · E.D. Missouri (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.