green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.0 score
“the first element of the test does not require legislation explicitly authorizing the challenged conduct, but only an indication by the state that it intends to displace competition with regulation in the particular area of commerce”
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 36 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Monsanto Co. v. Department of Public Utilities
the first element of the test does not require legislation explicitly authorizing the challenged conduct, but only an indication by the state that it intends to displace competition with regulation in the particular area of commerce
discussed
Cited "see"
Martinez v. Dretke
See Gilliard v. Scroggy, 847 F.2d 1141, 1147 (5th Cir.1988) (holding the decision not to make an opening statement in a death penalty case was “the essence of a strategic choice”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 818 , 102 L.Ed.2d 807 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Frost
See State v. Eaton, 524 So.2d 1194 (La.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 818 , 102 L.Ed.2d 807 (1989) (no error in charge that jury must find "that a mitigating circumstance exists if there is any substantial evidence to support it.") (emphasis added).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Shanks
See State v. Eaton, 524 So.2d 1194, 1208 (La.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 818 , 102 L.Ed.2d 807 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Sullivan
See Singleton v. Thigpen, 847 F.2d 668, 671 (11th Cir.1988) (rejecting petitioner’s claim that his confession should not have been admitted because evidence of his low IQ was not before the trial court when it determined that his confession was voluntary, since there was no evidence of coercive police tactics, which is a necessary predicate to a finding of involuntariness), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 822 , 102 L.Ed.2d 812 (1989); see also Connelly, 479 U.S. at 161, 167 (without evidence of police coercion, evidence that, at the time of his confession, petitioner was suffering fr…
discussed
Cited "see"
Atkins v. State
See Nichols v. State, 754 S.W.2d 185, 196 (Tex.Crim.App.1988), cer t. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 819 , 102 L.Ed.2d 808 (1989), overruled on other grounds by, Green v. State, 764 S.W.2d 242 , 247 n. 2 (Tex.Crim.App.1989), Harris v. State, 784 S.W.2d 5, 19 (Tex.Crim.App.1989), and Butler v. State, 830 S.W.2d 125, 130 (Tex.Crim.App.1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Joseph Bennard Nichols v. Wayne Scott, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Cross-Appellee
See Nichols v. State, 754 S.W.2d 185 (Tex.Crim.App.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 819 , 102 L.Ed.2d 808 (1989). 14 In May 1989, Nichols, now represented by new counsel, two attorneys of a leading Houston law firm, filed an 86-page application for habeas corpus in the Texas trial court.
cited
Cited "see"
Williamson v. Reynolds
See Munson v. State, 758 P.2d 324, 335 (Okla.Crim.App.1988), cer t. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 820 , 102 L.Ed.2d 809 (1989); Eddings v. State, 616 P.2d 1159, 1169 (Okla.Crim.App.1980).
examined
Cited "see"
Hawkins v. State
(4×)
See, Munson v. State, 758 P.2d 324 (Okl.Cr.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 820 , 102 L.Ed.2d 809 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Vance Roy Clark v. Michael Groose
See Stokes v. Armontrout, 851 F.2d 1085, 1092 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 823 , 102 L.Ed.2d 812 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Myres v. State
See King v. Lynaugh, 850 F.2d 1055, 1062 (5th Cir.1988) (en banc), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 820 , 102 L.Ed.2d 809 (1989) (Rubin, J., dissenting) (describing empirical studies in Georgia and Mississippi showing that jurors believe criminals become eligible for parole much sooner than they actually do).
cited
Cited "see"
Virgil Robert Uplinger v. Carl White
See Stokes v. Armontrout, 851 F.2d 1085, 1092 (8th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stanley E. Boyd v. Paul K. Delo
See Gilmore v. Armontrout, 861 F.2d 1061, 1065 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1114 , 109 S.Ct. 3176 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1037 (1989), and Stokes v. Armontrout, 851 F.2d 1085, 1092-93 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 823 , 102 L.Ed.2d 812 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Nichols v. Collins
See Nichols v. State, 754 S.W.2d 185 (Tex.Crim.App.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 819 , 102 L.Ed.2d 808 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Boyd v. State
(2×)
See Munson v. State, 758 P.2d 324, 335 (Okl.Cr. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 820 , 102 L.Ed.2d 809 (1989); Fisher v. State, 736 P.2d 1003, 1010 (Okl.Cr. 1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1061 , 108 S.Ct. 2833 , 100 L.Ed.2d 933 (1988); VanWoundenberg v. State, 720 P.2d 328, 336 (Okl.Cr. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 956 , 107 S.Ct. 447 , 93 L.Ed.2d 395 (1986); Liles v. State, 702 P.2d 1025, 1031 (Okl.Cr. 1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1164 , 106 S.Ct. 2291 , 90 L.Ed.2d 732 (1986). [1] Appellant further alleges that the aggravating circumstances concerning heinous, atrocious or crue…
cited
Cited "see"
Byrd v. State
See Van Cleave v. State (1987), Ind., 517 N.E.2d 356, 361 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 819 , 102 L.Ed.2d 808 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. City of Seward
See Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. v. General Cinema Corp., 850 F.2d 477, 482 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 817 , 102 L.Ed.2d 806 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Associated Builders And Contractors, Inc. v. City Of Seward
See Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. v. General Cinema Corp., 850 F.2d 477, 482 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 817 , 102 L.Ed.2d 806 (1989). 5 * We first address the Contractors' preemption argument that the NLRA prohibits Seward from enforcing the work preservation clause in its CBA with the IBEW. 6 In Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los Angeles, 475 U.S. 608 , 106 S.Ct. 1395 , 89 L.Ed.2d 616 (1986), the Supreme Court summarized its NLRA preemption case law.
cited
Cited "see"
Connelly v. Derwinski
See Harkins Amusement Enters., Inc. v. General Cinema Corp., 850 F.2d 477 , 482 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 817 , 102 L.Ed.2d 806 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Connelly v. Derwinski
See Harkins Amusement Enters., Inc. v. General Cinema Corp., 850 F.2d 477 , 482 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 817 , 102 L.Ed.2d 806 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation
See Harkins Amusement Enters., Inc. v. General Cinema Corp., 850 F.2d 477 , 490 (9th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 817 , 102 L.Ed.2d 806 (1989) (recognizing that shared monopoly theory was “novel” and holding that no § 2 claim was stated “in this case,” but declining to adopt a general rule); cf. Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. United Airlines, Inc., 948 F.2d 536, 546-49 (9th Cir.1991) (rejecting “monopoly leveraging” doctrine under § 2).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lloyd Eugene Schlup v. Bill Armontrout, Warden
(2×)
See Stokes v. Armontrout, 851 F.2d 1085, 1095-96 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 823 , 102 L.Ed.2d 812 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Jewell Williamson v. Jim Jones
See Stokes v. Armontrout, 851 F.2d 1085, 1092-93 (8th Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 823 , 102 L.Ed.2d 812 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Banks v. State
(2×)
See Munson v. State. 758 P.2d 324 (Okl.Cr. 1988), cert. denied 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 820 , 102 L.Ed.2d 809 (1988); VanWhite v. State, 752 P.2d 814 (Okl.Cr. 1988); Johnson v. State, 731 P.2d 993, 1007 (Okl.Cr. 1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Derrick Moore v. Bill Armontrout
See Stokes v. Armontrout, 851 F.2d 1085, 1092 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 823 , 102 L.Ed.2d 812 (1989) (Strickland standard used to examine performance of petitioner’s 27.26 counsel).
cited
Cited "see"
DeBlanc v. State
See Nichols v. State, 754 S.W.2d 185, 193 (Tex.Cr.App.1988) cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 819 , 102 L.Ed.2d 808 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Hiler v. State
See Munson v. State, 758 P.2d 324, 333 (Okl.Cr.1988), cer t. denied 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 820 , 102 L.Ed.2d 809 (1989); 12 O.S. 1981 , § 2804(A)(4) and (B)(1).
discussed
Cited "see"
Shelton v. State
(2×)
See Munson v. State, 758 P.2d 324 (Okl.Cr. 1988), cert. denied 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 820 , 102 L.Ed.2d 809 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Delo v. Stokes
(2×)
See Stokes v. Armontrout, 851 F. 2d 1085 (CA8 1988), cert. denied, 488 U. S. 1019 (1989); Stokes v. Armontrout, 893 F. 2d 152 (CA8 1989), stay of execution denied, post, p. 926; Stokes v. Armontrout, No. 89-0133C(6) (ED Mo., Mar. 16, 1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jenkins v. State
(2×)
See, e.g., Nichols v. State, 754 S.W.2d 185, 189-91 (Tex.Cr.App. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 819 , 102 L.Ed.2d 808 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frederico Lowe-Bey v. Michael Groose
Flieger v. Delo, 16 F.3d 878, 885 (8th Cir.1994) (citing Boyd v. Groose, 4 F.3d 669, 671 (8th Cir.1993)); see also Stokes v. Armontrout, 851 F.2d 1085, 1092 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 823 , 102 L.Ed.2d 812 (1989) (Missouri petitioner’s failure to raise claim on appeal from the denial of his state post-conviction relief motion erected a procedural bar to federal habeas review of that claim).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McBride v. McBride
See also Carroll v. Moore, 228 Neb. 561 , 423 N.W.2d 757 (1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 102 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chuck Lee Mathenia v. Paul Delo
(2×)
See also State v. Smith, 756 S.W.2d 493 (Mo. banc 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 823 , 102 L.Ed.2d 812 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cleckler v. State
See also Singleton v. Thigpen , 847 F.2d 668 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied , 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 822 , 102 L.Ed.2d 812 (1989) (low intelligence of an accused is not a bar to admission of his statement); Smith v. State , 529 So.2d 1022 (Ala.Cr.App. 1987) (defendant's functional illiteracy goes to weight and credibility of confession, not its admissibility); Cliff v. State , 518 So.2d 786 (Ala.Cr.App. 1987), cert. denied (Ala. 1988) (defendant's low mentality goes to weight and credibility, not admissibility, of confession); Whittle v. State , 518 So.2d 793 (Ala.Cr.App. 1987), cert. denie…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arizona v. Standard Oil Co.
Monsanto, 465 U.S. at 764 , 104 S.Ct. at 1471 (plaintiff must “present direct or circumstantial evidence” that reasonably tends to prove that the defendants were engaged in a conspiracy rather than acting independently) (emphasis added); see also Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. v. General Cinema Corp., 850 F.2d 477, 485 (9th Cir.1988) (circumstantial evidence found to be sufficiently unambiguous under Monsanto), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 817 , 102 L.Ed.2d 806 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca9 1990
Monsanto, 465 U.S. at 764 , 104 S.Ct. at 1471 (plaintiff must "present direct or circumstantial evidence" that reasonably tends to prove that the defendants were engaged in a conspiracy rather than acting independently) (emphasis added); see also Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. v. General Cinema Corp., 850 F.2d 477, 485 (9th Cir.1988) (circumstantial evidence found to be sufficiently unambiguous under Monsanto ), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 817 , 102 L.Ed.2d 806 (1989). 17 We think that the key to the proper interpretation of Matsushita lies in the Court's emphasis on the dange…
Carroll
v.
Moore
v.
Moore
No. 88-786.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1989.
Sup. Ct. Neb. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.