green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
9.0 score
G Cite
cited 6× by 2 distinct cases ·
"Restitution awarded under the [Federal Probation Act] must relate to losses sustained by the victim as a result of the offense of which the defendant was actually convicted."
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“[Djisclosure of the identity or address of a confidential informant is not required unless the informant’s testimony is shown to be material to the defense.”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Shortly after the guilty verdict is the time to make an order of restitution.”
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
James City County, Virginia v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
But see Bersani v. Robichaud, 850 F.2d 36, 46 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1089 , 109 S.Ct. 1556 , 103 L.Ed.2d 859 (1989) (reviewing a section 404(c) veto decision by the EPA under the arbitrary and capricious standard).
discussed
Cited "but see"
James City County v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
But see Bersani v. Robichaud, 850 F.2d 36, 46 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1089 , 109 S.Ct. 1556 , 103 L.Ed.2d 859 (1989) (reviewing a section 404(c) veto decision by the EPA under the arbitrary and capricious standard).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Bruce J. Rice, and Rice Aircraft, Inc., United States of America v. Bruce Rice
shortly after the guilty verdict is the time to make an order of restitution.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Jimenez
djisclosure of the identity or address of a confidential informant is not required unless the informant's testimony is shown to be material to the defense.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
ca9 1991
restitution awarded under the must relate to losses sustained by the victim as a result of the offense of which the defendant was actually convicted.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Blue Mountain Bottling Co. of Walla Walla
restitution awarded under the must relate to losses sustained by the victim as a result of the offense of which the defendant was actually convicted.
discussed
Cited "see"
Crews v. Herbert
In order to obtain a missing witness charge under New York state law, the party seeking the charge must make a prima facie showing that “the uncalled witness is knowledgeable about a material issue upon which the evidence is already in the case; that the witness would naturally be expected to provide noncumulative testimony favorable to the party who has not called him, and that the witness is available to such party.” People v. Gonzalez, 68 N.Y.2d at 427 , 509 N.Y.S.2d 796 , 502 N.E.2d 583 ; accord People v. Kitching, 78 N.Y.2d 532, 536 , 577 N.Y.S.2d 231 , 583 N.E.2d 944 (N.Y.1991). “�…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Young
The Supreme Court recognizes, however, “a strong presumption that counsel’s conduct falls within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 ; see United States v. Rantz, 862 F.2d 808, 810 (10th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1089 , 109 S.Ct. 1554 , 103 L.Ed.2d 857 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Santiago
See United States v. Saa, 859 F.2d 1067, 1073 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1089 , 109 S.Ct. 1555 , 103 L.Ed.2d 858 (1988). *40 “The defendant is generally able to establish a right to disclosure ‘where the informant is a key witness or participant in the crime charged, someone whose testimony would be significant in determining guilt or innocence.’ ” Id. (quoting United States v. Russotti, 746 F.2d 945, 950 (2d Cir.1984)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alejandro J. Villalpando
See United States v. Hill, 864 F.2d 601, 603-04 (8th Cir.1988) (finding no prejudice from trial counsel’s errors where defendant’s own statements established his possession of firearms that formed the basis of the weapons possession charges against him), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1089 , 109 S.Ct. 1554 , 103 L.Ed.2d 857 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. A. J. Villalpando
See United States v. Hill, 864 F.2d 601, 603-04 (8th Cir. 1988) (finding no prejudice from trial counsel’s errors where defendant’s own statements established his possession of firearms that formed the basis of the weapons possession charges against him), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1089 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cosby
(2×)
See United States v. Rantz, 862 F.2d 808, 810 (10th Cir.1988) (citing United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648 , 104 S.Ct. 2039 , 80 L.Ed.2d 657 (1984)), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1089 , 109 S.Ct. 1554 , 103 L.Ed.2d 857 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Giakoumelos v. Coughlin
See United States v. Saa, 859 F.2d 1067, 1073 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1089 , 109 S.Ct. 1555 , 103 L.Ed.2d 858 (1989) (In a criminal trial “[t]he defendant is generally able to establish a right to disclosure [of an informant’s identity and testimony] where the informant is a key witness or participant in the crime charged, someone whose testimony would be significant in determining guilt or innocence.” (quotation omitted)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Giakoumelos v. Coughlin
See United States v. Saa, 859 F.2d 1067, 1073 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1089 , 109 S.Ct. 1555 , 103 L.Ed.2d 858 (1989) (In a criminal trial "[t]he defendant is generally able to establish a right to disclosure [of an informant's identity and testimony] where the informant is a key witness or participant in the crime charged, someone whose testimony would be significant in determining guilt or innocence." (quotation omitted)).
cited
Cited "see"
Steven W. Arnold v. United States
See United States v. Hill, 864 F.2d 601, 604 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1089 , 109 S.Ct. 1554 , 103 L.Ed.2d 857 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
James City County v. Environmental Protection Agency
See Bersani v. Robichaud, 850 F.2d 36, 46 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1089 , 109 S.Ct. 1556 , 103 L.Ed.2d 859 (applying arbitrary and capricious standard to EPA's Sec. 404(c) determination).
cited
Cited "see"
James City County v. Environmental Protection Agency
See Bersani v. Robichaud, 850 F.2d 36, 46 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1089 , 109 S.Ct. 1556 , 103 L.Ed.2d 859 (applying arbitrary and capricious standard to EPA's § 404(c) determination).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Manley
See United States v. Saa, 859 F.2d 1067, 1072-73 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1089 , 109 S.Ct. 1555 , 103 L.Ed.2d 858 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Katz v. Sullivan
Gutierrez v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 307 , 310 n. 3 (2d Cir.1990) (quoting McCuin, 817 F.2d at 174 ); see Bersani v. Robichaud, 850 F.2d 36, 45 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1089 , 109 S.Ct. 1556 , 103 L.Ed.2d 859 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hooshang Hooshmand
See United States v. Weir, 861 F.2d. 542, 545 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1089 , 109 S.Ct. 1555 , 103 L.Ed.2d 858 (1989); United States v. Condon, 816 F.2d 434, 435-36 (8th Cir.1987). *738 The plain language of Section 3622 states only that the district court “shall consider” the listed factors.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James E. Humphreys, Jr.
See United States v. Rantz, 862 F.2d 808, 814-15 (10th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1089 (1989); Federal Practice, supra, Sec. 524, at 78.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kevin Lynch
See also United States v. Saa, 859 F.2d 1067, 1073 (2d Cir.1988) (noting that possibility that informant could have cast doubt on a witness's general credibility is normally insufficient to compel disclosure), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1089 (1989) and 498 U.S. 870 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Steve Stevens
“The defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, -the result of the proceeding would have been different.” Id. at 1467-68 (citations omitted); see also United States v. Rantz, 862 F.2d 808, 810-11 (10th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1089 , 109 S.Ct. 1554 , 103 L.Ed.2d 857 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State of NY v. Sullivan
Ass’n, 463 U.S. at 42-43 , 103 S.Ct. at 2866 ; see also Bersani v. Environmental Protection Agency, 674 F.Supp. 405, 413 (N.D.N.Y. 1987), aff'd, 850 F.2d 36 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1089 , 109 S.Ct. 1556 , 103 L.Ed.2d 859 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Anthony Reid v. Daniel A. Senkowski, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility
"Whether a missing witness charge should be given lies in the sound discretion of the trial court.” United States v. Torres, 845 F.2d 1165, 1170-71 (2d Cir.1988) (citations omitted); see also United States v. Saa, 859 F.2d 1067, 1076 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1089 , 109 S.Ct. 1555 , 103 L.Ed.2d 858 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bryan James Carel
See United States v. Saucedo, 950 F.2d 1508, 1518 (10th Cir.1991); see also United States v. Rantz, 862 F.2d 808, 814-15 (10th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1089 (1989). 8 Defendant further contends, however, that his attorney provided ineffective assistance by failing to object to this information in the presentence report linking Defendant to the seized plane.
Moore
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 88-6559.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 20, 1989.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (3) · S.D. New York (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.