green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 5×
7.5 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lydon v. Boston Sand & Gravel Co.
he issues of federal preemption and removability largely merge.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Barrett v. United States Banknote Corp.
our analysis of relatedness and continuity has shifted from the enterprise element to the pattern element.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Maust v. Headley
it is by now well-established that in order to demonstrate a property interest worthy of protection under the fourteenth amendment's due process clause, a party may not simply rely upon the procedural guarantees of state law or local ordinance.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Maust v. Headley
it is by now well-established that in order to demonstrate a property interest worthy of protection under the fourteenth amendment's due process clause, a party may not simply rely upon the procedural guarantees of state law or local ordinance.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Patrick Carter Associates, Inc. v. Rent Stabilization Ass'n of N.Y.C., Inc.
congress's goal in fashioning its definition of 'pattern of racketeering activity' was to exclude from the reach of rico criminal acts that were merely 'isolated' or 'sporadic'____
discussed
Cited "see"
Bradshaw v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.
See Caterpillar, 482 U.S. at 399 , 107 S.Ct. at 2433 ; accord Smolarek v. Chrysler Corp., 879 F.2d 1326, 1334 (6th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 992 , 110 S.Ct. 539 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ellsworth Associates, Inc. v. United States
See Abrams v. Communications Workers of America, 702 F.Supp. 920, 925 (D.D.C.1988) (denying motion for injunction pending appeal where motion merely reasserted grounds for relief which were previously rejected), aff'd, 884 F.2d 628 (D.C.Cir.1989), ce rt. denied, 493 U.S. 992 , 110 S.Ct. 540 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Martin Jimeno, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Mobil Oil Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
See Smolarek v. Chrysler Corp., 879 F.2d 1326 (6th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 992 , 110 S.Ct. 539 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Update Traffic Systems, Inc. v. Gould
See Beauford v. Helmsley, 865 F.2d 1386, 1391 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 992 , 110 S.Ct. 539 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989); United States v. Indelicato, 865 F.2d 1370, 1381 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 811 , 110 S.Ct. 56 , 107 L.Ed.2d 24 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Kenneth D. Henegar v. William M. Banta
See Smolarek v. Chrysler Corp., 879 F.2d 1326 , 1334-35 n. 4 (6th Cir.)(en banc), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 992 , 110 S.Ct. 539 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Maguire v. Thompson
See Potts v. Department of Registration and Educ., 128 Ill.2d 322 , 131 Ill.Dec. 584 , 538 N.E.2d 1140 , cert. denied, 493 U.S. 992 , 110 S.Ct. 540 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Maguire v. Thompson
See Potts v. Department of Registration and Educ., 128 Ill.2d 322 , 131 Ill.Dec. 584 , 538 N.E.2d 1140 , cert. denied, 493 U.S. 992 , 110 S.Ct. 540 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO v. Rural Media Group, Inc.
See also Smolarek v. Chrysler Corp., 879 F.2d 1326, 1331 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 992 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Adamo Demolition Group v. International Union of Operating Engineers Local 150
See also Smolarek v. Chrysler Corp., 879 F.2d 1326 , 1331 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 992 , 110 S. Ct. 539 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gross v. Waywell
See, e.g., Beauford v. Helmsley, 865 F.2d 1386 (2d Cir.) (en banc), vacated and remanded, 492 U.S. 914 , 109 S.Ct. 3236 , 106 L.Ed.2d 584 , original decision adhered to, 893 F.2d 1433 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 992 , 110 S.Ct. 539 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989); cf. Shearson/American Express, Inc. v. McMahon, 482 U.S. 220, 239 , 107 S.Ct. 2332 , 96 L.Ed.2d 185 (1987) (noting that " '[T]he makings of a "pattern of racketeering” are not yet clear, but the fact remains that a "pattern” for civil purposes is "a pattern” for criminal purposes' ” (quoting Page v. Moseley, Hallgarten, Estabr…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wrobbel v. Asplundh Construction Corp.
See also, Smolarek v. Chrysler Corp., 879 F.2d 1326 (6th Cir.1989) (en banc), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 992 , 110 S.Ct. 539 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989) (holding that an employee’s state-law handicap discrimination claim that Chrysler illegally refused to return him to his former position because of his handicap was not preempted under § 301 even though Chrysler’s defense was that it had acted properly under the collective-bargaining agreement); O’Shea v. Detroit News, 887 F.2d 683 , 686-87 (6th Cir.1989) (plaintiffs Michigan age and handicap discrimination claim not preempted.).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Marva Huckabee v. Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation
Dist. , 856 S.W.2d 417, 418 (Tex. 1993); see also Cain v. Larson , 879 F.2d 1424, 1426 (7th Cir.), cert. denied , 493 U.S. 992 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Knox v. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp.
See also Smolarek v. Chrysler Corp., 879 F.2d 1326 (6th Cir.1989), ce rt. denied, 493 U.S. 992 , 110 S.Ct. 539 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989); Miller v. AT & T Network Systems, 850 F.2d 543 (9th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barsam v. Pure Tech International, Inc.
See also Beauford v. Helmsley, 865 F.2d 1386, 1391 (2d Cir.) (en banc) (“our analysis of relatedness and continuity has shifted from the enterprise element to the pattern element”), vacated and remanded, 492 U.S. 914 , 109 S.Ct. 3236 , 106 L.Ed.2d 584 , adhered to upon further consideration, 893 F.2d 1433 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 992 , 110 S.Ct. 539 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kube v. New Penn Motor Express, Inc.
Co., Inc., 860 F.2d 1514, 1517 (9th Cir.1988); see also Smolarek v. Chrysler Corp., 879 F.2d 1326, 1334 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 992 , 110 S.Ct. 539 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989) (claim for discrimination on the basis of a handicap involves purely factual questions concerning employer’s behavior and motivation; interpretation of the collective bargaining agreement is not required); Miller v. AT & T Network Sys., 850 F.2d 543, 547 (9th Cir.1988) (if mere overlap between mandatory state anti-discrimination provisions and labor contracts resulted in pre-emption of the state law, then § 30…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Decoe v. General Motors Corporation
See also Smolarek v. Chrysler Corp., 879 F.2d 1326, 1331 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 992 , 110 S.Ct. 539 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989). 24 In order to make the first determination, the court is not bound by the "well-pleaded complaint" rule, but rather, looks to the essence of the plaintiff's claim, in order to determine whether the plaintiff is attempting to disguise what is essentially a contract claim as a tort.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
DeCoe v. General Motors Corp.
See also Smolarek v. Chrysler Corp., 879 F.2d 1326, 1331 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 992 , 110 S.Ct. 539 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Crespo v. Candela Laser Corp.
See also Smolarek v. Chrysler Corp., 879 F.2d 1326, 1330 (6th Cir.) (“The fact that a defendant might ultimately prove that a plaintiff’s claims are preempted under the NLRA does not establish that they are removable to federal court.” [citing Caterpillar, 482 U.S. at 398 , 107 S.Ct. at 2432 ] [emphasis in Smolarek], cert. denied, 493 U.S. 992 [ 110 S.Ct. 539 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989)]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Landy v. Heller, White & Co.
Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co., 492 U.S. 229, 239 , 109 S.Ct. 2893, 2900 , 106 L.Ed.2d 195 (1989); see also Beauford v. Helmsley, 865 F.2d 1386, 1390-91 (2d Cir.) (en banc), vacated, 492 U.S. 914 , 109 S.Ct. 3236 , 106 L.Ed.2d 584 and adhered to, 893 F.2d 1433 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 992 , 110 S.Ct. 539 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989).
United States
v.
Washington, Individually and as Guardian ad Litem for Washington, a Minor
v.
Washington, Individually and as Guardian ad Litem for Washington, a Minor
No. 89-482.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 4, 1989.
493 U.S. 992
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.