green
Positive treatment
6.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
ca3 1996
See, e.g., United States v. Powe, 9 F.3d 68 (9th Cir.1993); United States v. Ryans, 903 F.2d 731 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 855 , 111 S.Ct. 152 , 112 L.Ed.2d 118 (1990); United States v. Sutton, 801 F.2d 1346 (D.C.Cir.1986); United States v. Dobbs, 711 F.2d 84 (8th Cir.1983); United States v. Weiss, 599 F.2d 730 (5th Cir.1979); But see United States v. Hammad, 858 F.2d 834 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 871 , 111 S.Ct. 192 , 112 L.Ed.2d 154 (1990).
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Balter
See, e.g., United States v. Powe, 9 F.3d 68 (9th Cir.1993); United States v. Ryans, 903 F.2d 731 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 855 , 111 S.Ct. 152 , 112 L.Ed.2d 118 (1990); United States v. Sutton, 801 F.2d 1346 (D.C.Cir.1986); United States v. Dobbs, 711 F.2d 84 (8th Cir.1983); United States v. Weiss, 599 F.2d 730 (5th Cir. 1979); But see United States v. Hammad, 858 F.2d 834 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 871 , 111 S.Ct. 192 , 112 L.Ed.2d 154 (1990).
cited
Cited "but see"
State v. Decker
But see United States v. Hammad, 858 F.2d 834, 842 (2d Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 871 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Cummings
(2×)
See State v. Leroux, 326 N.C. 368, 384 , 390 S.E.2d 314, 325 (stating that "counsel is not permitted to `fish' for legal conclusions or argue its case during voir dire "), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 871 , 111 S.Ct. 192 , 112 L.Ed.2d 155 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Oberoi
See United States v. Hammad, 902 F.2d 1062, 1064 (2d Cir.) (holding that defense counsel’s motion to withdraw was disposed of when new counsel was substituted and therefore exclusion of the entire time was appropriate under § 3161(h)(1)(F)), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 871 , 111 S.Ct. 192 , 112 L.Ed.2d 154 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sims
See United States v. Nabors, 901 F.2d 1351, 1356 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 871 , 111 S.Ct. 192 , 112 L.Ed.2d 154 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Davis
See State v. Leroux, 326 N.C. 368, 378 , 390 S.E.2d 314, 322 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 871 , 112 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Godley
(2×)
See State v. Leroux, 326 N.C. 368, 384 , 390 S.E.2d 314, 325 (trial court’s restriction of questions not an abuse of discretion when defendant had an opportunity to gain the information sought by asking permitted questions), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 871 , 112 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Braxton
See State v. Leroux, 326 *175 N.C. 368, 378, 390 S.E.2d 314, 322 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 871 , 112 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Longo
See United States v. Hammad, 858 F.2d 834, 837-38 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 871 , 111 S.Ct. 192 , 112 L.Ed.2d 154 (1990); United States v. Jamil, 707 F.2d 638, 645 (2d Cir.1983); United States v. Scozzafava, 833 F.Supp. 203, 208 (W.D.N.Y.1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
US Ex Rel. O'Keefe v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.
See United States v. Hammad, 858 F.2d 834, 838 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 871 , 111 S.Ct. 192 , 112 L.Ed.2d 154 (1990). [6] The terms "represented person" and "represented party" are defined in § 77.3. [7] This regulation is not the DOJ's first attempt to exempt its attorneys from compliance with state ethical rules.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Barbara Copeland
See, United States v. Nabors, 901 F.2d 1351, 1354 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 871 (1990); United States v. Kennedy, 32 F.3d 876 (4th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 939 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Victor L. Brooks
See United States v. Nabors, 901 F.2d 1351, 1356 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 871 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Delta Lee Eady
See United States v. Nabors, 901 F.2d 1351, 1354 (6th Cir.) cert. denied, 498 U.S. 871 (1990) (exigent circumstances existed where defendant (1) was suspected of trafficking in narcotics, (2) was a felon "in the possession of an array of firearms," and (3) habitually wore a bullet-proof vest). 9 Finally, we are without jurisdiction to consider the defendant's argument that the 211 month sentence was excessive.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Jones
See State v. Leroux, 326 N.C. 368 , 390 S.E.2d 314 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 871 , 112 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Scozzafava
See United States v. Hammad, 858 F.2d 834, 837-38 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 871 , 111 S.Ct. 192 , 112 L.Ed.2d 154 (1990); United States v. Jamil, 707 F.2d 638, 645 (2d Cir.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Barnett
See United States v. Hamad, 858 F.2d 834 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 871 , 111 S.Ct. 192 , 112 L.Ed.2d 154 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Gilbert, 06ca3055 (5-30-2007)
Instead, the officer must relate facts establishing that "the suspect was armed and likely to use a weapon or become violent." State v. Russell (June 30, 1998), Athens App. No. 97CA37, 1998 WL 357546 ; citing United States v. Bates (C.A. 1996), 84 F.3d 790 , 795 ; see, also, United States v. Nabors (C.A. 6, 1990), 901 F.2d 1351 , 1354 , cert. denied (1990), *Page 15 498 U.S. 871 , 111 S.Ct. 192 ; United States v. Spinelli (C.A. 2, 1988), 848 F.2d 26 , 30 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Alley, Unpublished Decision (4-28-1999)
Rather, the officer must relate facts establishing that "the suspect was armed and likely to use a weapon or become violent." United States v. Bates (C.A.6, 1996), 84 F.3d 790 , 795 ; see, also, United States v. Nabors (C.A.6, 1990), 901 F.2d 1351 , 1354 , certiorari denied (1990), 498 U.S. 871 , 111 S.Ct. 192 , 112 L.Ed.2d 154 ; United States v. Spinelli (C.A.2, 1988), 848 F.2d 26 , 30 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grievance Committee for the Southern District of New York v. Robert M. Simels
In re Snyder, 472 U.S. 634 , 645 n. 6, 105 S.Ct. 2874 , 2881 n. 6, 86 L.Ed.2d 504 (1985) (because “[fjederal courts admit and suspend attorneys as an exercise of their inherent power[,] the standards imposed are a matter of federal law.”); Cord v. Smith, 338 F.2d 516, 524 (9th Cir.1964) (“When an attorney appears before a federal court, he is acting as an officer of that court, and it is that court which must judge his conduct.”); see also United States v. Hammad, 858 F.2d 834, 837 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 871 , 111 S.Ct. 192 , 112 L.Ed.2d 154 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Brown
Id. at 293 , 298 S.E.2d at 658 ; see also State v. Leroux, 326 N.C. 368, 378-79 , 390 S.E.2d 314, 322 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 871 , 112 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Afnan Jerome Parker
See, e.g., United States v. Hammad, 902 F.2d 1062, 1064 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 871 , 111 S.Ct. 192 , 112 L.Ed.2d 154 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Leonard Taylor (92-4050) and Eugene N. Wilson (92-4058)
See also United States v. Nabors, 901 F.2d 1351 (6th Cir.) (two convictions in same indictment can trigger enhanced penalty), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 871 (1990); United States v. Raynor, 939 F.2d 191, 194 (4th Cir.1991) (plea to two counts in the same indictment charging violations of Sec. 924(c) triggers enhanced penalty). 43 The Supreme Court recently upheld the principles set forth in Livingston, Nabors, and Raynor in Deal v. United States, 113 S.Ct. 1993 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ribe
See also United States v. Nabors, 901 F.2d 1351, 1354 (6th Cir.) (evidence procured in violation of § 3109 "must be suppressed”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 871 , 111 S.Ct. 192 , 112 L.Ed.2d 154 (1990); United States v. Singer, 943 F.2d 758, 762 (7th Cir.1991) (violation of § 3109 excused only if exigent circumstances exist which justify failure to comply). . "[R]ule[s] of criminal procedure” is the term used in State v. Rowe, 850 P.2d 427, 429 (Utah 1992), and State v. Fixel, 744 P.2d 1366, 1368 (Utah 1987), to refer to the "procedural” statutes violated by the police in those two cases. …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. McNaughton
Compare United States v. Hammad, 858 F.2d 834 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 871 , 111 S.Ct. 192 , 112 L.Ed.2d 154 (1990) with United States v. Ryans, 903 F.2d 731, 735 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 855 , 111 S.Ct. 152 , 112 L.Ed.2d 118 (1990). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Attaway
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Nabors, 901 F.2d 1351, 1354 (6th Cir.) (holding suppression not required under federal statute when officers waited only briefly after announcement before forcible entry when police knew that defendant was suspected of trafficking in narcotics, was a felon in possession of "an array of firearms," and wore a bullet proof vest), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 871 , 111 S.Ct. 192 , 112 L.Ed.2d 154 (1990); see also Marvin O.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Poole v. United States
See United States v. Marts, 986 F.2d 1216, 1218 (8th Cir.1993) ("The reasonable belief that firearms may have been within the residence, standing alone, is clearly insufficient” to justify an otherwise improper entry under 18 U.S.C. § 3109 .); United States v. Fluker, 543 F.2d 709 , *1119 717 (9th Cir.1976) (fact that person believed to be inside apartment owned gun did not reasonably support belief that he was armed and constituted a threat, where there was no evidence that he had ever been convicted of illegal possession of firearms or of use of firearms in commission of crime); State v. …
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard Lee Heinz
(4×)
See e.g., United States v. Hammad, 858 F.2d 834, 840 (2d Cir.1988) (Kaufman, J.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 871 , 111 S.Ct. 192 , 112 L.Ed.2d 154 (1990). 1 In short: my conclusion that DR 7-104(A)(l) applies to the facts before us, and counsels suppression of the tape recorded “conversations” between Mitchell and Heinz, has never been addressed — let alone “explicitly rejected”— by other courts construing the Rule. 2 The peculiar, prosecutorial alter ego facts of this case make it a truly exceptional one.
Chandler
v.
White
v.
White
No. 90-5304.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1990.
498 U.S. 871
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.