green
Positive treatment
5.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Valdez
See United States v. Dobynes, 905 F.2d 1192, 1196-97 (8th Cir. [1990]) (holding that Batson challenge raised for the first time after trial was untimely in part because only remedy after trial is vacating the conviction), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 877 , 111 S.Ct. 206 , 112 L.Ed.2d 167 (1990); United States v. Forbes, 816 F.2d 1006, 1011 (5th Cir.1987)(‘‘The 'timely objection’ rule is designed to prevent defendants from 'sandbagging’ the prosecution by waiting until trial has concluded unsatisfactorily before insisting on an explanation for jury strikes that by then the prosecutor may larg…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Forriss D. Elliott
See United States v. Dobynes, 905 F.2d 1192, 1196-97 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 877 , 111 S.Ct. 206 , 112 L.Ed.2d 167 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Forriss D. Elliott
See United States v. Dobynes, 905 F.2d 1192, 1196-97 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 877 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
George McCrory v. Robert J. Henderson, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility, Hon. Robert Abrams, Attorney General of the State of New York
See United States v. Dobynes, 905 F.2d 1192, 1196-97 (8th Cir.)(holding that Batson challenge raised for the first time after trial was untimely in part because only remedy after trial is vacating the conviction), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 877 , 111 S.Ct. 206 , 112 L.Ed.2d 167 (1990); United States v. Forbes, 816 F.2d 1006, 1011 (5th Cir.1987) (“The ‘timely objection’ rule is designed to prevent defendants from ‘sandbagging’ the prosecution by waiting until trial has concluded unsatisfactorily before insisting on an explanation for jury strikes that by then the prosecutor may largely ha…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Teuscher
See United States v. Sykes, 977 F.2d 1242, 1246 (8th Cir.1992); accord United States v. Dobynes, 905 F.2d 1192, 1195 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 877 , 111 S.Ct. 206 , 112 L.Ed.2d 167 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jonfit Rodreiquez, Also Known as Jonfit Ramos
See United States v. Longbehn, 898 F.2d 635, 639-40 (8th Cir.) (in absence of request for contemporaneous limiting instruction, limiting instruction during final instructions not an abuse of district court's discretion), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 952 , and cert. denied, 498 U.S. 877 (1990). 6 Rodreiquez also asserts the district court erroneously admitted his coconspirators' testimony about Rodreiquez's drug-related activity before the date of the conspiracy charged in the indictment because the Government failed to give the notice required by Rule 404(b) for evidence of other crimes.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Prudhome
See United States v. Sullivan, 895 F.2d 1030 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 877, 111 S.Ct. 207 , 112 L.Ed.2d 168 (1990). 12 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Harmelin v. Michigan
(2×)
See United States v. Sullivan, 895 F. 2d 1030, 1031-1032 (CA5), cert. denied, 498 U. S. 877 (1990); United States v. Benefield, 889 F. 2d 1061, 1063-1065 (CA11 1989); United States v. Savage, 888 F. 2d 528 (CA7 1989), cert. denied, 495 U. S. 959 (1990); State v. Elbert, 125 N. H. 1, 15-16, 480 A. 2d 854, 862 (1984) (Souter, J.). [4] The two statutes also set forth penalties for those convicted based on lesser quantities of drugs.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Louisiana v. Lamondre Tucker
See Morning v. Zapata Protein (USA), Inc., 128 F.3d 213, 216 (4th Cir.1997). (finding that “a Batson challenge raised after the venire has been excused has been raised too late”); McCrory v. Henderson, 82 F.3d 1243, 1246-49 (2d Cir.1996) (finding Batson challenges are waived if not raised during jury selection); United States v. Forbes, 816 F.2d 1006, 1011 (5th Cir.1987) (finding that “[n]ow it is toó late for appellants to insist on an explanation they did not request at trial”); Government of the Virgin Islands v. Forte, 806 F.2d 73, 75-76 (3rd Cir.1986) (finding defendant “waived…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Robinson
See, e.g., United States v. Dobynes, 905 F.2d 1192, 1197 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 877 , 111 S. Ct. 206 , 112 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Newman Lee Wiley
See id.; see also United States v. Dobynes, 905 F.2d 1192 (8th Cir.) (holding that evidence of prior crimes relevant to knowledge and intent issues raised by defendants’ “mere presence defense”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 877 , 111 S.Ct. 206 , 112 L.Ed.2d 167 (1990); cf. United States v. Jenkins, 7 F.3d 803, 807 (8th Cir.1993) (holding that 404(b) evidence inadmissible to prove intent where intent not at issue).
Baugh
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 90-5501.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1990.
Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.