green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
12.8 score
G Cite
cited 6× by 2 distinct cases ·
"Having produced no evidence, Callahan failed to demonstrate any prejudice, or even that pretrial publicity actually existed, and the trial court properly denied his motion on that ground."
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State of Tennessee v. Michael Dale Rimmer
e also reject bell's argument that the jurors' knowledge of the previous death sentence diminished their sense of responsibility in deciding what sentence to impose.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Mario Rosales-Garcia v. J.T. Holland, Warden, Reynero Arteaga Carballo v. Mark Luttrell, Warden Immigration and Naturalization Service
(2×)
in analyzing 'the ends of justice,' a court may consider new arguments (based, for example, on intervening changes in the law) that a petitioner raises in support of an old claim.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jackson v. State
having produced no evidence, callahan failed to demonstrate any prejudice, or even that pretrial publicity actually existed, and the trial court properly denied his motion on that ground.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jackson v. State
having produced no evidence, callahan failed to demonstrate any prejudice, or even that pretrial publicity actually existed, and the trial court properly denied his motion on that ground.
discussed
Cited "see"
Whatley, Jermaine Eugene
See Sattiewhite v. State, 786 S.W.2d 271 , 4 290 (Tex.Crim.App.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 226 , 112 L.Ed.2d 181 (1990); see also Hughes v. State, 787 S.W.2d 193, 196 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1990, pet. ref'd); Simpson v. State, 119 S.W.3d 262, 272 (Tex. Crim.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Beverly
See State v. Deboue, 552 So.2d 355 (La.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 215 , 112 L.Ed.2d 174 (1990); State v. Williams, 445 So.2d 1171 (La.1984); and State v. Huizar, 414 So.2d 741 (La.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hernandez v. Thaler
See Sattiewhite v. State, 786 S.W.2d 271, 290-91 (Tex.Crim.App.1989) (holding trial court correctly excluded testimony of capital defendant’s proffered mental health expert regarding the appropriate punishment which should be imposed on the defendant), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 226 , 112 L.Ed.2d 181 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Prieto v. Com.
See Smith v. Commonwealth, 239 Va. 243, 267 , 389 S.E.2d 871, 884 (1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 221 , 112 L.Ed.2d 177 (1990), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 848 , 113 S.Ct. 142 , 121 L.Ed.2d 95 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Olden
See State v. Deboue, 552 So.2d 355, 362 (La. 1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 215 , 112 L.Ed.2d 174 (1990); State v. Williams, 445 So.2d 1171, 1180-81 (La. 1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Holmes
See State v. Deboue, 552 So.2d 355, 366 (La.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 215 , 112 L.Ed.2d 174 (1990) (while not claiming insanity at commission of the murders, defendant argued in vain that mental retardation rendered him incapable of forming specific intent for aggravated burglary of the murder victims’ home); State v. Nelson, 459 So.2d 510, 516-17 (La.1984), 471 U.S. 1030 , 105 S.Ct. 2050 , 85 L.Ed.2d 322 (1985) (no error 1^disallowing defense questions to psychiatrist designed to show the accused’s mental defect falling short of M’Naughten); State v. Lecompte, 371 So…
discussed
Cited "see"
Abu-Jamal v. Horn
(2×)
See Abu-Jamal v. Pennsylvania, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 215 , 112 L.Ed.2d 175 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
McNair v. Allen
(2×)
See Callahan v. Alabama, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 216 , 112 L.Ed.2d 176 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Terry v. Cross
See Giarratano v. Procunier, 891 F.2d 483 (4th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 222 , 112 L.Ed.2d 178 (1990); Waye v. Townley, 871 F.2d 18 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 491 U.S. 910 , 109 S.Ct. 3202 , 105 L.Ed.2d 710 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Miller v. Anderson
See Resnover v. State, 460 N.E.2d 922 (Ind.1984), ce rt. denied, Resnover v. Indiana, 469 U.S. 873 , 105 S.Ct. 231 , 83 L.Ed.2d 160 (1984), Resnover v. State, 547 N.E.2d 814 (Ind.1989) (denying post-conviction relief), cert denied, Resnover v. Indiana, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 216 , 112 L.Ed.2d 175 (1990) Resnover v. Pearson, 754 F.Supp. 1374 (N.D.Ind.1991) (denying habeas relief), aff'd, 965 F.2d 1453 (7th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 962 , 113 S.Ct. 2935 , 124 L.Ed.2d 685 (1993), and Smith v. State, 465 N.E.2d 1105 (Ind.1984), Smith v. Stale, 613 N.E.2d 412 (Ind.1993)(denying post-convi…
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael Jackson v. Arthur Calderon, Warden
(2×)
See People v. Jackson, 49 Cal.3d 1170 , 264 Cal.Rptr. 852 , 783 P.2d 211 (1989) (in bank), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 226 , 112 L.Ed.2d 181 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Williams
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. O’Shea, 523 Pa. 384, 407 , 567 A.2d 1023, 1034 (1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 225 , 112 L.Ed.2d 180 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Fryer v. State
See Sattiewhite v. State, 786 S.W.2d 271, 290-91 (Tex.Crim.App.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 226 , 112 L.Ed.2d 181 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. O'Shea
See O’Shea v. Pennsylvania, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 225 , 112 L.Ed.2d 180 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Burgess v. State
See Callahan v. State, 557 So.2d 1292, 1300 (Ala.Cr.App.1989), aff'd, 557 So.2d 1311 (Ala.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 216 , 112 L.Ed.2d 176 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Counterman
See Commonwealth v. Breakiron, 524 Pa. 282, 287 , 571 A.2d 1035, 1037 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 224 , 112 L.Ed.2d 179 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wright v. State
See Sattiewhite v. State, 786 S.W.2d 271, 290 (Tex.Crim.App.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 226 , 112 L.Ed.2d 181 (1990); see also Hughes v. State, 787 S.W.2d 193, 196 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1990, pet. ref'd).
cited
Cited "see"
Bush v. State
See Sattiewhite v. State, 786 S.W.2d 271, 284 (Tex.Crim.App.1989), ce rt. denied, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 226 , 112 L.Ed.2d 181 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Carlton
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. O’Shea, 523 Pa. 384 , 567 A.2d 1023 (1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 225 , 112 L.Ed.2d 180 (1990) (this Court may affirm a suppression ruling based on any legitimate grounds for the admissibility of the challenged evidence).
cited
Cited "see"
Beck v. Commonwealth
See Smith v. Commonwealth, 239 Va. 243, 268, 389 S.E.2d 871, 885 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 881 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
White v. State
(2×)
See State v. McMillin, 783 S.W.2d 82,101-02 (Mo. banc 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 225 , 112 L.Ed.2d 179 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Bryan Keith Johnson v. Commonwealth
See Smith v. Commonwealth, 239 Va. 243, 259-60 , 389 S.E.2d 871, 879-80 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 881 (1990); Bowling v. Commonwealth, 12 Va. App. 166, 174 , 403 S.E.2d 375, 378-79 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Williams v. State
See State v. Green, 301 S.C. 347 , 392 S.E.2d 157, 163 (1990) cert. denied, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 229 , 112 L.Ed.2d 183 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Adams
(2×)
Lyle, 125 S.C. at 416 , 118 S.E. at 807 ; accord State v. Bell, 302 S.C. 18 , 393 S.E. (2d) 364 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 227 , 112 L.Ed. (2d) 182 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Johnson
See Commonwealth v. Abu-Jamal, 521 Pa. 188, 195-96 , 555 A.2d 846, 849 (1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 215 , 112 L.Ed.2d 175 (1990) (failure to allege discriminatory use of peremptory challenges during voir dire results in waiver of Batson claim).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Ryan
See State v. Ryan, 233 Neb. 74 , 444 N.W.2d 610 (1989), cert. denied 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S. Ct. 216 , 112 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. McFadden
See State v. Bell, 302 S.C. 18 , 393 S.E. (2d) 364 , cert, denied, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 227 , 112 L.Ed. (2d) 182 (1990) (upholding the solicitor’s closing argument that the jury’s imposition of any sentence less than the death penalty would be a “cop-out” because, when reviewed in the context of the entire record, the comment was not a personal attack on the jurors and did not infect the trial with unfairness so as to deny the defendant due process); see also State v. Singleton, 284 S.C. 388 , 326 S.E (2d) 153, cert, denied, 471 U.S. 1111 , 105 S.Ct. 2346 , L.Ed. (2d) 863 (1985), o…
discussed
Cited "see"
Perry v. State
See Moore v. State, 788 P.2d 387, 398 (Okl.Cr.), ce rt. denied, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 227 , 112 L.Ed.2d 182 (1990) ("admission of expert testimony on microscopic comparison of hair and/or fiber samples has been implicitly, if not explicitly, approved”). .
cited
Cited "see"
Landry v. Hilton Head Plantation Property Owners Ass'n
See State v. Bell, 302 S.C. 18 , 393 S.E. (2d) 364 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 227 , 112 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Wilson
See Commonwealth v. Abu-Jamal, 521 Pa. 188 , 555 A.2d 846 (1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 215 , 112 L.Ed.2d 175 (1990); Commonwealth v. Hardcastle, 519 Pa. 236 , 546 A.2d 1101 (1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1093 , 110 S.Ct. 1169 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1072 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. McCandless
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. O’Shea, 523 Pa. at 397 , 567 A.2d at 1029 (1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 225 , 112 L.Ed.2d 180 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dan Edward Routly, Cross-Appellee v. Harry K. Singletary, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
See Scott v. Dugger, 891 F.2d 800 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 224 , 112 L.Ed.2d 179 (1990) (counsel not ineffective for failure to cross-examine and present impeaching evidence); Jones v. Smith, 772 F.2d 668 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1073 , 106 S.Ct. 838 , 88 L.Ed.2d 809 (1986) (counsel not ineffective where counsel made tactical choice not to make opening argument).
cited
Cited "see"
MacK v. State
See Sattiewhite v. State, 786 S.W.2d 271 , 283-84 n. 4 (Tex.Crim.App.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 226 , 112 L.Ed.2d 181 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Marshall
See Commonwealth v. Abu-Jamal, 521 Pa. 188 , 555 A.2d 846 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 215 , 112 L.Ed.2d 175 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Spence
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. Lambert, 529 Pa. 320 , 603 A.2d 568 (1992), and Commonwealth v. Abu-Jamal, 521 Pa. 188 , 555 A.2d 846 (1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 215 , 112 L.Ed.2d 175 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Page v. State
(2×)
See Lowery v. State (1989), Ind., 547 N.E.2d 1046 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 217 , 112 L.Ed.2d 176 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Scarbrough v. State
See Callahan v. State , 557 So.2d 1292 , 1302-03 (Ala.Cr.App.) (initial arrest for traffic offense not invalid because there existed probable cause to arrest for murder), affirmed, 557 So.2d 1311 (Ala. 1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 216 , 112 L.Ed.2d 176 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Jessie Derrell Williams v. State of Mississippi
See State v. Green, 392 S.E.2d 157, 163 (S.C. 1990) cert denied, 498 U.S. 881 (1990) . ¶93.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Ramsey, I.
Commonwealth v. Henry, 943 A.2d 967, 971-72 (Pa. Super. 2008), appeal denied, 959 A.2d 928 (Pa. 2008) (quotation marks and most citations omitted); see also O’Shea, 567 A.2d at 1030 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 881 (1990) (holding that “suppression of evidence may or may not be the -7- J-A18040-21 appropriate remedy for a violation of [MPJA]”); Commonwealth v. Borovichka, 18 A.3d 1242, 1250 (Pa. Super. 2011) (concluding that suppression for violation of MPJA was not warranted where it would “run afoul of the legislative intent behind the MPJA, which is to promote public safety, not to hind…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Hardy, J.
Commonwealth v. Henry, 943 A.2d 967, 971-72 (Pa. Super. 2008), appeal denied, 959 A.2d 928 (Pa. 2008) (quotation marks and most citations omitted); see also Commonwealth v. O’Shea, 567 A.2d 1023, 1030 (Pa. 1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 881 (1990) (“suppression of evidence may or may not be the appropriate remedy for a violation of [MPJA]”); Commonwealth v. Borovichka, 18 A.3d 1242, 1250 (Pa. Super. 2011) (suppression for violation of MPJA not warranted where it would “run afoul of the legislative intent behind the MPJA, which is to promote public safety, not to hinder law enforcement a…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Barnes
Id. at 193 , 642 S.E.2d at 561 ; see also State v. Green, 301 S.C. 347, 355 , 392 S.E.2d 157, 161 (1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 229 , 112 L.Ed.2d 183 (1990) (holding that a trial court’s disqualification of a prospective juror will not be disturbed where there is a reasonable basis from which the trial court could have concluded that the juror would not have been able to faithfully discharge his responsibilities as a juror under the law).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Ogrod
(2×)
See also, Commonwealth v. Abu-Jamal, 521 Pa. 188 , 555 A.2d 846 (1989) cert. denied, 498 U.S. 881 , 111 S.Ct. 215 , 112 L.Ed.2d 175 (1990) (evidence as to whether witness had advocated killing of police officers was admissible to show that the witness was biased against the officers).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jones v. State
(2×)
Most importantly, however, Jones cannot escape the underlying rationale of Romano : “We do not believe that the admission of evidence regarding petitioner’s prior death sentence affirmatively misled the jury regarding its role in the sentencing process so as to diminish its sense of responsibility.” Id. at 10 , 114 S.Ct. at 2010 , 129 L.Ed.2d at 11 ; see also State v. Bell, 302 S.C. 18, 24 , 393 S.E.2d 364, 368 (“[W]e also reject Bell’s argument that the jurors’ knowledge of the previous death sentence diminished their sense of responsibility in deciding what sentence to impose.”…
Deboue
v.
Louisiana Eyler v. Illinois Abu-Jamal v. Pennsylvania Jones v. Missouri Bradley v. Alabama Resnover v. Indiana Ryan v. Nebraska Callahan v. Alabama Davis v. Kemp, Warden Lowery v. Indiana Pitts v. Georgia Brewer v. Ohio Smith v. Virginia Hall v. Georgia Martin v. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections Giarratano v. Procunier, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections Lang v. California Breakiron v. Pennsylvania Scott v. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections Finney v. Kemp, Warden McMillin v. Missouri O'Shea v. Pennsylvania Collins v. Zant, Warden Thompson v. California Jackson v. California Sattiewhite v. Texas Gary v. Georgia Amrine v. Missouri Bell v. South Carolina Moore v. Oklahoma Fields v. Illinois Hawkins v. Illinois Franklin v. Illinois Jamison v. Ohio Green v. South Carolina Clemmons v. Missouri Powell v. Ohio Savino v. Virginia Hightower v. Georgia Reed v. Florida Weeks v. Alabama Canaan v. Indiana Jacobs v. Texas Moreland v. Ohio Schneider v. Missouri
v.
Louisiana Eyler v. Illinois Abu-Jamal v. Pennsylvania Jones v. Missouri Bradley v. Alabama Resnover v. Indiana Ryan v. Nebraska Callahan v. Alabama Davis v. Kemp, Warden Lowery v. Indiana Pitts v. Georgia Brewer v. Ohio Smith v. Virginia Hall v. Georgia Martin v. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections Giarratano v. Procunier, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections Lang v. California Breakiron v. Pennsylvania Scott v. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections Finney v. Kemp, Warden McMillin v. Missouri O'Shea v. Pennsylvania Collins v. Zant, Warden Thompson v. California Jackson v. California Sattiewhite v. Texas Gary v. Georgia Amrine v. Missouri Bell v. South Carolina Moore v. Oklahoma Fields v. Illinois Hawkins v. Illinois Franklin v. Illinois Jamison v. Ohio Green v. South Carolina Clemmons v. Missouri Powell v. Ohio Savino v. Virginia Hightower v. Georgia Reed v. Florida Weeks v. Alabama Canaan v. Indiana Jacobs v. Texas Moreland v. Ohio Schneider v. Missouri
No. 89-7188; No. 89-7355; No. 89-7430; No. 89-7444; No. 89-7468; No. 89-7473; No. 89-7476; No. 89-7491; No. 89-7570; No. 89-7577; No. 89-7616; No. 89-7617; No. 89-7632; No. 89-7638; No. 89-7640; No. 89-7661; No. 89-7672; No. 89-7719; No. 89-7732; No. 89-7786; No. 89-7793; No. 89-7806; No. 89-7835; No. 89-7839; No. 89-7884; No. 90-5003; No. 90-5015; No. 90-5027; No. 90-5029; No. 90-5051; No. 90-5066; No. 90-5328; No. 90-5109; No. 90-5123; No. 90-5148; No. 90-5152; No. 90-5171; No. 90-5211; No. 90-5217; No. 90-5222; No. 90-5236; No. 90-5297; No. 90-5305; No. 90-5444; No. 90-5453.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1990.
Marshall.
Cited by 160 opinions | Published
Lead Opinion
[*881] Sup. Ct. La.;
Sup. Ct. Ill.;
Sup. Ct. Pa.;
Sup. Ct. Mo.;
Sup. Ct. Ala.;
Sup. Ct. Ind.;
Sup. Ct. Neb.;
Sup. Ct. Ala.;
Sup. Ct. Ga.;
Sup. Ct. Ind.;
Sup. Ct. Ga.;
Sup. Ct. Ohio;
Sup. Ct. Va.;
Sup. Ct. Ga.;
C. A. 11th Cir.;
C. A. 4th Cir.;
Sup. Ct. Cal.;
Sup. Ct. Pa.;
C. A. 11th Cir.;
Sup. Ct. Ga.;
Sup. Ct. Mo.;
Sup. Ct. Pa.;
C. A. 11th Cir.;
Sup. Ct. Cal.;
Sup. Ct. Cal.;
Ct. Crim. App. Tex.;
Sup. Ct. Ga.;
Sup. Ct. Mo.;
Sup. Ct. S. C.;
Ct. Crim. App. Okla.;
Sup. Ct. Ill.;
Sup. Ct. Ill.;
Sup. Ct. Ill.;
Sup. Ct. Ohio;
Sup. Ct. S. C.;
Sup. Ct. Mo.;
Sup. Ct. Ohio;
Sup. Ct. Va.;
Sup. Ct. Ga.;
Sup. Ct. Fla.;'
Ct. Crim. App. Ala.;
Sup. Ct. Ind.;
Ct. Crim. App. Tex.;
Sup. Ct. Ohio; and
Sup. Ct. Mo. Certiorari denied. Reported below: No. 89-7188, 552 So. 2d 355; No. 89-7355, 133 Ill. 2d 173, 549 N. E. 2d 268; No. 89-7430, 521 Pa. 188, 555 A. 2d 846; No. 89-7444, 784 S. W. 2d 789; No. 89-7473, 547 N. E. 2d 814; No. 89-7476, 233 Neb. 74, 444 N. W. 2d 610; No. 89-7491, 557 So. 2d 1311; No. 89-7577, 547 N. E. 2d 1046; No. 89-7616, 259 Ga. 745, 386 S. E. 2d 351; No. 89-7617, 48 Ohio St. 3d 50, 549 N. E. 2d 491; No. 89-7632, 239 Va. 243, 389 S. E. 2d 871; No. 89-7638, 259 Ga. 412, 383 S. E. 2d 128; No. 89-7640, 891 F. 2d 807; No. 89-7661, 891 F. 2d 483; No. 89-7672, 49 Cal. 3d 991, 782 P. 2d 627; No. 89-7719, 524 Pa. 282, 571 A. 2d 1035; No. 89-7732, 891 F. 2d 800; No. 89-7793, 783 S. W. 2d 82; No. 89-7806, 523 Pa. 384, 567 A. 2d 1023; No. 89-7835, 892 F. 2d 1502; No. 89-7839, 50 Cal. 3d 134, 785 P. 2d 857; No. 89-7884, 49 Cal. 3d 1170, 783 P. 2d 211; No. 90-5003, 786 S. W. 2d 271; No. 90-5015, 260 Ga. 38, 389 S. E. 2d 218; No. 90-5027, 785 S. W. 2d 531; No. 90-5029, 302 S. C. 18, 393 S. E. 2d 364; No. 90-5051, 788 P. 2d 387; Nos. 90-5066 and 90-5328, 135 Ill. 2d 18, 552 N. E. 2d 791; No. 90-5109, 135 Ill. 2d 78, 552 N. E. 2d 743; No. 90-5123, 49 Ohio St. 3d 182, 552 N. E. 2d 180; No. 90-5148, 301 S. C. 347, 392 S. E. 2d 157; No. 90-5152, 785 S. W. 2d 524; No. 90-5171, 49 Ohio St. 3d 255, 552 N. E. 2d 191; No. 90-5211, 239 Va. 534, 391 S. E. 2d 276; No. 90-5217, 259 Ga. 770, 386 S. E. 2d 509; No. 90-5222, 560 So. 2d 203; No. 90-5236, 568 So. 2d 864; No. 90-5297, 541 N. E. 2d 894; No. 90-5305, 787 S. W. 2d 397; No. 90-5444, 50 Ohio St. 3d 58, 552 N. E. 2d 894; No. 90-5453, 787 S. W. 2d 718.
Dissent
dissenting.
Adhering to my view that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153,[*883] 231 (1976), I would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.