green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.0 score
“the structure of the statute as a whole does not permit such a construction”
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 31 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bevilacqua v. Bevilacqua
the structure of the statute as a whole does not permit such a construction
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Schroeder
Accord State v. Reeves, 234 Neb. 711 , 453 N.W.2d 359 , cert. granted and judgment vacated 498 U.S. 964 , 111 S. Ct. 425 , 112 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of the VWE Group, Inc. v. Amlicke (In Re VWE Group, Inc.)
See In re Ben Cooper, Inc., 896 F.2d 1394 , 1398 (2d Cir.) (Ben Cooper I), vacated and remanded, 498 U.S. 964 , 111 S.Ct. 425 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990), reinstated on remand, In re Ben Cooper, Inc. 924 F.2d 36 , 38 (2d Cir.)(Ben Cooper II).
discussed
Cited "see"
PSINet, Inc. v. Cisco Systems Capital Corp. (In Re PSINet, Inc.)
See Ben Cooper, Inc. v. The Insurance Co. of the State of Pennsylvania (In re Ben Cooper, Inc.), 896 F.2d 1394 (2d Cir.) ("Ben Cooper"), vacated and remanded, 498 U.S. 964 , 111 S.Ct. 425 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990), reinstated on remand, 924 F.2d 36 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 928 , 111 S.Ct. 2041 , 114 L.Ed.2d 126 (1991) (The language of § 157(b)(2)(A) "could be construed to include almost any matter relating to bankruptcy, but the structure of the statute as a whole does not permit such a construction”; the court attempts to make the general language of § 157(a)(2)(A) more concrete);…
discussed
Cited "see"
Northwestern Institute of Psychiatry, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co. (In Re Northwestern Institute of Psychiatry, Inc.)
See Ben Cooper, Inc. v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (In re Ben Cooper Inc.), 896 F.2d 1394 , 1399 (2d Cir.), certiorari granted and judgment vacated, 498 U.S. 964 , 111 S.Ct. 425 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990), opinion reinstated, 924 F.2d 36 (2d Cir. 1991) (§ 157(b)(3) demonstrates Congress' intent that bankruptcy courts are not precluded from adjudicating state-law claims where they are at the heart of the administration of the estate).
discussed
Cited "see"
1800Postcards, Inc. v. Morel
See In re Ben Cooper, Inc., 896 F.2d 1394 (2d Cir.), vacated and remanded, 498 U.S. 964 , 111 S.Ct. 425 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990), reinstated on remand, 924 F.2d 36 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 928 , 111 S.Ct. 2041 , 114 L.Ed.2d 126 (1991). 49 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Lines, Inc. v. American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection & Indemnity Ass'n
See Ben Cooper, Inc. v. Insurance Co. (In re Ben Cooper, Inc.), 896 F.2d 1394, 1399-1400 (2d Cir.), vacated on other grounds, 498 U.S. 964 , 111 S.Ct. 425 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990), opinion reinstated, 924 F.2d 36 (2d Cir.1991).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re United States Lines, Inc.
See Ben Cooper, Inc. v. Insurance Co. (In re Ben Cooper, Inc.), 896 F.2d 1394 , 1399-1400 (2d Cir.), vacated on other grounds, 498 U.S. 964 (1990), opinion reinstated, 924 F.2d 36 (2d Cir. 1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Peterson v. 610 W. 142 Owners Corp. (In Re 610 W. 142 Owners Corp.)
See Seatrain Lines, 198 B.R. at 50 (citing In re Ben Cooper, Inc., 896 F.2d 1394 , 1402 (2d Cir.), vacated and remanded, 498 U.S. 964 , 111 S.Ct. 425 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990), reinstated on remand, 924 F.2d 36 (2d Cir.1991)).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Albion Disposal, Inc.
See In re Ben Cooper, Inc., 896 F.2d 1394, 1398-1399 (2d Cir.), vacated, 498 U.S. 964 , 111 S.Ct. 425 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990), reinstated, 924 F.2d 36 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 928 , 111 S.Ct. 2041 , 114 L.Ed.2d 126 (1991); In re Harbor Park Associates Ltd.
discussed
Cited "see"
Volpert v. Ellis (In Re Volpert)
See In re Melendez, 153 B.R. 386, 389 (Bankr.D.Conn.1993) (quoting In re Ben Cooper, Inc., 896 F.2d 1394 , 1398 (2d Cir.), vacated, 498 U.S. 964 , 111 S.Ct. 425 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990), reinstated, 924 F.2d 36 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 928 , 111 S.Ct. 2041 , 114 L.Ed.2d 126 (1991) ("The statements of several influential legislators [with respect to BAFJA] ... indicate that bankruptcy jurisdiction was to be construed as broadly as possible within the constitutional constraints of Marathon.”)). 16 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Hoffman v. Ramirez (In Re Astroline Communications Co.)
See In re Ben Cooper, 896 F.2d 1394 , 1398 (2d Cir.) (adopting the First Circuit’s analysis of legislative history “ ‘that Congress intended that core proceedings would be interpreted broadly, close to or congruent with constitutional limits.’ ”) (quoting In re Arnold Print Works, Inc., 815 F.2d 165, 168 (1st Cir.1987)), cert. granted, 497 U.S. 1023 , 110 S.Ct. 3269 , 111 L.Ed.2d 779 , vacated and remanded, 498 U.S. 964 , 111 S.Ct. 425 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 2041 , 114 L.Ed.2d 126 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Orion Pictures Corporation, Debtor, Orion Pictures Corporation v. Showtime Networks, Inc., Formerly Known as Showtime/the Movie Channel, Inc.
See In re Ben Cooper, Inc., 896 F.2d 1394 , 1398 (2d Cir.) (Ben Cooper I), vacated and remanded, 498 U.S. 964 , 111 S.Ct. 425 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990), reinstated on remand, Ben Cooper II, supra. Section 157 classifies matters as either “core proceedings,” which the bankruptcy court may- “hear and determine” and on which the *1101 court “may enter appropriate orders and judgments,” § 157(b)(1), or “non-core proceedings,” which the bankruptcy court may hear, but for which the bankruptcy court is only empowered to submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law to the di…
discussed
Cited "see"
Braunstein v. Dickinson (In Re Chestnut Hill Mortgage Corp.)
See In re Ben Cooper, Inc., 896 F.2d 1394 , 1402-1403 (2d Cir.1990), cert. granted, 497 U.S. 1023 , 110 S.Ct. 3269 , 111 L.Ed.2d 779 (1990), judgment vacated and remanded, 498 U.S. 964 , 111 S.Ct. 425 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990), opinion reinstated, 924 F.2d 36 (2d Cir. 1991), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 2041 , 114 L.Ed.2d 126 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Martino v. Weisman (In Re Elegant Equine, Inc.)
See In re Ben Cooper, Inc., 896 F.2d 1394 , 1400 (2d Cir.), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 498 U.S. 964 , 111 S.Ct. 425 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990, reinstated, 924 F.2d 36 (2d Cir.1991)) (postpetition contract claims are core); In re Arnold Print Works, 815 F.2d 165, 168 (1st Cir.1987) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nieves v. Melendez (In Re Melendez)
See Ben Cooper, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of the State of Pennsylvania (In re Ben Cooper, Inc.), 896 F.2d 1394, 1398 (2d Cir.), vacated, 498 U.S. 964 , 111 S.Ct. 425 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990), reinstated, 924 F.2d 36 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 5.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Buena Vista Television v. Adelphia Communications Corp. (In Re Adelphia Communications Corp.)
See, e.g., Ben Cooper, Inc. v. The Insurance Co. of the State of Pennsylvania (In re Ben Cooper, Inc.), 896 F.2d 1394, 1399 (2d Cir.) ("Ben Cooper"), vacated and remanded, 498 U.S. 964 , 111 S.Ct. 425 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990), reinstated on remand, 924 F.2d 36 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 928 , 111 S.Ct. 2041 , 114 L.Ed.2d 126 (1991); Resolution Trust Corp. v. Best Products Co. (In re Best Products Co.), 68 F.3d 26 , 31 (2d Cir.1995) ("Best Products"). 38 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Porter v. NationsCredit Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Porter)
See, e.g., In re Ben Cooper, Inc., 896 F.2d 1394 , 1399 (2d Cir.), vacated on other grounds, 498 U.S. 964 , 111 S.Ct. 425 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990), opinion reinstated, 924 F.2d 36 (2d Cir.), and cert. denied, 500 U.S. 928 , 111 S.Ct. 2041 , 114 L.Ed.2d 126 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ellenberg v. Griffin (In re Midland Mechanical Contractors, Inc.)
See Arnold Print Works, 815 F.2d at 165-66 ; see also In re Ben Cooper, Inc., 896 F.2d 1394 , 1400 (2d Cir.1990), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 498 U.S. 964 , 111 S.Ct. 425 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990), reinstated, 924 F.2d 36 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 928 , 111 S.Ct. 2041 , 114 L.Ed.2d 126 (1991); LTV Aerospace and Defense Ind. v. Thomson-CSF, S.A.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Weiner's, Inc. v. T.G. & Y. Stores Co.
See, e.g., In re Ben Cooper, Inc., 896 F.2d 1394 , 1399-1400 (2d Cir.1990), vacated on other grounds by Insurance Co. of State of Pennsylvania v. Ben Cooper, Inc., 498 U.S. 964 , 111 S.Ct. 425 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990), reinstated by In re Ben Cooper, Inc., 924 F.2d 36 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 928 , 111 S.Ct. 2041 , 114 L.Ed.2d 126 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Landscape Properties, Inc., Debtor in Possession v. Robert A. Vogel, Richard C. Downing, Joe D. Whisenhunt, Wingfield Martin Milton T. Schaeffer
Although we held that the bankruptcy court had no statutory authority to conduct jury trials, “[w]e agree[d] with the bankruptcy judge that the Bank has a constitutional right to a jury trial under Granfinanciera.” United Mo. Bank, 901 F.2d at 1450, n. 5 ; see also id. at 1455 (“Granfinan-ciera, however, requires that a jury trial be provided in this case.”) Although we disagreed with the holding in In re Ben Cooper, Inc., 896 F.2d 1394 (2d Cir.), vacated on other grounds, 498 U.S. 964 , 111 S.Ct. 425 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990) reinstated, 924 F.2d 36 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 9…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re S.G. Phillips Constructors, Inc.
See, e.g., In re Ben Cooper, Inc., 896 F.2d 1394 , 1399-1400 (2d Cir.), vacated, 498 U.S. 964 , 111 S.Ct. 425 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990), reinstated, 924 F.2d 36 (2d Cir.1991); In re Manville, 896 F.2d at 1389-90 ; In re Arnold, 815 F.2d at 166 ; cf. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. Schor, 478 U.S. 833, 852-53 , 106 S.Ct. 3245, 3257-58 , 92 L.Ed.2d 675 (1986). 20 In addition, another crucial factor distinguishing Marathon from the present case is that in Marathon, the state common-law claim arose prepetition, but the debtor brought it postpetition in bankruptcy court against a defendant who h…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
S.G. Phillips Constructors, Inc. v. City of Burlington (In re S.G. Phillips Constructors, Inc.)
See, e.g., In re Ben Cooper, Inc., 896 F.2d 1394, 1399-1400 (2d Cir.), vacated, 498 U.S. 964 , 111 S.Ct. 425 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990), reinstated, 924 F.2d 36 (2d Cir.1991); In re Manville, 896 F.2d at 1389-90 ; In re Arnold, 815 F.2d at 166 ; cf. Commodity Futures Trading Comm’n v. Schor, 478 U.S. 833, 852-53 , 106 S.Ct. 3245, 3257-58 , 92 L.Ed.2d 675 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. Lynco-Electric Co. (In Re El Paso Refinery, L.P.)
Granfinanciera, 492 U.S. at 50 , 109 S.Ct. at 2794-95 ; see also In re Ben Cooper, 896 F.2d 1394 (2nd Cir.1990), cert. granted, 497 U.S. 1023 , 110 S.Ct. 3269 , 111 L.Ed.2d 779 , cert. vacated and remanded, 498 U.S. 964 , 111 S.Ct. 425 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 , previous op. reinstated, 924 F.2d 36 (2nd Cir.) cert. denied, 500 U.S. 928 , 111 S.Ct. 2041 , 114 L.Ed.2d 126 (1991) (Supreme Court again declined to determine whether bankruptcy courts could conduct jury trials).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bernheim v. Chubb Insurance Co. of Canada
(2×)
In re Castlerock Properties, 781 F.2d 159, 162 (9th Cir. 1986). 2 The First Circuit, in contrast, has taken the opposite view, interpreting “ ‘core proceedings’ ... broadly, close to or congruent with constitutional limits.” In re Arnold Print Works, Inc., 815 F.2d 165, 168 (1st Cir.1987); see also In re Ben Cooper, Inc., 896 F.2d 1394 , 1399-1400 (2d Cir.) (generally espousing broad interpretation of core proceedings), cert. granted, 497 U.S. 1023 , 110 S.Ct. 3269 , 111 L.Ed.2d 779 , vacated and remanded, 498 U.S. 964, 111 S.Ct. 425 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990), reinstated, 924 F.2d 36 (2…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Busch-Provo, Ltd. v. Sloan (In Re Larsen)
Compare In re United Missouri Bank of Kansas City, N.A., 901 F.2d 1449, 1456-57 (8th Cir.1990) (bankruptcy courts lack power to conduct jury trials) with Ben Cooper, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania (In re Ben Cooper, Inc.), 896 F.2d 1394, 1403-04 (2nd Cir.) (bankruptcy courts have power to conduct jury trials in core proceedings), rev’d on other grounds, 498 U.S. 964 , 111 S.Ct. 425 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990), original opinion reinstated on remand, 924 F.2d 36 , 38 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 928 , 111 S.Ct. 2041 , 114 L.Ed.2d 126 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fedders North America, Inc. v. Branded Products, Inc. (In Re Branded Products, Inc.)
Compare In re Ben Cooper, Inc., 896 F.2d 1394 (2d Cir.), vacated, 498 U.S. 964 , 111 S.Ct. 425 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990), reinstated, 924 F.2d 36 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 2041 , 114 L.Ed.2d 126 (1991) with In re Grabill Corp., 976 F.2d 1126 (7th Cir.1992) and In re United Missouri Bank, N.A., 901 F.2d 1449 (8th Cir.1990) and In re Kaiser Steel Corp., 911 F.2d 380 (10th Cir.1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Billing v. Ravin Greenberg & Zackin, P.A. (In Re Billing)
See Metro Transportation Co. v. North Star Reinsurance Co., 912 F.2d 672 , 675 n. 1 (3d Cir.1990); see also In re Ben Cooper, Inc., 896 F.2d 1394 (2d Cir.), cert. granted, 497 U.S. 1023 , 110 S.Ct. 3269 , 111 L.Ed.2d 779 vacated and remanded, 498 U.S. 964 , 111 S.Ct. 425 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990), reinstated, 924 F.2d 36 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 2041 , 114 L.Ed.2d 126 *565 (1991); In re Grabill Corp., 967 F.2d 1152 (7th Cir.1992); In re Baker & Getty Financial Services, Inc., 954 F.2d 1169 (6th Cir.1992); In re Kaiser Steel Corp., 911 F.2d 380 (10th Cir.1990); In re Unit…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Orion Pictures Corp. v. Showtime Networks, Inc. (In Re Orion Pictures Corp.)
See also In re Ben Cooper, 896 F.2d 1394 , 1401-02 (2d Cir.), vacated and remanded sub nom., Insurance Co. of Penn. v. Ben Cooper, Inc., 498 U.S. 964 , 111 S.Ct. 425 , 112 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990), judgment reinstated, 924 F.2d 36 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 2041 , 114 L.Ed.2d 126 (1991) (analyzing nature of remedy to determine right to jury trial).
Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania
v.
Ben Cooper, Inc.
v.
Ben Cooper, Inc.
No. 89-1784.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 13, 1990.
498 U.S. 964
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Eighth Circuit (1) · E.D. New York (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. [Certio-rari granted, 497 U. S. 1023.] The United States, whose motion to intervene filed in this Court on September 28, 1990, was granted, has raised a question concerning the Court of Appeals’ jurisdiction over this case and hence a question about our own jurisdiction. Motion of United States to Intervene and Brief for United States 9-17. Because the Court of Appeals should address the jurisdictional issue in the first instance, we vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand the case for consideration of the jurisdictional issue raised by the United States.