green
Positive treatment
7.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Harris
See State v. Mooney, 218 Conn. 85, 131 , 588 A.2d 145 (trial court’s balancing was not ‘‘abuse of discretion . . . especially in light of the limiting instruction given to the jury on this issue’’), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 919 , 112 S. Ct. 330 , 116 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Payne
(2×)
Although property law notions of abandonment are not dispositive in the fourth amendment context; see State v. Mooney, 218 Conn. 85, 107 , 588 A.2d 145 ("[w]hether property has been abandoned, in this sense, does not depend on where legal title rests, or whether one asserting a Fourth Amendment right has a legally enforceable possessory interest in the property" [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 919 , 112 S.Ct. 330 , 116 L.Ed.2d 270 (1991), citing Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128, 143 , 99 S.Ct. 421 , 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978); I disagree with the majority's suggestion tha…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Davis
See State v. Mooney, 218 Conn. 85, 98-99 , 588 A.2d 145 , cert. denied, 502 U.S. 919 , 112 S. Ct. 330 , 116 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Vargas v. Cruise Ship Catering & Service
See Matute v. Lloyd Bermuda Lines, Ltd., 931 F.2d 231 (3d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 919 , 112 S.Ct. 329 , 116 L.Ed.2d 270 (1991); Volyrakis v. M/V Isabelle, 668 F.2d 863 (5th Cir.1982); Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Lacks
See State v. Mooney, 218 Conn. 85, 120 , 588 A.2d 145 , cert. denied, 502 U.S. 919 , 112 S. Ct. 330 , 116 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Witherington Construction Corp. v. United States
See United States v. Grumman Aerospace Corp., 927 F.2d 575, 579 (Fed.Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 919 , 112 S.Ct. 330 , 116 L.Ed.2d 270 (1991); W.H.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Maia
See State v. Mooney, 218 Conn. 85, 94 , 588 A.2d 145 , cert. denied, 502 U.S. 919 , 112 S. Ct. 330 , 116 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Ahern
See State v. Mooney, 218 Conn. 85 , 588 A.2d 145 , cert. denied, 502 U.S. 919 , 112 S. Ct. 330 , 116 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Day
We disagree. 15 For purposes of our analysis, we will assume arguendo that the defendant’s request related only to a nonconstitutional, statutory speedy trial right; see generally State v. Mooney, 218 Conn. 85, 114-25 , 588 A.2d 145 (distinct constitutional and statutory speedy trial rights), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 919 , 112 S. Ct. 330 , 116 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Perkins v. Freedom of Information Commission
See State v. Mooney, 218 Conn. 85, 96 , 588 A.2d 145 , cert. denied, 502 U.S. 919 , 112 S. Ct. 330 , 116 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Massad v. City of New London
See State v. Mooney, 218 Conn. 85 , 588 A.2d 145 , cert, denied, 502 U.S. 919 , 112 S. Ct. 330 , 116 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Vickers
See, e.g., State v. Mooney, 218 Conn. 85 , 126–30, 588 A.2d 145 , cert. denied, 502 U.S. 919 , 112 S. Ct. 330 , 116 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Vickers
See, e.g., State v. Mooney, 218 Conn. 85 , 126–30, 588 A.2d 145 , cert. denied, 502 U.S. 919 , 112 S. Ct. 330 , 116 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Jacques
"Of course, one need not have an 'untrammeled power to admit and exclude' in order to claim the protection of the fourth amendment, so long as the place involved is one affording an expectation of privacy that society regards as reasonable." State v. Hill , supra, at 94 n.19, 675 A.2d 866 ; see also State v. Mooney , 218 Conn. 85 , 95-96, 588 A.2d 145 , cert. denied, 502 U.S. 919 , 112 S. Ct. 330 , 116 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Jacques
One of the main rights attaching to property is the right to exclude others . . . and one who owns or lawfully possesses or controls property will in all likelihood have a legitimate expectation of privacy by virtue of this right to exclude.’’ (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Hill, 237 Conn. 81 , 94 n.19, 675 A.2d 866 (1996); see also Rakas v. Illinois, supra, 439 U.S. 144 n.12. ‘‘Of course, one need not have an ‘untram- meled power to admit and exclude’ in order to claim the protection of the fourth amendment, so long as the place involved is one affo…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Houghtaling
The third Boyd factor addresses whether the defendant ‘‘maintained the location and the items within it in a private manner at the time of the search.’’ State v. Boyd, supra, 57 Conn. App. 185 ; see also State v. Mooney, 218 Conn. 85, 110 , 588 A.2d 145 (resolving question of whether defendant had reasonable expecta- tion of privacy in duffel bag and cardboard box at time of search), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 919 , 112 S. Ct. 330 , 116 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Collins
(2×)
This is significant because "[u]ncharged misconduct evidence has been held not unduly prejudicial when the evidentiary substantiation of the vicious conduct, with which the defendant was charged, far outweighed, in severity, the character of his prior misconduct." [21] (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Beavers, supra, 290 Conn. at 405 , 963 A.2d 956 ; see id. (finding significant "that the prior misconduct evidence admitted involved only the defendant's actual, claimed or threatened damage of property for personal gain, as compared to the charged crime in the present case, which con…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Sawyer
I also agree that our test for the identity evidence is the so-called “logo” or “signature” test; see, e.g., State v. Mooney, 218 Conn. 85, 131-32 , 588 A.2d 145 , cert. denied, 502 U.S. 919 , 112 S. Ct. 330 , 116 L.
Cumber
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 91-5764.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 1991.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.