green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Gulley v. DZURENDA
See Hodge v. Police Officers, 802 F.2d 58, 61 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 986 , 112 S.Ct. 596 , 116 L.Ed.2d 620 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Donny Jace Hennefer
See United States v. Tisdale, 921 F.2d 1095, 1098-99 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 986 , 112 S.Ct. 596 , 116 L.Ed.2d 619 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hennefer
See United States v. Tisdale, 921 F.2d 1095, 1098-99 (10th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 986 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca10 1995
See United States v. Pettit, 938 F.2d 175, 178 (10th Cir.1991) (citing United States v. Tisdale, 921 F.2d 1095, 1100 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 986 , 112 S.Ct. 596 , 116 L.Ed.2d 619 (1991)). 101 In the background to Sec. 3B1.2, the Commission stated "[t]his section provides a range of adjustments for a defendant who plays a part in committing the offense that makes him substantially less culpable than the average participant." U.S.S.G.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Williamson
See United States v. Pettit, 938 F.2d 175, 178 (10th Cir.1991) (citing United States v. Tisdale, 921 F.2d 1095, 1100 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 986 , 112 S.Ct. 596 , 116 L.Ed.2d 619 (1991)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jackson v. State
See Valle v. State, 581 So.2d 40 , 47 n. 9 (Fla.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 986 , 112 S.Ct. 597 , 116 L.Ed.2d 621 (1991) (not error to refuse to give merger instruction where trial court merged aggravating factors into one).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Sanders
Once [appellant] was in custody, he no longer posed a threat to the police.' United States v. Henry, 48 F.3d 1282, 1284 (D.C.Cir.1995) (finding articulable suspicion based on informant's warning that appellant would have weapons, that appellant's `boys' or 'counterparts' might be with him, and that, when arrested just outside his front door, appellant said `they got me'); see also United States v. Tisdale, 921 F.2d 1095, 1097 (10th Cir.1990) (`[T]he danger which justifies a protective sweep comes from the possible presence of other armed and dangerous persons in the vicinity.'), cert. denied, …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mark Allen Ford
Once [appellant] was in custody, he no longer posed a threat to the police.” United States v. Henry, 48 F.3d 1282, 1284 (D.C.Cir.1995) (finding articulable suspicion based on informant’s warning that appellant would have weapons, that appellant’s “boys” or “counterparts” might be with him, and that, when arrested just outside his front door, appellant said “they got me”); see also United States v. Tisdale, 921 F.2d 1095, 1097 (10th Cir.1990) (“[T]he danger which justifies a protective sweep comes from the possible presence of other armed and dangerous persons in the vicinit…
Cabrera
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 91-5698.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 2, 1991.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.