green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
8.0 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“points not asserted with sufficient precision to indicate distinctly the party’s thesis will normally be spumed on appeal”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“The defendant’s burden in plain error cases is, and should be, a formidable one.”
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jenkins v. United States
the defendant's burden in plain error cases is, and should be, a formidable one.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Nixon v. United States
points not asserted with sufficient precision to indicate distinctly the party's thesis will normally be spumed on appeal
discussed
Cited "see"
Road Dawgs Motorcycle Club of the United States, Inc. v. \CUSE\" Road Dawgs
See George Basch Co. v. Blue Coral, Inc., 968 F.2d 1532, 1537 (2d Cir.1992) (“[U]nder § 35(a) of the Lanham Act, a plaintiff must prove that an infringer acted with willful deception before the infringer’s profits are recoverable by way of an accounting.”), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 991 , 113 S.Ct. 510 , 121 L.Ed.2d 445 (1992); cf. Kiki Undies Corp. v. Promenade Hosiery Mills, Inc., 308 F.Supp. 489, 494 (S.D.N.Y.1969) (plaintiff was entitled to an accounting for defendant’s profits, where defendant persisted in use of the ‘Kiki’ mark, “after being notified by the Patent Office” o…
cited
Cited "see"
Fruit-Ices Corp. v. CoolBrands International Inc.
See George Basch Co., v. Blue Coral, Inc., 968 F.2d 1532, 1536 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 991 , 113 S.Ct. 510 , 121 L.Ed.2d 445 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Brown v. United States
See Hunter v. United States, 606 A.2d 139, 144 (D.C.), cert, denied, 506 U.S. 991 , 113 S.Ct. 509 , 121 L.Ed.2d 444 (1992); Williamson v. United States, 445 A.2d 975 , 980 n. 5 (D.C.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Parker v. United States
Consequently, “the question presented is whether the judge abused his discretion by failing to intervene sua sponte in the prosecutor’s argument.” Mills v. United States, 599 A.2d 775, 787 (D.C.1991); accord, e.g., Hunter v. United States, 606 A.2d 139, 145 (D.C.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 991 , 113 S.Ct. 509 , 121 L.Ed.2d 444 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Clyburn v. District of Columbia
See (Kevin) Hunter v. United States, 606 A.2d 139, 144 (D.C.) (cert. denied, 506 U.S. 991 , 113 S.Ct. 509 , 121 L.Ed.2d 444 (1992)).
cited
Cited "see"
Nixon v. United States
See Hunter v. United States, 606 A.2d 139, 144 (D.C.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 991 , 113 S.Ct. 509 , 121 L.Ed.2d 444 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Porous Media Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Pall Corporation, Appellee/cross-Appellant
See George Basch Co. v. Blue Coral, Inc., 968 F.2d 1532, 1537-40 (2nd Cir.) (willful or intentional misconduct justifies award of profits under theories of unjust enrichment or deterrence), ce rt. denied, 506 U.S. 991 , 113 S.Ct. 510 , 121 L.Ed.2d 445 (1992); Burger King Corp. v. Mason, 855 F.2d 779, 781 (11th Cir.1988). 11 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Porous Media Corp. v. Pall Corporation
See George Basch Co. v. Blue Coral, Inc., 968 F.2d 1532 , 1537-40 (2nd Cir.) (willful or intentional misconduct justifies award of profits under theories of unjust enrichment or deterrence), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 991 (1992); Burger King Corp. v. Mason, 855 F.2d 779, 781 (11th Cir. 1988). -18- its assessment of Porous’s goodwill damages as “speculative,” Pall argues that the $1.6 million verdict “must be set aside in its entirety.” We are not convinced.
cited
Cited "see"
ca2 1996
See George Basch Co. v. Blue Coral, Inc., 968 F.2d 1532, 1543 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 991 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Step Co. v. Consumer Direct, Inc.
See George Basch Co. v. Blue Coral, Inc., 968 F.2d 1532, 1535 (2d Cir.1992 cert. denied, 506 U.S. 991 , 113 S.Ct. 510 , 121 L.Ed.2d 445 (1992); Chevron Chemical Co. v. Voluntary Purchasing Groups, Inc., 659 F.2d 695, 701 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1126 , 102 S.Ct. 2947 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1342 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arthur v. United States
See, e.g., Comford v. United States, 947 A.2d 1181, 1186 (D.C.2008) (noting that a purpose of requiring contemporaneous objection is to permit the trial judge to "correct the situation without jettisoning the trial'') (quoting Hunter v. United States, 606 A.2d 139, 144 (D.C.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 991 , 113 S.Ct. 509 , 121 L.Ed.2d 444 (1992)). 12 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Banks v. Horn
See, e.g., Williams v. Dixon, 961 F.2d 448 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 991 , 113 S.Ct. 510 , 121 L.Ed.2d 445 (1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Banks v. Horn
See, e.g., Williams v. Dixon, 961 F.2d 448 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 991 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert Glen Coe, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Ricky Bell, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-Appellee
Compare Miller v. Lockhart, 65 F.3d 676, 685-86 (8th Cir.1995) (finding bar) and Cordova v. Collins, 953 F.2d 167, 173 (5th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1067 , 112 S.Ct. 959 , 117 L.Ed.2d 125 (1992), with Williams v. Dixon, 961 F.2d 448, 456 (4th Cir.) (holding that exception to Teague applies), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 991 , 113 S.Ct. 510 , 121 L.Ed.2d 445 (1992) and DeShields v. Snyder, 829 F.Supp. 676, 687-88 (D.Del.1993) (holding that Mills is not a "new rule").
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rolex Watch Usa, Inc. v. Robert Meece, Doing Business as American Wholesale Jewelry
(2×)
See also George Basch Co., Inc. v. Blue Coral, Inc., 968 F.2d 1532, 1540 (2d Cir.) (to recover profits under § 1117(a), the “plaintiff must prove that an infringer acted with willful deception”), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 991 , 113 S.Ct. 510 , 121 L.Ed.2d 445 (1992); International Star Class Yacht Racing Ass’n v. Tommy Hilfiger, U.S.A., Inc., 80 F.3d 749, 753 (2d Cir.1996) (“In order to recover an accounting of an infringer’s profits, a plaintiff must prove that the infringer acted in bad faith”); Lindy Pen Co., Inc. v. Bic Pen Corp., 982 F.2d 1400, 1405 (9th Cir.) (‘Willful infrin…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Scott v. Anderson
Compare Williams v. Dixon, 961 F.2d 448, 459 (4th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 991 , 113 S.Ct. 510 , 121 L.Ed.2d 445 (1992) (holding that Mills survives the Teague bar) with Miller v. Lockhart, 65 F.3d 676, 685-86 (8th Cir. 1995) (holding that a Mills challenge is subject to the Teague bar) and Nethery v. Collins, 993 F.2d 1154, 1162 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1026 , 114 S.Ct. 1416 , 128 L.Ed.2d 87 (1994) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Royal v. Netherland
Rather than second-guessing decisions which are the result of trial tactics or strategy, the reviewing court must “indulge a strong presumption that counsel’s conduct falls within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 ; see also, Williams v. Dixon, 961 F.2d 448, 451 (4th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 991 , 113 S.Ct. 510 , 121 L.Ed.2d 445 (1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Riggs Investment Management Corp. v. Columbia Partners, L.L.C.
See also George Basch Co., Inc. v. Blue Coral Inc., 968 F.2d 1532, 1540 (2d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 991 , 113 S.Ct. 510 , 121 L.Ed.2d 445 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
New York Racing Assn., Inc. v. Stroup News Agency Corp.
Co., 349 F.2d 389 , 396-97 (2d Cir.1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 942 , 86 S.Ct. 1195 , 16 L.Ed.2d 206 (1966); see also George Basch Co. v. Blue Coral, Inc., 968 F.2d 1532 (2d Cir.) (holding that under 15 U.S.C. § 1117 (a), “a plaintiff must prove that an infringer acted with will *301 ful deception before the infringer’s profits are recoverable by way of an accounting.”), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 991 , 113 S.Ct. 510 , 121 L.Ed.2d 445 (1992). 9.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Foote v. United States
Compare Miller v. Avirom, 127 U.S.App.D.C. 367, 369-70 , 384 F.2d 319, 321-22 (1967) ("points not asserted with sufficient precision to indicate distinctly the party’s thesis ... will normally be spumed on appeal") and Hunter v. United States, 606 A.2d 139, 144 (D.C.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 991 , 113 S.Ct. 509 , 121 L.Ed.2d 444 (1993) (same) with Yee v. City of Escondido, 503 U.S. 519, 534 , 112 S.Ct. 1522, 1532 , 118 L.Ed.2d 153 (1992) (differentiating between "claims” and “arguments,” and stating that although claims not presented in a lower court will not be considered, "partie…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Mello
See also Williams v. Dixon, 961 F.2d 448, 451 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 991 (1992); Keys v. Duckworth, 761 F.2d 390, 394 (7th Cir. 1985).
Abate
v.
Goldsmith, Warden
v.
Goldsmith, Warden
No. 92-6270.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 16, 1992.
Published
Citer courts: District of Columbia Court of … (2)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.