green
Positive treatment
5.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
O'Brien v. Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois
See Leaf v. Supreme Court of Wisconsin, 979 F.2d 589, 597 (7th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 941 , 113 S.Ct. 2417 , 124 L.Ed.2d 639 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Eddie Lee Fryer v. United States
See Fryer v. United States, 508 U.S. 941 , 113 S.Ct. 2418 , 124 L.Ed.2d 641 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Gutierrez v. State
See Fuller v. State, 829 S.W.2d 191, 205 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 941 , 113 S.Ct. 2418 , 124 L.Ed.2d 640 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
McArthur v. State
See Fuller v. State, 829 S.W.2d 191, 202 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 941 , 113 S.Ct. 2418 , 124 L.Ed.2d 640 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nancy Lynne Moyer
See United States v. Jones, 965 F.2d 1507, 1520 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 924 , 925, 118 S.Ct. 346 , 121 L.Ed.2d 261 (1992), 508 U.S. 941 , 113 S.Ct. 2418 , 124 L.Ed.2d 640 (1993) (where term is not defined by statute, it should be given its ordinary meaning).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nancy Lynne Moyer
See United States v. Jones, 965 F.2d 1507, 1520 (8th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 924 , 965 (1992), 508 U.S. 941 (1993) (where term is not defined by statute, it should be given its ordinary meaning).
cited
Cited "see"
Ortiz v. State
See Fuller v. State, 829 S.W.2d 191, 200 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 941 , 113 S.Ct. 2418 , 124 L.Ed.2d 640 (1993); Smith v. State, 513 S.W.2d 823, 826 (Tex.Crim.App.1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Jones v. State
See Fuller v. State, 829 S.W.2d 191, 206 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 941 , 113 S.Ct. 2418 , 124 L.Ed.2d 640 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Myers
See United States v. Hicks, 980 F.2d 963, 974 (5th Cir.) (citing United States v. Lewis, 780 F.2d 1140, 1143 (4th Cir.1986)), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 941 , 113 S.Ct. 2417 , 124 L.Ed.2d 640 (1993). 4 Because § 875(c) contains-nothing suggesting a specific intent requirement, it defines only a general intent offense.
discussed
Cited "see"
Edwards v. Manchester Airport
See Leaf v. Supreme Court of State of Wis., 979 F.2d 589, 600-01 (7th Cir. 1992), cert, denied, 508 U.S. 941 (1993); see also In re Alfred P ., 126 N.H. 628, 629 (1985) ("The doctrine of res judicata precludes the litigation in a later case of matters actually litigated, and matters that could have been litigated, in an earlier action between the same parties for the same cause of action.") There is no doubt that plaintiff's cause of action in state court was the same as it is here, as the same factual circumstances formed the basis for both actions.5 See ERG, Inc. v. Barnes, 137 N.H. 186, 191…
discussed
Cited "see"
McFarland v. State
(2×)
See Fuller v. State, 829 S.W.2d 191, 209 (Tex.Cr.App.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 941 , 113 S.Ct. 2418 , 124 L.Ed.2d 640 (1993) (jury nullification charge); State v. McPherson, 851 S.W.2d 846, 847-50 (Tex.Cr.App.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 939 , 113 S.Ct. 2414 , 124 L.Ed.2d 637 (1993) (fourth special issue).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chavez v. State
(2×)
Compare Fuller v. State, 829 S.W.2d 191, 201-02 (Tex.Cr.App.1992) and at 211 (Miller, J., concurring), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 941 , 113 S.Ct. 2418 , 124 L.Ed.2d 640 (1993) (Article 38.23(a) did not require exclusion of the evidence), with, Fuller, 829 S.W.2d at 210-11 (Clinton, J., dissenting) ("plain" language of Article 38.23(a) required exclusion of the evidence).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John Duda v. Board of Education of Franklin Park Public School District No. 84, John Barry, Dan Pietrini
See also Leaf v. Supreme Court of State of Wis., 979 F.2d 589, 595 (7th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 941 , 113 S.Ct. 2417 , 124 L.Ed.2d 639 (1993); Fuhrer v. Fuhrer, 292 F.2d 140, 142 (7th Cir.1961) (citing Peterson Steels, Inc. v. Seidmon, 188 F.2d 193 (7th Cir.1951)). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mark Reed
See 49 F.3d at 900 ; see also United States v. Vargas, 986 F.2d 35, 41-42 (2d Cir.) (enhancement appropriate where defendant fled during controlled delivery .in which he was cooperating after his arrest and grabbed officer’s gun when apprehended), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 941 , 113 S.Ct. 2417 , 124 L.Ed.2d 640 (1993); United States v. Mondello, 927 F.2d 1463, 1466-67 (9th Cir.1991) (enhancement appropriate where defendant fled after he had been arrested for the offense, had been told he was a suspect in a criminal case, and “[f]or two weeks prior to his final arrest ... played a cat-and-mous…
Hayhow
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 92-5690.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 24, 1993.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.