Herrold v. United States, 510 U.S. 1100 (1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Herrold v. United States, 510 U.S. 1100 (1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “The presumption of regularity attaches to this situation, requiring this court to presume, in the absence of a contrary showing, that the trial court acted in accordance with its ruling[.]”
92 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Wallace v. State (alaskactapp, 1997-02-28)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Wallace v. State
Alaska Ct. App. · 1997 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the presumption of regularity attaches to this situation, requiring this court to presume, in the absence of a contrary showing, that the trial court acted in accordance with its ruling
cited Cited "see" United States v. Maldonado
E.D.N.Y · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Maldonado v. United States, 510 U.S. 1100 , 114 S.Ct. 942 , 127 L.Ed.2d 232 (1994).
discussed Cited "see" Young v. State
Okla. Crim. App. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pickens v. State, 1993 OK CR 15, ¶ 37 , 850 P.2d 328, 337 , cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1100 , 114 S.Ct. 942 , 127 L.Ed.2d 232 (1994); Hooker v. State, 1994 OK CR 75 , ¶ 42, 887 P.2d 1351, 1364 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 858 , 116 S.Ct. 164 , 133 L.Ed.2d 106 (1995); Paxton v. State, 1993 OK CR 59, ¶ 47 , 867 P.2d 1309, 1324-25 , cert. denied, 513 U.S. 886 , 115 S.Ct. 227 , 130 L.Ed.2d 153 (1994).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Mangone
1st Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Jones, 1 F.3d 1167, 1170 (11th Cir.1993) (lack of Burns notice subject to plain error review), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1100 , 114 S.Ct. 942 , 127 L.Ed.2d 231 (1994); United States v. Lowenstein, 1 F.3d 452, 454 (6th Cir.1993) (same).
discussed Cited "see" Sever v. Alaska Pulp Corp.
Alaska · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jerrel v. State, 851 P.2d 1365, 1370 (Alaska App.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1100 , 114 S.Ct. 942 , 127 L.Ed.2d 232 (1994). 8 Sever bases his argument primarily on a numerical analysis of the questioned jurors.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Wahpeton Canvas Co. v. Bremer
N.D. Iowa · 1997 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Miles Labs., Inc. v. Shandon, Inc., 997 F.2d 870, 879 (Fed.Cir.1993) (because the court of appeals affirmed the district court’s determination of invalidity, it did not reach the district court’s infringement determination), ce rt. denied, 510 U.S. 1100 , 114 S.Ct. 943 , 127 L.Ed.2d 232 (1994); Cedarapids, Inc. v. Nordberg, Inc., 895 F.Supp. 1230 (N.D.Iowa 1995) (citing Miles Labs., and considering validity or invalidity of a patent in suit on summary judgment before addressing infringement issues).
Herrold
v.
United States
93-7204.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 24, 1994.
510 U.S. 1100
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Alaska (1)

510 U.S. 1100

Herrold
v.
United States.

No. 93-7204.

Supreme Court of United States.

January 24, 1994.

1

Appeal from the C. A. 3d Cir.

2

Certiorari denied. Reported below: 8 F. 3d 814.