green
Positive treatment
5.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Woods View Ii, Llc, Apps./cross-res. v. Kitsap County, Res./cross-appellants
See Guimont v. Clarke, or physical 121 Wn.2d 586, 608 , 854 P. 2d 1 ( 1993), cert. denied, 510 U. S. 1176 ( 1994); Margola Assocs. v. City of Seattle, 121 Wn. 2d 625, 649 , 854 P. 2d 23 ( 1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Woods View II, LLC v. Kitsap County
See Guimont v. Clarke, 121 Wn.2d 586, 608 , 854 P.2d 1 (1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1176 (1994); Margola Assocs. v. City of Seattle, 121 Wn.2d 625, 649 , 854 P.2d 23 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Griffin v. Thurston County
See Guimont v. Clarke, 121 Wash.2d 586, 608-09 , 854 P.2d 1 (1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1176 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Griffin v. Thurston County Board of Health
See Guimont v. Clarke, 121 Wn.2d 586, 608-09 , 854 P.2d 1 (1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1176 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
EDMONDS SHOPPING CENTER ASS'N v. City of Edmonds
See Guimont v. Clarke, 121 Wash.2d 586, 602-04 , 854 P.2d 1 (1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1176 , 114 S.Ct. 1216 , 127 L.Ed.2d 563 (1994). [41] 505 U.S. 1003 , 112 S.Ct. 2886 , 120 L.Ed.2d 798 (1992). [42] 114 Wash.2d 320 , 787 P.2d 907 ; Guimont, 121 Wash.2d at 600 , 854 P.2d 1 . [43] Guimont, 121 Wash.2d at 602 , 854 P.2d 1 . [44] Guimont, 121 Wash.2d at 603 , 854 P.2d 1 . [45] Guimont, 121 Wash.2d at 604 , 854 P.2d 1 . [46] See Guimont, 121 Wash.2d at 594 , 854 P.2d 1 . [47] Guimont, 121 Wash.2d at 608 , 854 P.2d 1 . [48] Presbytery, 114 Wash.2d at 330 , 787 P.2d 907 . [49] Weden, 135 Wash.…
cited
Cited "see"
Edmonds Shopping Center Associates v. City of Edmonds
See Guimont v. Clarke, 121 Wn.2d 586, 602-04 , 854 P.2d 1 (1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1176 (1994). 505 U.S. 1003 , 112 S. Ct. 2886 , 120 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Rhoades v. City of Battle Ground
See Guimont v. Clarke, 121 Wash.2d 586, 594 , 854 P.2d 1 (1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1176 , 114 S.Ct. 1216 , 127 L.Ed.2d 563 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Rhoades v. City of Battle Ground
See Guimont v. Clarke, 121 Wn.2d 586, 594 , 854 P.2d 1 (1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1176 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Utley v. State
(2×)
See Tyson v. State, 619 N.E.2d 276, 300 (Ind.Ct.App.1993) (before a defendant is entitled to reversal, he must affirmatively show that there was error prejudicial to his substantial rights), trans. denied, cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1176 , 114 S.Ct. 1216 , 127 L.Ed.2d 562 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Schreiner Farms, Inc. v. Smitch
See Guimont v. Clarke, 121 Wn.2d 586, 604 , 854 P.2d 1 (1993) (refusing to analyze a takings claim under the state constitution because the party asserting that claim failed to brief the Gunwall factors), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1176 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jesse J. Evans
See United States v. Davis, 1 F.3d 606, 607 (7th Cir.1993), certiorari denied, 510 U.S. 1176 , 114 S.Ct. 1216 , 127 L.Ed.2d 563 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kardules v. City of Columbus
See, e.g., City of Detroit v. Franklin, 4 F.3d 1367, 1372-74 (6th Cir.1993) (considering standing under a theory of vote dilution, but finding no standing due to failure to establish the causation element), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1176 , 114 S.Ct. 1217 , 127 L.Ed.2d 563 (1994); Rosen v. Brown, 970 F.2d 169, 176 (6th Cir.1992) (affirming a grant of summary judgment for plaintiffs on their vote impairment claim, but not addressing plaintiffs’ standing); Michel v. Anderson, 14 F.3d 623, 626 (D.C.Cir.1994) (“The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that voters have standing to challenge practices …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kardules v. City Of Columbus
See, e.g., City of Detroit v. Franklin, 4 F.3d 1367, 1372-74 (6th Cir.1993) (considering standing under a theory of vote dilution, but finding no standing due to failure to establish the causation element), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1176 , 114 S.Ct. 1217 , 127 L.Ed.2d 563 (1994); Rosen v. Brown, 970 F.2d 169, 176 (6th Cir.1992) (affirming a grant of summary judgment for plaintiffs on their vote impairment claim, but not addressing plaintiffs' standing); Michel v. Anderson, 14 F.3d 623, 626 (D.C.Cir.1994) ("The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that voters have standing to challenge practices that…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty v. Michael Kantor
See, e.g., City of Detroit v. Franklin, 4 F.3d 1367, 1374 (6th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1176 , 114 S.Ct. 1217 , 127 L.Ed.2d 563 (1994); Tucker v. Department of Commerce, 958 F.2d at 1415-16 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 953 , 113 S.Ct. 407 , 121 L.Ed.2d 332 (1992); Carey v. Klutznick, 637 F.2d 834, 838 (2d Cir.1980); City of New York v. Dept. of Commerce, 713 F.Supp. 48, 50-52 (E.D.N.Y.1989); City of Willacoo-chee v. Baldrige, 556 F.Supp. 551, 554 (S.D.Ga.1983); City of Camden v. Plotkin, 466 F.Supp. 44, 47-51 (D.N.J.1978).
Rogers
v.
Eu, Secretary of State of California
v.
Eu, Secretary of State of California
93-932.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 7, 1994.
510 U.S. 1176
Published
Rogers
v.
Eu, Secretary of State of California.
No. 93-932.
Supreme Court of United States.
March 7, 1994.
1
Appeal from the Ct. App. Cal., 3d App. Dist.
2
Certiorari denied.