Pinter v. United States, 510 U.S. 900 (1993). · Go Syfert
Pinter v. United States, 510 U.S. 900 (1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
61 citation events (34 in the last 25 years) across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hart v. Myers (ctd, 2002-01-23)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Hart v. Myers (2×)
D. Conn. · 2002 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
the open fields doctrine does not require that law enforcement officials have some objective reason - - either probable cause or reasonable suspicion- before entering an open field.
discussed Cited "see" Schroeder v. Kochanowski (2×)
D. Kan. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See U.S. v. Pinter, 984 F.2d 376, 379 (10th Cir.), cert. denied 510 U.S. 900 , 114 S.Ct. 273 , 126 L.Ed.2d 224 (1993). 43 . 520 U.S. 781, 785 , 117 S.Ct. 1734 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1 (1997).
cited Cited "see" In re Wallace
Bankr. E.D. Mo. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Huebner v. Farmers State Bank, Grafton, Iowa, 986 F.2d 1222 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 900 , 114 S.Ct. 272 , 126 L.Ed.2d 223 (1993).
cited Cited "see" Nadine Eilbert v. David Pelican
8th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Huebner, 986 F.2d 1222, 1224 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 900 (1993).
cited Cited "see" In Re: Nadine F. Eilbert, Debtor. Nadine F. Eilbert v. David Dennis Pelican Anita L. Shodeen
8th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Huebner, 986 F.2d 1222, 1224 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 900 , 114 S.Ct. 272 , 126 L.Ed.2d 223 (1993).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ladd v. Ries (In Re Ladd) (2×)
8th Cir. BAP · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, also Huebner v. Farmers State Bank, Grafton, Iowa ( In re Huebner), 986 F.2d 1222, 1224 (8th Cir.1993), cert denied, 510 U.S. 900 , 114 S.Ct. 272 , 126 L.Ed.2d 223 (1993) (No. 93-5597), holding that an order denying a claimed exemption was final for purposes of appeal. [4] The limited avenues for post-judgment relief are set forth in Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59 and 60.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." James W. Ladd v. Charles W. Ries
8th Cir. BAP · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, also Huebner v. Farmers State Bank, Grafton, Iowa (In re Huebner), 986 F.2d 1222, 1224 (8th Cir. 1993), cert denied, 510 U.S. 900 , 114 S.Ct. 272 (U.S. Oct. 4, 1993)(No. 93-5597), holding that an order denying a claimed exemption was final for purposes of appeal. 4 akin to allowing a party to add a new claim to a complaint after trial and entry of a judgment.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Rudy Vargas
9th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
"To determine whether an identification procedure is impermissibly suggestive, we review the totality of the circumstances." United States v. Jones, 84 F.3d 1206, 1209 (1996); see also United States v. Carbajal, 956 F.2d 924, 929 (1992) (holding that photo line-up was not impermissibly suggestive where all six photos were of Hispanic males in the same age range, with similar skin, eye and hair coloring even though defendant was only one with discernible bruises and a wig), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 900 (1993). 9 Here, the photographs all depict male Hispanics with similar facial features, complex…
Pinter
v.
United States
93-5610.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1993.
510 U.S. 900

510 U.S. 900

Pinter
v.
United States.

No. 93-5610.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 4, 1993.

1

Appeal from the C. A. 10th Cir.

2

Certiorari denied. Reported below: 984 F. 2d 376.