Int'l Terminal Corp. v. M/T Loire, 513 U.S. 915 (1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Int'l Terminal Corp. v. M/T Loire, 513 U.S. 915 (1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“it is the insured's initial discharge, however, not the resulting damage or pollution, that is the focus of the inquiry under the pollution exclusion clauses.”
20 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Admiral Insurance Co. (delsuperct, 1995-08-23)
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Admiral Insurance Co.
Del. Super. Ct. · 1995 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
it is the insured's initial discharge, however, not the resulting damage or pollution, that is the focus of the inquiry under the pollution exclusion clauses.
discussed Cited "see" Grow Michigan, LLC v. LT Lender, LLC
E.D. Mich. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hamid v. Price Waterhouse, 51 F.3d 1411, 1420 (9th Cir. 1995) (quoting Manson v. Stacescu, 11 F.3d 1127, 1130 (2d Cir. 1993), cert. denied 513 U.S. 915 (1994)) (“‘The creditor generally sustains injury only because he has a claim against the corporation.
discussed Cited "see" Kaiser v. Stewart
E.D. Pa. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Manson v. Stacescu, 11 F.3d 1127, 1130-33 (2d Cir.1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 915 , 115 S.Ct. 292 , 130 L.Ed.2d 206 (1994); Mid-State Fertilizer Co. v. Exchange Nat’l Bank, 877 F.2d 1333, 1336-37 (7th Cir.1989).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bank of America Corp. v. Lemgruber
S.D.N.Y. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
Laborers Local 17 Health and Benefit Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc., 191 F.3d 229, 236, 242 (2d Cir.1999) (holding that derivatively-injured plaintiffs lacked standing to sue for fraud under New York law), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1080 , 120 S.Ct. 799 , 145 L.Ed.2d 673 (2000); see also Manson v. Stacescu, 11 F.3d 1127, 1130-31 (2d Cir.1993) (holding that plaintiff “does not have standing in his capacity as a creditor, shareholder, or employee of a corporation to assert a RICO claim for injuries that are derivative of those sustained by that corporation”), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 915 , 115 S.Ct. …
International Terminal Corp.
v.
M/T Loire
No. 93-1960.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1994.
513 U.S. 915
Consideration, Took.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 65%
Citer courts: Superior Court of Delaware (1)

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.