green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Ruthardt v. United States
See Williams v. Ashland Eng’g Co., 45 F.3d 588, 592 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 807 , 116 S.Ct. 51 , 133 L.Ed.2d 16 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pyle v. Hatley
“Out-of-state legal representation does not establish purposeful availment of the privilege of conducting activities in the forum state, where the law firm is solicited in its home state and takes no affirmative actions to promote business within the forum state.” Sher v. Johnson, 911 F.2d 1357, 1363 (9th Cir.1990); see also Trinity Indus., Inc. v. Myers & Assoc., Ltd., 41 F.3d 229, 230 (5th Cir.) (“The bare existence of an attorney-client relationship is not sufficient” to establish the requisite minimum contacts necessary for personal jurisdiction), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 807 , 116 S…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Cisneros
See also Williams v. Ashland Engineering Co., Inc., 45 F.3d 588, 592 (1st Cir.) cert. denied, 516 U.S. 807 , 116 S.Ct. 51 , 133 L.Ed.2d 16 (1995) (Statutory overruling of existing Court of Appeals decision is an exception to the principle of stare decisis.) Compare Ford v. Cimarron Insurance Company, Inc., 230 F.3d 828, 832 (5th Cir.2000) (“[A] prior panel’s interpretation of state law has binding precedential effect on other panels of this court absent a subsequent state court decision or amendment rendering our prior decision clearly wrong.”) For the reasons set out below, this Court i…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Leasetec Corp. v. Orient Systems, Inc.
(To avoid a waiver, defendants must assert all of their affirmative defenses in the answer); See also Williams v. Ashland Engineering Co., 45 F.3d 588, 593 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 807 , 116 S.Ct. 51 , 133 L.Ed.2d 16 (1995). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hawkins v. Leslie Pool Mart Inc
See, e.g., Williams v. Ashland Eng'g Co., 45 F.3d 588 , 592 n.7 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 807 (1995) (recognizing that federal preemption is affirmative defense as to which defendant has burden of proof). 5.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dawn-Marie Hawkins James E. Hawkins v. Leslie's Pool Mart, Inc
See, e.g., Williams v. Ashland Eng’g Co., 45 F.3d 588 , 592 n. 7 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 807 , 116 S.Ct. 51 , 133 L.Ed.2d 16 (1995) (recognizing that federal preemption is affirmative defense as to which defendant has burden of proof). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
National Commodity & Barter Assn.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 94-1825.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1995.
Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.