green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.1 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“[T]he trier of fact has the discretion to award damages within the range of the evidence presented at trial”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“the trier of fact has the discretion to award damages within the range of the evidence presented at trial”
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States Ex Rel. Garibaldi v. Orleans Parish School Board
the trier of fact has the discretion to award damages within the range of the evidence presented at trial
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
MMAR Group, Inc. v. Dow Jones & Co., Inc.
he trier of fact has the discretion to award damages within the range of the evidence presented at trial
cited
Cited "see"
Childers v. United States
See Sylla-Sawdon v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co., 47 F.3d 277, 284 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 822 , 116 S. Ct. 84 , 133 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Childers v. United States
See Sylla-Sawdon v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co., 47 F.3d 277, 284 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 822 , 116 S.Ct. 84 , 133 L.Ed.2d 42 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Nathan and Deborah Childers v. the United States 08-1981
See Sylla-Sawdon v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co., 47 F.3d 277, 284 (8th Cm.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 822 , 116 S.Ct. 84 , 133 L.Ed.2d 42 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
81 Spooner Road LLC v. Town of Brookline
See Perini Corp. v. Commissioner of Revenue, 419 Mass. 763, 767 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 822 (1995) (noting first step in analyzing State’s action under negative commerce clause [“power ... to regulate commerce”] is to determine whether law has only “incidental effects” on interstate commerce); Arthur D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Frank Stevenson v. Union Pacific RR
See Sylla-Sawdon v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co., 47 F.3d 277, 280 (8th Cir.) (noting that the tires destroyed were “critical to this litigation”), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 822 , 116 *751 S.Ct. 84, 133 L.Ed.2d 42 (1995); Dillon, 986 F.2d at 266 (noting that the “crucial evidence” destroyed was the car that caused the injuries that were the subject of the lawsuit).
discussed
Cited "see"
Frank Stevenson v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
See Sylla-Sawdon v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co., 47 F.3d 277, 280 (8th Cir.) (noting that the tires destroyed were "critical to this litigation"), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 822 , 116 S.Ct. 84 , 133 L.Ed.2d 42 (1995); Dillon, 986 F.2d at 266 (noting that the "crucial evidence" destroyed was the car that caused the injuries that were the subject of the lawsuit).
discussed
Cited "see"
Arctic Cat, Inc. v. Injection Research Specialists, Inc.
See, id., citing, Sylla-Sawdon v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co., 47 F.3d 277, 280 (8th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 822 , 116 S.Ct. 84 , 133 L.Ed.2d 42 (1995); Dillon v. Nissan Motor Co., Ltd., 986 F.2d 263, 267 (8th Cir.1993); SDI Operating Partnership, L.P. v. Neuwirth, 973 F.2d 652, 655 (8th Cir.1992); Scout v. City of Gordon, 849 F.Supp. 687, 690-91 (D.Neb.1994); Capellupo v. FMC Corp., 126 F.R.D. 545, 551 (D.Minn.1989); cf., Baker v. General Motors Corp., 86 F.3d 811 , 817 (8th Cir.1996), cert. granted, 520 U.S. 1142 , 117 S.Ct. 1310 , 137 L.Ed.2d 474 , 65 USLW 3647 (U.S., March 24, 199…
cited
Cited "see"
Kadlick v. Department of Mental Health
See Perini Corp. v. Commissioner of Revenue, 419 Mass. 763, 772 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 822 (1995); Draper v. Town Clerk of Greenfield, 384 Mass. 444, 452 (1981), cert, denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
Prokosch v. Catalina Lighting, Inc.
See, Id., citing, Sylla-Sawdon v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co., 47 F.3d 277, 280 (8th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 822 , 116 S.Ct. 84 , 133 L.Ed.2d 42 (1995); Dillon v. Nissan Motor Co., Ltd., 986 F.2d 263, 267 (8th Cir.1993); SDI Operating Partnership, L.P. v. Neuwirth, 973 F.2d 652, 655 (8th Cir.1992); Scout v. City of Gordon, 849 F.Supp. 687, 690-91 (D.Neb.1994); Capellupo v. FMC Corp., 126 F.R.D. 545, 551 (D.Minn.1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Transclean Corp. v. Bridgewood Services, Inc.
See, Sylla-Sawdon v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co., 47 F.3d 277, 284 (8th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 822 , 116 S.Ct. 84 , 133 L.Ed.2d 42 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Transclean Corp. v. Bridgewood Services, Inc.
See, Sylla-Sawdon v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co., 47 F.3d 277, 284 (8th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 822 , 116 S.Ct. 84 , 133 L.Ed.2d 42 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Salgado ex rel. Salgado v. General Motors Corp.
See Sylla-Sawdon v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co., 47 F.3d 277, 284 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 822 , 116 S.Ct. 84 , 133 L.Ed.2d 42 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Salgado v. General Motors Corporation
See Sylla-Sawdon v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co., 47 F.3d 277, 284 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 822 , 116 S.Ct. 84 , 133 L.Ed.2d 42 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Onwuka v. Federal Express Corp.
See, Id., citing, Sylla-Sawdon v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co., 47 F.3d 277 , 280 (8th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 822 , 116 S.Ct. 84 , 133 L.Ed.2d 42 (1995); Dillon v. Nissan Motor Co., Ltd., 986 F.2d 263, 267 (8th Cir.1993); SDI Operating Partnership, L.P. v. Neuwirth, 973 F.2d 652, 655 (8th Cir. 1992); Scout v. City of Gordon, 849 F.Supp. 687, 690-91 (D.Neb.1994); Capellupo v. FMC Corp., 126 F.R.D. 545, 551 (D.Minn.1989); cf„ Baker v. General Motors Corp., 86 F.3d 811 , 817 (8th Cir.1996), cert. granted,-U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 1310 , 137 L.Ed.2d 474 (U.S.Mo.1997). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Munoz v. John Doe Corporations
Motors Corp., 150 F.3d 735 , 742 n. 6 (7th Cir.1998); see also Sylla–Sawdon v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co., 47 F.3d 277, 284 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 822 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Aboud v. Schlichtemeier
See also City of Houston v. Harris County Outdoor Advertising Assn., 879 S.W.2d 322, 334-6 (Tex.App. — Houston [14th Dist.] 1994, writ denied), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 822 , 116 S.Ct. 85 , 133 L.Ed.2d 42 (1995); Parallax Corp., N.V. v. City of El Paso, 910 S.W.2d 86, 92 (Tex.App. — El Paso 1995, writ denied)(the jury finding will survive a factual sufficiency attack if it falls within a narrower “range” of the expert testimony).
Schreiber
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 94-2096.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1995.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. Louisiana (1) · S.D. Texas (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.