green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Pavek v. Simon
See United States v. Whiton, 48 F.3d 356, 358 (8th Cir. 1995) (“[D]issimilar treatment of dissimilarly situated persons does not violate equal protection.” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 886 (1995). requiring him to “implement a non-discriminatory [] system that gives similarly-situated major-party candidates an equal opportunity to be placed first on the ballot.” (Pls.’ Mot. for Prelim.
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Vines
See Commonwealth v. Swist , 38 Mass. App. Ct. 907 , 908-909, 644 N.E.2d 650 (1995), cert. denied, *727 516 U.S. 886 , 116 S.Ct. 226 , 133 L.Ed.2d 156 (1995) (appeal dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on review of interlocutory order).
Turner
v.
Merit Systems Protection Board
v.
Merit Systems Protection Board
No. 95-5267.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1995.
Published
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.