green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.7 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "but see"
State v. Love
But see Beets v. Scott, 65 F.3d 1258, 1265 (5th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1157 (1996). ¶ 26.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Cesare
as long as a sentence carries a mandatory special assessment, it is a separate punishment for double jeopardy purposes.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Acoustic Systems, Inc. v. Wenger Corp.
mitchell permits interlocutory appeals only where the defendant is a public official asserting a defense of qualified immunity.
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Stansbury, K.
Any Challenge to the exercise of this discretion ordinarily does not raise a substantial question.' " Commonwealth v. Pass, 914 A.2d 442, 446-447 (Pa, Super. 2006), quoting Commonygalth-½-MgrC5, 889 A.2d 608, 612-613 (Pa. super. 2005); see Commonwealth v. Graham, 661 A.2d 1367 (Pa., 1995), dgnigd, 517 U.S. 1157 (1996)('!the general rule in Pennsylvania is that in imposing a sentence the court has discretion to determine whether to make it concurrent with or consecutive to Other sentences then being imposed or other sentences 40 previously imposed").
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Kujawa
See United States v. Kimbrough, 69 F.3d 723, 729 (5th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1157 , 116 S.Ct. 1547 , 134 L.Ed.2d 650 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Beets v. Johnson
See Beets v. Scott, 65 F.3d 1258 (5th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1157 , 116 S.Ct. 1547 , 134 L.Ed.2d 650 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Simpson
See United States v. Kimbrough, 69 F.3d 723, 727 (5th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1157 (1996); United States v. Layne, 43 F.3d 127, 132-33 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1077 (1995); United States v. Koelling, 992 F.2d 817, 821-22 (8th Cir. 1993); United States v. Hurt, 808 F.2d 707, 708 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 816 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William Riley Simpson
(2×)
See United States v. Kimbrough, 69 F.3d 723, 727 (5th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1157 , 116 S.Ct. 1547 , 134 L.Ed.2d 650 (1996); United States v. Layne, 43 F.3d 127, 132-33 (5th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1077 , 115 S.Ct. 1722 , 131 L.Ed.2d 580 (1995); United States v. Koelling, 992 F.2d 817, 821-22 (8th Cir.1993); United States v. Hurt, 808 F.2d 707, 708 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 816 , 108 S.Ct. 69 , 98 L.Ed.2d 33 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca3 1998
See Bush v. Rauch, 38 F.3d 842, 849 (6th Cir.1994). 34 In the instant case, Ohio Edison complied with all of the procedural requirements of Rule 56(f), in particular by filing an affidavit stating that "the party cannot for reasons stated present by affidavit facts essential to justify the party's opposition." See Plott v. General Motors Corp., 71 F.3d 1190, 1196 (6th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1157 , 116 S.Ct. 1546 , 134 L.Ed.2d 649 (1996); J.A. at 533 (Supplemental Aff. of Carr).
cited
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Benton D. BURT, Defendant-Appellant
See United States v. Jackson, 72 F.3d 1370, 1378 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1157 , 116 S.Ct. 1546 , 134 L.Ed.2d 649 (1996); United States v. Davis, 36 F.3d 1424, 1432 (9th Cir.1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Vargas-De Leon
Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335, 349-50 , 100 S.Ct. 1708 , 64 L.Ed.2d 333 (1980) (emphasis added); see also Beets v. Scott, 65 F.3d 1258, 1265 (5th Cir.1995) (en banc), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1157 , 116 S.Ct. 1547 , 134 L.Ed.2d 650 (1996) (the Sullivan “test sets a lower *857 threshold for reversal of a criminal conviction than does Strickland” and applies only to Sixth Amendment claims involving multiple representation).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Drisco
See State v. Sheika, 337 N.J.Super. 228, 246 , 766 A. 2d 1151 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 169 N.J. 609 , 782 A. 2d 427 (2001) (where we did not apply the per se Bellucci rule to evaluate the conflict caused when trial counsel's daughter was an assistant prosecutor from the county office prosecuting defendant); State v. Pych, 213 N.J.Super. 446, 453 , 517 A. 2d 871 (App.Div.1986) (where we found no constitutional impairment where counsel represented defendant while counsel was under indictment); see also Beets v. Scott, 65 F. 3d 1258, 1265 (5th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1157 , 116 S.Ct.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pelster Ex Rel. Boyer v. Walker
See also Eades v. Clark Distributing Co., Inc., 70 F.3d 441, 442 (6th Cir.1995)(aetion was barred due to failure to serve summons and complaint within time required by applicable Kentucky statute of limitations even though the action could have continued if federal procedural rules were controlling), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1157 , 116 S.Ct. 1545 , 134 L.Ed.2d 649 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vernon Kills on Top v. State
Compare Beets v. Scott (5th Cir.1995), 65 F.3d 1258, 1265 , cert. denied 517 U.S. 1157 , 116 S.Ct. 1547 , 134 L.Ed.2d 650 (limiting Cuyler to cases of multiple representation), with United States v. Moree (2d Cir.2000), 220 F.3d 65, 69 (applying Cuyler standards to defendant's claim that conflict arose between himself and his counsel after defendant criticized his counsel's performance), and United States v. Del Muro (9th Cir.1996), 87 F.3d 1078, 1080 (applying Cuyler to conflict of interest claim not involving multiple representation).
Eades et ux.
v.
Clark Distributing Co., Inc.
v.
Clark Distributing Co., Inc.
No. 95-1399.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 22, 1996.
Published
Citer courts: Third Circuit (1) · Fifth Circuit (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.