green
Positive treatment
8.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Randall E. Banks v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
See West v. Commonwealth, Ky., 780 S.W.2d 600, 602 (1989), cert. denied, 518 U.S. 1027 , 116 S. Ct. 2569 , 135 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Epperson v. Commonwealth
See West v. Commonwealth, 780 S.W.2d 600 (Ky.1989), cert. denied, West v. Seabold, 518 U.S. 1027 , 116 S.Ct. 2569 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1086 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Bowling v. Commonwealth
See West v. Commonwealth, Ky., 780 S.W.2d 600, 602 (1989), cert. denied, 518 U.S. 1027 , 116 S.Ct. 2569 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1086 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. D'Amario
See United States v. Caron, 64 F.3d 713, 714-17 (1st Cir.1995), cert. denied, 518 U.S. 1027 , 116 S.Ct. 2569 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1085 (1996). 2.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gerald Carroll
(2×)
See United States v. Flores, 73 F.3d 826, 832 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 518 U.S. 1027 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gerald R. Carroll
See United States v. Flores, 73 F.3d 826, 832 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 518 U.S. 1027 , 116 S.Ct. 2568 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1084 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Larry Curtis Kerr
See United States v. Flores, 73 F.3d 826, 831 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 518 U.S. 1027 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Earl Gene Ramsey
See United States v. Capps, 77 F.3d 350, 352 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 518 U.S. 1027 , 116 S.Ct. 2568 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1084 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ramsey
See United States v. Capps , 77 F.3d 350, 352 (10th Cir.), cert. denied , 518 U.S. 1027 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rodney Robles
See United States v. Flores, 73 F.3d 826, 833 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 518 U.S. 1027 , 116 S.Ct. 2568 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1084 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ivan L. Due
See United States v. Flores, 73 F.3d 826, 835 (8th Cir.) (standard of review), cert. denied, 518 U.S. 1027 , 116 S.Ct. 2568 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1084 (1996); U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c) (1997) (adjustment is appropriate where defendant organized, supervised, led, or managed criminal activity that involved fewer than five participants and was not otherwise extensive). 5 We have reviewed the record in accordance with Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), for any nonfrivolous issues for appeal, and have found none.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Terry Swant, United States of America v. Daniel Edward Bouska
See United States v. Flores, 73 F.3d 826, 835 (8th Cir.) (standard of review), cert. denied, 518 U.S. 1027 , 116 S.Ct. 2568 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1084 (1996). 6 Swant fronted drugs to two other individuals; found and cultivated the conspiracy's California drug source; alone arranged to pick up and transport the drugs from California to Iowa, where others resold them; and also cut the drugs.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Racey v. United States
Because constitutionally deficient representation must result in prejudice, a petitioner is entitled to relief “only if performance below professional standards caused the defendant to lose what he otherwise would probably have won.” United States v. Morrow, 977 F.2d 222, 229 (6th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 975 (1993); see also West v. Seabold, 73 F.3d 81, 84 (6th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 518 U.S. 1027 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re State Ex Rel. AJ
See e.g., United States v. C.L.O., 77 F.3d 1075, 1077 (8th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 518 U.S. 1027 , 116 S.Ct. 2570 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1086 (1996) (noting that "[m]ore than a decade after the McKeiver decision," in Schall v. Martin, 467 U.S. 253, 263 , 104 S.Ct. 2403, 2409 , 81 L.Ed.2d 207 (1984), "the Supreme Court cited McKeiver approvingly. . . ."); Valdez v. State, 33 Ark.App. 94 , 801 S.W.2d 659, 661 (1991) (due process standard of fundamental fairness maintained by enactment of Arkansas Juvenile Code without affording a jury trial); see also State ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State ex rel. A.J.
See e.g., United States v. C.L.O., 77 F.3d 1075, 1077 (8th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 518 U.S. 1027 , 116 S.Ct. 2570 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1086 (1996) (noting that “[mjore than a decade after the McKeiver decision,” in Schall v. Martin, 467 U.S. 253, 263 , 104 S.Ct. 2403, 2409 , 81 L.Ed.2d 207 (1984), "the Supreme Court cited McKeiver approvingly Valdez v. State, 33 Ark.App. 94 , 801 S.W.2d 659, 661 (1991) (due process standard of fundamental fairness maintained by enactment of Arkansas Juvenile Code without affording a jury trial); see also State ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Osborne
“Counsel is constitutionally ineffective only if performance below professional standards caused the defendant to lose what he otherwise would probably have won.” United States v. Morrow, 977 F.2d 222, 229 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 975 , 113 S.Ct. 2969 , 125 L.Ed.2d 668 (1993); see also West v. Seabold, 73 F.3d 81, 84 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 518 U.S. 1027 , 116 S.Ct. 2569 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1086 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State ex rel. D.J.
See e.g., United States v. C.L.O., 77 F.3d 1077, 1077 (8th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 518 U.S. 1027 , 116 S.Ct. 2570 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1086 (1996) (noting that ‘[m]ore than a decade after the McKeiver decision,” in Schall v. Martin, 467 U.S. 253, 263 , 104 S.Ct. 2403, 2409 , 81 L.Ed.2d 207 (1984), “the Supreme Court cited McKeiver approvingly....”); Valdez v. State, 33 Ark.App. 94 , 801 S.W.2d 659, 661 (1991) (due process standard'of fundamental fairness maintained by enactment of Arkansas Juvenile Code without affording a jury trial); see also State ex rel: Juvenile Dep’t of Klamath Count…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State Ex Rel. Dj
See e.g., United States v. C.L.O., 77 F.3d 1075, 1077 (8th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 518 U.S. 1027 , 116 S.Ct. 2570 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1086 (1996) (noting that "[m]ore than a decade after the McKeiver decision," in Schall v. Martin, 467 U.S. 253, 263 , 104 S.Ct. 2403, 2409 , 81 L.Ed.2d 207 (1984), "the Supreme Court cited McKeiver approvingly...."); Valdez v. State, 33 Ark.App. 94 , 801 S.W.2d 659, 661 (1991) (due process standard of fundamental fairness maintained by enactment of Arkansas Juvenile Code without affording a jury trial); see also State ex rel.
Caron
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 95-9120.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 24, 1996.
Published
C. A. 1st Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.