Coffman v. United States, 519 U.S. 802 (1996). · Go Syfert
Coffman v. United States, 519 U.S. 802 (1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“where drug jargon is used over the phone, the government may engage in more extensive wiretapping and the interception of innocent calls may be a more reasonable activity.”
35 citation events (33 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Roy Herrera Romero (ca5, 2020-10-26)
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Roy Herrera Romero
5th Cir. · 2020 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
where drug jargon is used over the phone, the government may engage in more extensive wiretapping and the interception of innocent calls may be a more reasonable activity.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. James Cole
5th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Tolliver, 61 F.3d 1189, 1195 (5th Cir. 1995), vacated on other grounds, 519 U.S. 802 (1996), remanded to 116 F.3d 120 (5th Cir. 1997); see also United States v. Santos, 541 F.3d 63, 72 (2d Cir. 2008) (holding that enforcing discipline and chastising rivals can constitute purposeful behavior in furtherance of an ongoing drug-dealing conspiracy); United States 9 v. Jenkins, 419 F.3d 614, 620 (7th Cir. 2005) (“Different people play different roles in a drug conspiracy, be it supplier, lookout, courier, or enforcer.”); United States v. Soto–Benitez, 356 F.3d 1, 18 (1st C…
discussed Cited "see" United States v. James Cole
5th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Tolliver, 61 F.3d 1189, 1195 (5th Cir.1995), vacated on other grounds, 519 U.S. 802 , 117 S.Ct. 40 , 136 L.Ed.2d 4 (1996), remanded to 116 F.3d 120 (5th Cir.1997); see also United States v. Santos, 541 F.3d 63, 72 (2d Cir.2008) (holding that enforcing discipline and chastising rivals can constitute purposeful behavior in furtherance of an ongoing drug-dealing conspiracy); United States v. Jenkins, 419 F.3d 614, 620 (7th Cir.2005) (“Different people play different roles in a drug conspiracy, be it supplier, lookout, courier, or enforcer.”); United States v. Soto-Benique…
cited Cited "see" Hicks v. State
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dennis v. State, 345 Md. 649, 654 , *124 693 A.2d 1150 (1997) (Dennis II) (affirming Dennis I after remand pursuant to Maryland v. Dennis, 519 U.S. 802 , 117 S.Ct. 40 , 136 L.Ed.2d 4 (1996)).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Gerardo Castillo-Chavez
5th Cir. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
Importantly, however, the evidence need not link Castillo directly to the drugs themselves to be sufficient for a conspiracy conviction. “[Tjhere are many different roles that participants in a drug conspiracy may play, for example: supervisor and manager, distributor, collector, courier, gunman and enforcer, and firearms procurer and storer.” United States v. Cole, 423 Fed.Appx. 452, 459 (5th Cir.2011) (unpublished); see also United States v. Tolliver, 61 F.3d 1189, 1195 (5th Cir.1995), vacated on other grounds, Moore v. United States, 519 U.S. 802 , 117 S.Ct. 40 , 136 L.Ed.2d 4 (1996). 9…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Attorney Grievance Commission v. Mahone
Md. · 2013 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Harris v. State, 237 Md. 299, 303 , 206 A.2d 254, 256 (1965) (holding that ‘[a] failure to obey a reasonable and lawful request by a police officer fairly made to prevent a disturbance to the public peace constitutes disorderly conduct.’).” Dennis v. State, 342 Md. 196, 201 , 674 A.2d 928, 930 (1996), cert. granted, judgment vacated, 519 U.S. 802 , 117 S.Ct. 40 , 136 L.Ed.2d 4 (1996), judgment reinstated, 345 Md. 649 , 693 A.2d 1150 (1997).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Armando Sauseda
5th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see also · confidence low
See United States v. Espinoza-Seanez, 862 F.2d 526, 537 (5th Cir.1988) (stating that the existence of a conspiracy may be inferred from circumstantial evidence); see also United States v. Tolliver, 61 F.3d 1189, 1195 (5th Cir.1995), vacated on other grounds, 519 U.S. 802 , 117 S.Ct. 40 , 136 L.Ed.2d 4 (1996), remanded to 116 F.3d 120 (5th Cir.1997) (stating that participatory positions in a drug conspiracy include “gunman” and drug “storer”).
Coffman
v.
United States
No. 95-8936.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1996.
519 U.S. 802

C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Bailey v. United States, 516 U. S. 137 (1995).