green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.4 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Robert Barnett v. U.S. Air, Inc.
But see Stone v. City of Mount Vernon, 118 F.3d 92, 98 (2d Cir.1997) (holding that plaintiff must merely ‘“suggest the existence of a particular plausible accommodation,’ ” which the defendant must then show is unreasonable), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1112 , 118 S.Ct. 1044 , 140 L.Ed.2d 109 (1998).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Stacey Barker v. Joan Yukins, in Her Official Capacity as Warden of the Scott Correctional Facility
because petitioner filed his application for a writ of habeas corpus on july 26, 1996, after the effective date of aedpa, the revised 2254(d) governs our inquiry....
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Barker v. Yukins
because petitioner filed his application for a writ of habeas corpus on july 26, 1996, after the effective date of aedpa, the revised 2254(d) governs our inquiry....
discussed
Cited "see"
Henry Stursberg v. Morrison Sund PLLC
See Wisland v. Admiral Beverage Corp., 119 F.3d 733, 736 (8th Cir. 1997) (law of transferee court applies to § 1406(a) transfer), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1112 (1998); Ferens v. John Deere Co., 494 U.S. 516, 531 (1990) (law of transferor court applies to § 1404 transfer).
cited
Cited "see"
Brizzi v. Utica National Insurance Group
See Stone v. City of Mount Vernon, 118 F.3d 92 , 96–97 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1112 , 118 S.Ct. 1044 , 140 L.Ed.2d 109 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Leonard v. Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc. (In Re SRC Holding Corp.)
See In re Cochrane, 124 F.3d 978, 981 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1112 , 118 S.Ct. 1044 , 140 L.Ed.2d 109 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Brian F. Leonard v. Executive Risk Indemnity
See In re Cochrane, 124 F.3d 978, 981 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1112 , 118 S.Ct. 1044 , 140 L.Ed.2d 109 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Whitlow v. VISITING NURSE ASS'N OF WESTERN NY
The term ‘essential functions’ does not include the marginal functions of the position.” 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2 (n)(l); see Stone v. City of Mount Vernon, 118 F.3d 92, 97 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1112 , 118 S.Ct. 1044 , 140 L.Ed.2d 109 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
McMillan v. Dooley
See Jones v. Cooper Industries, Inc., 938 S.W.2d 118, 124 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1996, writ den’d), cert. den’d, 522 U.S. 1112, 118 S.Ct. 1044 , 140 L.Ed.2d 109 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Mulhern v. Eastman Kodak Co.
See Stone v. City of Mount Vernon, 118 F.3d 92, 96-97 (2d Cir.1997), ce rt. denied, 522 U.S. 1112 , 118 S.Ct. 1044 , 140 L.Ed.2d 109 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Estate of Rick Ex Rel. Rick v. Stevens
Corp., 922 F.Supp. 1334, 1355 (N.D.Iowa 1996), aff'd, 119 F.3d 688 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1029 , 118 S.Ct. 629 , 139 L.Ed.2d 609 (1997); accord Wisland v. Admiral Beverage Corp., 119 F.3d 733 , 735 & n. 2 (8th Cir.1997) (“Transfer is allowed under 28 U.S.C. § 1404 (a) for the convenience of the parties ahd witnesses, and the chance for unfair prejudice or forum shopping is minimized because the district court is required to consider the interests of all involved in deciding whether to allow a transfer” and “historical and statutory notes associated with this section indicate…
discussed
Cited "see"
Jackson v. Anderson
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See State v. DePew, 38 Ohio St.3d 275, 289-90 , 528 N.E.2d 542, 558 (1988) (finding no prejudicial error where the trial court read all the statutory mitigating factors to the jury but did not comment on the factors actually presented by the defendant). [ ] The Court further notes that the Supreme Court in Buchanan observed that “we have never ... held that the state must affirmatively structure in a particular way the manner in which juries consider mitigating evidence.” Id., 522 U.S. at 276 , 118 S.Ct. 757 .
cited
Cited "see"
Westport Petroleum, Inc. v. THE M/T OSHIMA SPIRIT
See Sogem-Afrimet, Inc. v. M/V IRAN SELAYANG, 951 F.Supp. 429, 437 (1996), aff'd, 122 F.3d 1057 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1112 , 118 S.Ct. 1043 , 140 L.Ed.2d 108 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Robert Glen Coe v. Ricky Bell, Warden
See Harpster v. Ohio, 128 F.3d 322, 326 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1112 , 118 S.Ct. 1044 , 140 L.Ed.2d 109 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Parker v. Columbia Pictures Industries
See Stone v. City of Mount Vernon, 118 F.3d 92, 96-97 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1112 , 118 S.Ct. 1044 , 140 L.Ed.2d 109 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stapleton v. Prince Carpentry, Inc.
The regulations promulgated by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission define essential functions as the “fundamental job duties” of the position, but not “the marginal functions of the position.” 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2 (n)(1); see also Stone v. City of Mount Vernon, 118 F.3d 92, 97 (2d Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1112 (1998) (applying 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2 (n)(1) to ADA claims).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Russo v. National Grid, USA.
The Court finds that there is a factual dispute as to this material question, making summary judgment unsuitable.11 The regulations promulgated by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission define essential functions as the “fundamental job duties” of the position, but not “the marginal functions of the position.” 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2 (n)(1); see also Stone v. City of Mount Vernon, 118 F.3d 92, 97 (2d Cir. 1997), cert denied, 522 U.S. 1112 (1998) (applying 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2 (n)(1) to ADA claims).
Wisland
v.
Admiral Beverage Corp.
v.
Admiral Beverage Corp.
No. 97-963.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 23, 1998.
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (2)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.