green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. LaHue
See United States v. Corrow, 119 F.3d 796, 804 (10th Cir.1997) (“Our analysis of the fairness issue infuses our disposition of the second vagueness concern, the potential for arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement.”), cer t. denied, 522 U.S. 1133 , 118 S.Ct. 1089 , 140 L.Ed.2d 146 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca10 2001
See United States v. Corrow, 119 F.3d 796, 804 (10th Cir. 1997) ("Our analysis of the fairness issue infuses our disposition of the second vagueness concern, the potential for arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement."), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1133 (1998). 66 Second, defendants' argument ignores the actual instructions given in this case.
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Gonzalez De Castilla
See U.S. v. Cusimano, 123 F.3d 83 , 89 & n. 6 (2d Cir.1997) (approving district court’s jury instruction that “[¡Information is nonpublic if it is not available to the public through such sources as press releases, [SEC] filings, trade publications, analysts’ reports, newspapers, magazines, rumors, word of mouth or other sources.”), cert. denied, Flanagan v. U.S., 522 U.S. 1133 , 118 S.Ct. 1090 , 140 L.Ed.2d 146 (1998); U.S. v. Mylett, 97 F.3d 663 , 666 (2d Cir.1996) (“To constitute non-public information under the act, information must be specific and more private than general rumo…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. LaHue
See United States v. Corrow, 119 F.3d 796, 804 (10th Cir. 1997) ("Our analysis of the fairness issue infuses our disposition of the second vagueness concern, the potential for arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement."), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1133 (1998). 62 Second, defendants' argument ignores the actual instructions given in this case.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Zak
See, e.g., United States v. Corrow, 119 F.3d 796, 805 (10th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1133 , 118 S.Ct. 1089 , 140 L.Ed.2d 146 (1998) (“[I]t is not necessary to prove that a defendant violated the Migratory Bird Treaty Act with specific intent or guilty knowledge.” (citation omitted)). 5 *214 Congress has also consistently referred to misdemeanor violations under the MBTA as strict liability offenses.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Sueing v. Attorney General of Arizona
See, e.g., United States v. Artero, 121 F.3d 1256, 1257-59 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1133 , 118 S.Ct. 1089 , 140 L.Ed.2d 145 (1998).
Pompey
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 97-7343.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 23, 1998.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.