green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Hargrave-Thomas v. Yukins
See Welch, 49 F.Supp.2d at 1000 & n. 2 (discussing Gomez v. Acevedo, 106 F.3d 192, 193-94 (7th Cir.), vacated on other grounds, 522 U.S. 801 , 118 S.Ct. 37 , 139 L.Ed.2d 6 (1997)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Jones v. Chrans
See Gomez v. Acevedo, 106 F.3d 192, 196 (7th Cir.1997) (citing People v. Coleman, 168 Ill.2d 509 , 214 Ill.Dec. 212 , 660 N.E.2d 919, 927 (1995), vacated on other grounds, 522 U.S. 801 , 118 S.Ct. 37 , 139 L.Ed.2d 6 (1998)).
cited
Cited "see"
Warner v. City of Boca Raton
See Mack v. O’Leary, 80 F.3d 1175, 1178 (7th Cir.1996), judgment vacated 522 U.S. 801 , 118 S.Ct. 36 , 139 L.Ed.2d 5 (1997), (collecting cases).
cited
Cited "see"
Piaskowski v. Casperson
See Gomez v. Acevedo, 106 F.3d 192, 200 (7th Cir.), vacated on other grounds, 522 U.S. 801 , 118 S.Ct. 37 , 139 L.Ed.2d 6 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Donovan v. Moore
See Lancaster v. Florida, 522 U.S. 801 , 118 S.Ct. 37 , 139 L.Ed.2d 5 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Apache Stronghold v. USA
Compare Bryant v. Gomez, 46 F.3d 948, 949 (9th Cir. 1995) (adopting those limitations) with Mack v. O’Leary, 80 F.3d 1175 , 1178–79 (7th Cir. 1996) (noting the circuit split and rejecting Bryant), vacated on other grounds, 522 U.S. 801 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Senate Joint Resolution of Legislative Apportionment 1176
See, e.g., Diaz v. Silver, 978 F.Supp. 96, 104 (E.D.N.Y.1997) (concluding that because of the lack of compactness and the fact that incumbents were protected in 87% of the new districts, “[d]espite its conspicuous absence from any direct discussion, incumbency appears to have been the unacknowledged third-most-significant factor used when redistricting”), aff' d, 522 U.S. 801 , 118 S.Ct. 36 , 139 L.Ed.2d 5 (1997), and aff'd sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wayne Ford v. John McGinnis Superintendent, Patrick McGann Deputy Superintendent of Administration, Gordon Lord, Assistant Deputy Superintendent
See id. at 716 , 101 S.Ct. 1425 (“[I]t is not within the judicial function and judicial competence to inquire whether the petitioner or [another adherent] more correctly perceived the commands of their common faith,” because “[c]ourts are not arbiters of scriptural interpretation.”); see also Mack v. O’Leary, 80 F.3d 1175, 1179-80 (7th Cir.1996), vacated by 522 U.S. 801 , 118 S.Ct. 36 , 139 L.Ed.2d 5 (1997) (remanding in light of City of Boerne).
Silver, Speaker of the House for the New York State Assembly
v.
Diaz Acosta v. Diaz and Lau v. Diaz
v.
Diaz Acosta v. Diaz and Lau v. Diaz
No. 96-1680; No. 96-1904; No. 96-2008.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1997.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Affirmed on appeals from D. C. E. D. N. Y. Reported below: 978 F. Supp. 96.