green
Positive treatment
7.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Valjeanne Currie v. Group Insurance Commission
(2×)
See Ford v. Schering-Plough Corp., 145 F.3d 601, 612 (3rd Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1093 , 119 S.Ct. 850 , 142 L.Ed.2d 704 (1999) (court declines plaintiffs invitation to become a “super-actuary,” stating that it “is clearly not equipped to become the watchdog of the insurance business”).
discussed
Cited "see"
James Johnson v. K Mart Corporation
(2×)
See Ford v. Schering-Plough Corp., 145 F.3d 601 (3rd Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1093 , 119 S. Ct. 850 (1999); Castellano v. City of New York, 142 F.3d 58 (2d Cir. 1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bennett v. Appaloosa Horse Club
See Lipcon v. Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, 148 F.3d 1285 , 1290-91 (11th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1093 , 119 S.Ct. 851 , 142 L.Ed.2d 704 (1999); Afram Carriers, Inc. v. Moeykens, 145 F.3d 298, 301 (5th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1141 , 119 S.Ct. 1031 , 143 L.Ed.2d 40 (1999); Shell v. R.W.
cited
Cited "see"
James Johnson v. K-Mart Corporation
See Ford v. Schering-Plough Corp., 145 F.3d 601 (3rd Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1093 , 119 S. Ct. 850 (1999); Castellano v. City of New 75 York, 142 F.3d 58 (2d Cir. 1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carrano v. Harborside Healthcare Corp.
See Lipcon v. Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, 148 F.3d 1285 (11th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1093 , 119 S.Ct. 851 , 142 L.Ed.2d 704 (1999) ("Each party hereto irrevocably agrees that the courts of England shall have exclusive jurisdiction to settle any dispute.”); Argueta v. Banco Mexicano, S.A., 87 F.3d 320 (9th Cir.1996) ("the parties expressly submit themselves to the Federal Tribunals or the State Courts of Guadalajara, Jalisco, or Guaymas, Sonora” ); Leonard v. Garantia Banking Ltd., 1999 WL 944802 , at *6 (S.D.N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see"
Cambridge Biotech Corp. v. Pasteur Sanofi Diagnostics
See Lipcon v. Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, 148 F.3d 1285 , 1297 (11th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1093 (1999); Riley v. Kingsley Underwriting Agencies, Ltd., 969 F.2d 953, 958 (10th Cir.), cert, denied, 506 U.S. 1021 (1992) (“The fact that an international transaction may be subject to laws and remedies different or less favorable than those of the United States is not a valid basis to deny enforcement [of a forum selection clause], provided that the law of the chosen forum is not inherently unfair”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eller Media Co. v. City of Tucson
See Ruiz v. Hull, 191 Ariz. 441 , 957 P.2d 984 (1998) (laws directed at speech and communication subject to heightened scrutiny), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1093 , 119 S.Ct. 850 , 142 L.Ed.2d 703 (1999); see also Asselin v. Town of Conway, 137 N.H. 368 , 628 A.2d 247 (1993) (municipality’s ordinance restricting internally lighted signs, but otherwise allowing business owners to erect signs that could be effectively illuminated, did not impair owners’ freedom of expression).
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America v. Grant Armin Berry
See United States v. Bartolotta, 153 F.3d 875, 879 (8th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1093 , 119 S.Ct. 850 , 142 L.Ed.2d 703 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
United International Holdings, Inc. v. Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.
See Lipcon v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, 148 F.3d 1285 , 1289-90 (11th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1093 , 119 S.Ct. 851 , 142 L.Ed.2d 704 (1999); New Moon Shipping Co., Ltd. v. MAN B & W Diesel AG, 121 F.3d 24, 28 (2d Cir.1997); Riley v. Kingsley Underwriting Agencies, Ltd., 969 F.2d 953 , 956 *1223 (10th Cir.1992).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Bonnewell
See Ruiz v. Hull, 191 Ariz. 441, 448, ¶25 , 957 P.2d 984, 991, ¶ 25 (1998), cert. denied sub nom., Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona, 525 U.S. 1093 , 119 S.Ct. 850 , 142 L.Ed.2d 703 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Haynes v. Rhone-Poulenc, Inc.
See Ford v. Schering-Plough Corp., 145 F.3d 601, 604-05 (3d Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1093 , 119 S.Ct. 850 , 142 L.Ed.2d 704 (1999); Castellano v. The City of New York, 142 F.3d 58, 67 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 276 , 142 L.Ed.2d 228 ; see also Lewis v. Aetna Life Ins.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harry Casper, Inc. v. Pines Associates, L.P.
Finally, plaintiffs claim that it is not bound by the clause because it was not a signatory to the option agreement is not persuasive, considering that Pines was a signatory and would be bound by the clause and plaintiffs rights and interests in this litigation are derivative of the rights and interests of Pines (see Partnership Law §§ 115-a, 121-1002; see also Lipcon v Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, 148 F3d 1285 , 1299 [11th Cir 1998], cert denied 525 US 1093 [1999]; Great N. Ins.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kennerly v. Montgomery County Board of Commissioners
See, e.g., Davis v. Brady, 143 F.3d 1021 (6th Cir.1998) (holding that where officers release an inebriated individual from custody on a dark, busy highway, against his will, and the individual is subsequently struck by a car, a § 1983 claim can be pursued against the state on a state-created-danger theory of liability), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1093 , 119 S.Ct. 851 , 142 L.Ed.2d 704 (1999); Stemler v. City of Florence, 126 F.3d 856 (6th Cir.1997) (holding that where officers order an individual, under threat of arrest, into the car of her obviously inebriated boyfriend, and shortly thereafter s…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Frenklyn Piggie
(2×)
We have previously held, as is the case here, that “two or more sentences imposed at the same time ‘are not related for purposes of § 4A1.2(a)(2) if the cases proceeded to sentencing under separate docket numbers, and there was no formal order of consolidation.’ ” United States v. Klein, 13 F.3d 1182, 1185 (8th Cir.1994) (quoting United States v. McComber, 996 F.2d 946, 947 (8th Cir.1993)), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1226 , 114 S.Ct. 2722 , 129 L.Ed.2d 846 (1994); see also United States v. Bartolotta, 153 F.3d 875, 879 (8th Cir.1998) (holding that defendant’s prior “crimes were not co…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Frenklyn Piggie
We have previously held, as is the case here, that "two or more sentences imposed at the same time 'are not related for purposes of § 4A1.2(a)(2) if the cases proceeded to sentencing under separate docket numbers, and there was no formal order of consolidation.'" United States v. Klein, 13 F.3d 1182, 1185 (8th Cir.) (quoting United States v. McComber, 996 F.2d 946, 947 (8th Cir. 1993)), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1226 (1994); see also United States v. Bartolotta, 153 F.3d 875, 879 (8th Cir. 1998) (holding that defendant's prior "crimes were not consolidated because no formal order of consolidatio…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Allianz Ins. Co. of Canada v. Cho Yang Shipping Co., Ltd.
See Coastal Steel Corp. v. Tilghman Wheelabrator Ltd., 709 F.2d 190, 202-03 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, Coastal Steel Corp. v. Wheelabrator-Frye, Inc., 464 U.S. 938 , 104 S.Ct. 349 , 78 L.Ed.2d 315 (1983); see also Lipcon v. Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, 148 F.3d 1285 , 1299 (11th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1093 , 119 S.Ct. 851 , 142 L.Ed.2d 704 (1999); Manetti-Farrow, 858 F.2d at 514, n. 5; Crescent Corp. v. Proctor & Gamble Corp., 627 F.Supp. 745, 748 (N.D.Ill.1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Badia v. City of Casa Grande
See, e.g., Davis v. Brady, 143 F.3d 1021 (6th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1093 , 119 S.Ct. 851 , 142 L.Ed.2d 704 (1999); Kneipp v. Tedder, 95 F.3d 1199 (3d Cir.1996). 6 .
Bartolotta
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 98-7219.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 11, 1999.
525 U.S. 1093
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.