Smith v. United States, 528 U.S. 980 (1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Smith v. United States, 528 U.S. 980 (1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
14 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Weaver v. Shadoan (ca6, 2003-08-13)
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Weaver v. Shadoan (2×) also: Cited "see"
6th Cir. · 2003 · confidence medium
No. 01-5656 181 F.3d 774, 778 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 980 2.
cited Cited "see" Weaver v. Shadoan
6th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Walker, 181 F.3d 774, 778 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 980 , 120 S.Ct. 435 , 145 L.Ed.2d 340 (1999).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Winestock
4th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Winestock, 187 F.3d 633 (4th Cir.) (per curiam) (unpublished table decision), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 980 (1999).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Paul Winestock, Jr.
4th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Winestock, 187 F.3d 633 (4th Cir.) (per curiam) (unpublished table decision), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 980 , 120 S.Ct. 435 , 145 L.Ed.2d 340 (1999).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Richards
6th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hurst, 228 F.3d 751, 756 (6th Cir.2000) (citing United States v. Navarro-Camacho, 186 F.3d 701, 705 (6th Cir.1999) and United States v. Walker, 181 F.3d 774, 776 (6th Cir.1999), cert denied, 528 U.S. 980 , 120 S.Ct. 435 , 145 L.Ed.2d 340 (1999)).
discussed Cited "see" Marshall v. United States
1st Cir. · 2001 · signal: accord · confidence high
We have explained that pretrial notice of the possibility of enhanced sentencing for recidivism is not necessary, but that due process does require “reasonable notice of and an opportunity to be heard concerning the prior convictions.” United States v. Craveiro, 907 F.2d 260, 264 (1st Cir.1990); accord, e.g., United States v. O’Neal, 180 F.3d 115, 125-26 (4th Cir.) (“a defendant does have a right to adequate notice of ... the convictions that may support [an ACCA] enhancement”), cer t. denied, 528 U.S. 980 , 120 S.Ct. 433 , 145 L.Ed.2d 339 (1999); United States v. Tracy, 36 F.3d 187,…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Petersen
D. Colo. · 2003 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. O'Neal, 180 F.3d 115 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 980 , 120 S.Ct. 433 , 145 L.Ed.2d 339 (1999); United States v. Huss, 7 F.3d 1444 (9th Cir.1993); Roehl v. United States, 977 F.2d 375 (7th Cir.1992). 6 .
Smith
v.
United States
No. 99-6366.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 1, 1999.
528 U.S. 980
Published

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.