green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
14.2 score
“norwood ii”
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
New England Power Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(4×)
norwood ii
discussed
Cited "see"
Building And Construction Trades Council Of Buffalo, New York And Vicinity v. Downtown Development, Inc.
See id. at 56-57 . 3 Cf. UAW, 477 U.S. at 296-97 , 106 S.Ct. 2523 (Powell, J., dissenting) (arguing that the Court should reject "formalistic" germaneness, and inquire, inter alia, whether "[t]he number of members in the organization with a concrete stake in the outcome, ... may be so small that th[e] theoretical identity [of interest between organization and membership] disappears," and whether "a union may have reasons for instituting a suit — such as the publicity that attends a major case — other than to assert rights of its members"). 4 The First Circuit, in Town of Norwood, Mass. v. …
discussed
Cited "see"
Ganiko v. Ganiko
See Execu-Tech Business Systems, Inc. v. New Oji Paper Co. Ltd., 752 So.2d 582, 584 (Fla.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 818 , 121 S.Ct. 58 , 148 L.Ed.2d 25 (2000); Jet Charter Service, Inc. v. Koeck, 907 F.2d 1110, 1112 (11th Cir.1990) (applying Florida test for personal jurisdiction).
cited
Cited "see"
Sunday v. Martiki Coal Co.
See Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Co. v. Milliken, 200 F.3d 942, 946 (6th Cir.1999), ce rt. denied, 531 U.S. 818 , 121 S.Ct. 58 , 148 L.Ed.2d 25 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Berger v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JER.
See Dezaio v. Port Auth. of N. Y. and NJ, 205 F.3d 62, 65 (2d Cir.) (180-day limitation period ap *507 plies to claims brought by an employee of the Port Authority under the ADEA), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 818 , 121 S.Ct. 56 , 148 L.Ed.2d 24 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Royal Foods Co. v. RJR Holdings Inc.
See In re Magic Rests., Inc., 205 F.3d 108, 114-15 (3d Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 818 , 121 S.Ct. 56 , 148 L.Ed.2d 24 (Oct. 2, 2000) (quoting Estate of Cowart v. Nicklos Drilling Co., 505 U.S. 469, 476 , 112 S.Ct. 2589 , 120 L.Ed.2d 379 (1992)).
Magic Restaurants, Inc.
v.
Bowie Produce Co., Inc.
v.
Bowie Produce Co., Inc.
No. 99-1909.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 2000.
531 U.S. 818
Published
Citer courts: First Circuit (4)
C. A. 8d Cir. Certiorari denied.