green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
11.2 score
“quity is not intended for those who sleep on their rights.”
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 36 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hall, Maurice v. Richardson, Reed
quity is not intended for those who sleep on their rights.
cited
Cited "see"
Viverette v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hillsborough County)
See Wilcox v. Singletary, 158 F.3d 1209 , 1210 (11th Cir. 1998), cert. 1 denied, 531 U.S. 840 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Morgan v. State of Florida (Pinellas County)
See Wilcox v. Singletary, 158 F.3d 1209 , 1210 (11th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 840 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Morgan v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pinellas County)
See Wilcox v. Singletary, 158 F.3d 1209 , 1210 (11th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 840 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Vickers v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hillsborough County)
See Wilcox v. Singletary, 158 F.3d 1209 , 1210 (11th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 840 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Blocker v. Graham
See Smith v. McGinnis, 208 F.3d 13, 17 (2d Cir.) (joining sister circuits and holding that the statute of limitations in AEDPA is not jurisdictional), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 840 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Soria-Zavala v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
See Wilcox v. Singletary, 158 F.3d 1209 , 1210 (11th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 840 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Campos-Reyes v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hernando County)
See Wilcox v. Singletary, 158 F.3d 1209 , 1210 (11th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 840 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Wooten v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hillsborough County)
See Wilcox v. Singletary, 158 F.3d 1209 , 1210 (11th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 840 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Capehart v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pinellas County)
See Wilcox v. Singletary, 158 F.3d 1209 , 1210 (11th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 840 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Barringer v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pasco County)
See Wilcox v. Singletary, 158 F.3d 1209 , 1210 (11th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 840 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Marinello
See State v. Casey, 99-23 (La.1/26/00), 775 So.2d 1022 (wherein the supreme court explained that erroneous admission of evidence requires a reversal only if there is a reasonable possibility that the evidence might have contributed to the verdict), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 840 , 121 S.Ct. 104 , 148 L.Ed.2d 62 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Collins v. Hendrickson
See Wilcox v. Florida Dep’t of Corrs., 158 F.3d 1209 , 1210 (11th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 840 , 121 S.Ct. 103 , 148 L.Ed.2d 62 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Rhew v. Beck
See Smith v. McGinnis, 208 F.3d 13 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 840 , 121 S.Ct. 104 , 148 L.Ed.2d 63 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Burns v. Beck
See Smith v. McGinnis, 208 F.3d 13 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 840 , 121 S.Ct. 104 , 148 L.Ed.2d 63 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Frazier v. Rogerson
See Smith v. McGinnis, 208 F.3d 13, 18 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 840 , 121 S.Ct. 104 , 148 L.Ed.2d 63 (2000); Turner v. Johnson, 177 F.3d *835 390, 392 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1007 , 120 S.Ct. 504 , 145 L.Ed.2d 389 (1999); cf. Paige v. United States, 171 F.3d 559, 561 (8th Cir.1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Shuler
See State v. Johnson, 338 S.C. 114 , 525 S.E.2d 519 , cert. denied 531 U.S. 840 , 121 S.Ct. 104 , 148 L.Ed.2d 62 (2000) (crime scene photographs relevant to physical torture); State v. Franklin, 318 S.C. 47 , 456 S.E.2d 357 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 856 , 116 S.Ct. 160 , 133 L.Ed.2d 103 (photographs admissible in penalty phase of capital proceeding as relevant to issue of physical torture).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wade Johnson v. Roy L. Hendricks, Attorney General of the State of New Jersey
See Smith v. McGinnis, 208 F.3d 13, 17 (2d Cir.) (§ 2244(d)(2)’s *162 tolling provision excludes time during which a properly filed state post-conviction is pending but does not reset the date from which the one-year limitations period begins to run), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 840 , 121 S.Ct. 104 , 148 L.Ed.2d 63 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Hendricks
See Smith v. McGinnis, 208 F.3d 13, 17 (2d Cir.) (§ 2244(d)(2)'s tolling provision excludes time during which a properly filed state post- conviction is pending but does not reset the date from which the one-year limitations period begins to run), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 840 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Clark v. Barkley
See id. at 102-03; see' also Smith v. McGinnis, 208 F.3d 13, 17 (2d Cir.) (per curiam), cert, denied, 531 U.S. 840 , 121 S.Ct. 104 , 148 L.Ed.2d 63 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Parfait
See, State v. Casey, 99-0023 (La.1/26/00), 775 So.2d 1022, 1029 , cert. denied, 531 U.S. 840 , 121 S.Ct. 104 , 148 L.Ed.2d 62 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Hanifi Jihad v. Sheryl Ramstad Hvass, Commissioner of Corrections
See Smith v. McGinnis, 208 F.3d 13, 18 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 840 , 121 S.Ct. 104 , 148 L.Ed.2d 63 (2000); Turner v. Johnson, 177 F.3d 390, 392 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1007 , 120 S.Ct. 504 , 145 L.Ed.2d 389 (1999); cf. Paige v. United States, 171 F.3d 559, 561 (8th Cir.1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hanifi Jihad v. Sheryl Ramstad Hvass
See Smith v. McGinnis, 208 F.3d 13, 18 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 840 (2000); Turner v. Johnson, 177 F.3d 390, 392 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1007 (1999); cf. Paige v. United States, 171 F.3d 559, 561 (8th Cir. 1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sanders v. Moore
See Wilcox v. Florida Department of Corrections, 158 F.3d 1209, 1211 (11th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 840 , 121 S.Ct. 103 , 148 L.Ed.2d 62 (2000) and Goodman v. United States, 151 F.3d 1335, 1337-38 (11th Cir.1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Harrison v. Artuz
See Smith v. McGinnis, 208 F.3d 13, 17 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 840 , 121 S.Ct. 104 , 148 L.Ed.2d 63 (2000); Ross, 150 F.3d at 102-03 .
cited
Cited "see"
Qabail Hizbullahankhamon v. Hans Walker, the Superintendent of Auburn Correctional Facility
See Smith v. McGinnis, 208 F.3d 13, 17 (2d Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 840 , 121 S.Ct. 104 , 148 L.Ed.2d 63 (2000); Ross, 150 F.3d at 102-03 .
cited
Cited "see"
Fermin v. United States
See Smith v. McGinnis, 208 F.3d 13, 17 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 531 U.S. 840 , 121 S.Ct. 104 , 148 L.Ed.2d 63 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Yoho v. Thompson
(2×)
See State v. Johnson, 338 S.C. 114, 124 , 525 S.E.2d 519, 524 , cert. den., 531 U.S. 840 , 121 S.Ct. 104 , 148 L.Ed.2d 62 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Johnson
See State v. Casey, 99-0023, p. 9 (La.1/26/00), 775 So.2d 1022, 1031 , cert. denied, 531 U.S. 840 , 121 S.Ct. 104 , 148 L.Ed.2d 62 (2000) (citing State v. Mussall, 523 So.2d 1305, 1310 (La.1988)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Turner
See also State v. Casey , 1999-0023 (La. 1/26/00), 775 So.2d 1022 , cert . denied , 531 U.S. 840 , 121 S.Ct. 104 , 148 L.Ed.2d 62 (2000) ; State v. Hart , 96-0697 (La. 3/7/97), 691 So.2d 651 ; State v. Taylor , supra ; State v. Smith , supra ; State v. Eaton , supra ; State v. Bates , 495 So.2d 1262 (La. 1986), cert. denied , 481 U.S. 1042 , 107 S.Ct. 1986 , 95 L.Ed.2d 826 (1987) ; State v. Jarman , 445 So.2d 1184 (La. 1984) ; State v. Messer , 408 So.2d 1354 (La. 1982) ; State v. Mills , 505 So.2d 933 (La.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Turner
See also State v. Casey , 1999-0023 (La. 1/26/00), 775 So.2d 1022 , cert . denied , 531 U.S. 840 , 121 S.Ct. 104 , 148 L.Ed.2d 62 (2000) ; State v. Hart , 96-0697 (La. 3/7/97), 691 So.2d 651 ; State v. Taylor , supra ; State v. Smith , supra ; State v. Eaton , supra ; State v. Bates , 495 So.2d 1262 (La. 1986), cert. denied , 481 U.S. 1042 , 107 S.Ct. 1986 , 95 L.Ed.2d 826 (1987) ; State v. Jarman , 445 So.2d 1184 (La. 1984) ; State v. Messer , 408 So.2d 1354 (La. 1982) ; State v. Mills , 505 So.2d 933 (La.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cleveland v. Bradshaw
Souter, 395 F.3d at 590 (quoting Schlup v. Delo, 513 U.S. 298, 321 , 115 S.Ct. 851 , 130 L.Ed.2d 808 (1995)); King v. Bell, 378 F.3d 550, 553 (6th Cir. Aug. 3, 2004) (citing Dunlap v. United States, 250 F.3d 1001, 1009 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1057 , 122 S.Ct. 649 , 151 L.Ed.2d 566 (2001)); see also Smith v. McGinnis, 208 F.3d 13, 17 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 840 , 121 S.Ct. 104 , 148 L.Ed.2d 63 (2000) (rare and exceptional). *772 A. Extraordinary Circumstances The Sixth Circuit has allowed for equitable tolling based on actual innocence under certain limited and extraordinar…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sudberry v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
The tolling provision, however, does not “ ‘revive’ the limitations period (i.e., restart the clock at zero); it can only serve to pause a clock that has not yet fully expired.” Rashid v. Khulmann, 991 F.Supp. 254, 259 (S.D.N.Y.1998); see also Smith v. McGinnis, 208 F.3d 13, 16-17 (2nd Cir.) (and cases cited therein), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 840 , 121 S.Ct. 104 , 148 L.Ed.2d 63 (2000); Sorce v. Artuz, 73 F.Supp.2d 292, 294 (E.D.N.Y.1999) (and cases cited therein); Blasi v. Attorney General of Pennsylvania, 30 F.Supp.2d 481, 485 (M.D.Pa.1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Colbert v. Tambi
See also Smith v. McGinnis, 208 F.3d 13, 16-17 (2nd Cir.) (and cases cited therein), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 840 , 121 S.Ct. 104 , 148 L.Ed.2d 63 (2000); Sorce v. Artuz, 73 F.Supp.2d 292, 294 (E.D.N.Y.1999) (and cases cited therein); Blasi v. Attorney General of Pennsylvania, 30 F.Supp.2d 481, 485 (M.D.Pa.1998). 8 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Brigian v. Artuz
See id. at 102-03; see also Smith v. McGinnis, 208 F.3d 13, 17 (2d Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 840 , 121 S.Ct. 104 , 148 L.Ed.2d 63 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Luke v. Edwards
Specifically, “a state court petition is ‘pending’ from the time it ís first filed until finally disposed of and further appellate review is unavailable under the particular state’s procedures.” Bennett v. Artuz, 199 F.3d 116, 120 (2d Cir.1999), aff'd on other grounds, 531 U.S. 4 , 121 S.Ct. 361 , 148 L.Ed.2d 213 (U.S. 2000); see also Smith v. McGinnis, 208 F.3d 13, 17 (2d Cir.) (per curiam) (holding that the “tolling provision excludes time during which properly filed state relief applications are pending but does not reset the date from which the one-year statute of limitations …
Collier
v.
Nelson, Warden
v.
Nelson, Warden
No. 99-9664.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 2000.
Published
Citer courts: W.D. Wisconsin (1)
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.