Espinoza v. United States, 534 U.S. 1086 (2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Espinoza v. United States, 534 U.S. 1086 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
44 citation events (44 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Lewis v. State (alacrimapp, 2003-05-30)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
cited Cited "see" Lewis v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ex parte Taylor, 808 So.2d 1215 (Ala.2001), cert. denied 534 U.S. 1086 , 122 S.Ct. 824 , 151 L.Ed.2d 705 (2002).
cited Cited "see" Hocker v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Taylor v. State , 808 So.2d 1148 (Ala.Crim.App. 2000), aff'd, 808 So.2d 1215 (Ala. 2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1086 , 122 S.Ct. 824 , 151 L.Ed.2d 705 (2002).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Reynolds v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Taylor v. State, 808 So.2d 1148, 1173-74 (Ala.Crim.App.2000), aff'd, 808 So.2d 1215 (Ala.2001), cert. denied, Taylor v. Alabama, 534 U.S. 1086 , 122 S.Ct. 824 , 151 L.Ed.2d 705 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Johnson v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Gaddy v. State, 698 So.2d 1100, 1147 (Ala.Cr.App.1995), aff'd, 698 So.2d 1150 (Ala.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1032 , 118 S.Ct. 634 , 139 L.Ed.2d 613 (1997) (denying a request to send written charges back with the jury during its deliberations during the guilt phase in a capital murder trial was not error).” Apicella v. State, 809 So.2d 841, 862 (Ala.Crim.App.2000), affirmed, Ex parte Apicella, 809 So.2d 865 (Ala.2001), cert. denied, Apicella v. Alabama, 534 U.S. 1086 , 122 S.Ct. 824 , 151 L.Ed.2d 706 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lewis v. State (2×)
Ala. Crim. App. · 2007 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 808 So.2d 1148, 1167 (Ala.Crim.App.2000), aff'd, 808 So.2d 1215 (Ala.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1086 , 122 S.Ct. 824 , 151 L.Ed.2d 705 (2002). “ ‘ “If a State chooses to permit the admission of victim impact evidence and prosecutorial argument on that subject, the Eighth Amendment erects no per se bar.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Irvin v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 2005 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 808 So.2d 1148, 1201 (Ala.Crim.App. 2000), aff'd, 808 So.2d 1215 (Ala. 2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1086 , 122 S.Ct. 824 , 151 L.Ed.2d 705 (2002), in which this Court upheld imposition of Taylor's death sentence based on the fact that Taylor — and not his codefendant — was the triggerman who actually shot and killed the victim.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Miller v. State (2×)
Ala. Crim. App. · 2004 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 808 So.2d 1148, 1167 (Ala. Crim.App.2000), aff'd, 808 So.2d 1215 (Ala. 2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1086 , 122 S.Ct. 824 , 151 L.Ed.2d 705 (2002); Boyd v. State, 746 So.2d 364, 383 (Ala.Crim.App. 1999).
Espinoza
v.
United States
No. 01-6430.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 7, 2002.
534 U.S. 1086
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.