green
Positive treatment
8.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
James Armando Card, Sr. v. Julie L. Jones, etc. – Corrected Opinion
See Card v. State, 803 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 2001) cert. denied Card v. Florida, 536 U.S. 963 (2002); see also Fla. R.
cited
Cited "see"
James Armando Card, Sr. v. Julie L. Jones, etc.
See Card v. State, 803 So.2d 613 (Fla. 2001) cert. denied Card v. Florida 536 U.S. 963 , 122 S.Ct. 2673 , 153 L.Ed.2d 845 (2002); see also Fla. R.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Briseno
Discussion We have consistently held that, “absent a request for a limiting instruction concerning gang evidence and absent any objection for failure to give a limiting instruction on gang evidence, a trial court is not obligated to give such an instruction.” State v. Conway, 284 Kan. 37, 50 , 159 P.3d 917 (2007); see State v. Gholston, 272 Kan. 601, 614-15 , 35 P.3d 868 , cert. denied 536 U.S. 963 (2002); State v. Jamison, 269 Kan. 564, 568 , 7 P.3d 1204 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Kelly v. Day
See Kelly v. Town of Chelmsford, 23 Fed.Appx. 18 (1st Cir.2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 963 , 122 S.Ct. 2672 , 153 L.Ed.2d 845 (2002); Kelly v. Town of Chelmsford, No. 01-10635-RWZ (D.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Sappington
See State v. Gholston, 272 Kan. 601, 613 , 35 P.3d 868 (2001), cert, denied 536 U.S. 963 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Wade
See State v. Gholston, 272 Kan. 601, 613 , 35 P.3d 868 (2001), cert. denied 536 U.S. 963 (2002) (holding that even where the defendant concedes the cause of death, the prosecutor has the *546 burden to prove all the elements of the crime charged, and evidence including the fact and manner of death and the violent nature of the crime are relevant and admissible).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Stout
See State v. Gholston, 272 Kan. 601 , Syl. ¶ 1, 35 P.3d 868 (2001), cert. denied 536 U.S. 963 (2002) (‘Where a person inflicts upon another a wound which is calculated to endanger or destroy life, it is not a defense to a charge of homicide that the alleged victim’s death was contributed to or *520 caused by the negligence of the attending physicians or surgeons.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Simmons
See State v. Gholston, 212 Kan. 601, 616-18, 35 P.3d 868 (2001), cert. denied 536 U.S. 963 (2002); Humphrey, 267 Kan. at 62-63 ; Abel, 261 Kan. at 336 ; State v. Noriega, 261 Kan. 440, 447 , 932 P.2d 940 (1997), disapproved on other grounds Mathenia, 262 Kan. 890 , Syl. ¶ 3. *738 The Court of Appeals cited no authority for its conclusion that accomplice liability might arise because of the failure to stop or report a crime.
cited
Cited "see"
Booska v. State
See Hertz v. State, 803 So.2d 629, 642 (Fla.2001), ce rt. denied, 536 U.S. 963 , 122 S.Ct. 2673 , 153 L.Ed.2d 846 (2002). .
cited
Cited "see"
Hertz v. State
See Hertz v. Florida, 536 U.S. 963 , 122 S.Ct. 2673 , 153 L.Ed.2d 846 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Adams
See State v. Gholston, 272 Kan. 601, 609, 35 P.3d 868 (2001), cert denied 536 U.S. 963 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rene Ramos Galvan v. United States
See Bryson v. United States, 268 F.3d 560, 562 (8th Cir.2001) (conclusory allegations are insufficient to establish ineffective assistance), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 963 , 122 S.Ct. 2671 , 153 L.Ed.2d 844 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
Lara v. State
See Card v. State, 803 So.2d 613 (Fla.2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 963 , 122 S.Ct. 2673 , 153 L.Ed.2d 845 (2002); First v. State, 696 So.2d 1357 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Weaver
See State v. Sanders, 272 Kan. 445, 458 , 33 P.3d 596 , cert. denied 536 U.S. 963 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jeffrey C. Rahn v. Vickie Hawkins Craig Jansen Gerald Fitzgerald
Several of our sister circuits have held that “where a fault in the trial proceedings constitutes a structural error, the third prong of the Olano test is satisfied, and a specific showing of prejudice is not necessary.” United States v. Recio, 371 F.3d 1093, 1101 (9th Cir.2004); see also United *820 States v. Vazquez, 271 F.3d 93, 100 (3d Cir.2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 963 , 122 S.Ct. 2672 , 153 L.Ed.2d 845 (2002); United States v. David 83 F.3d 638, 646-47 (4th Cir.1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jeffrey C. Rahn v. Vickie Hawkins
Several of our sister circuits have held that "where a fault in the trial proceedings constitutes a structural error, the third prong of the Olano test is satisfied, and a specific showing of prejudice is not necessary." United States v. Recio, 371 F.3d 1093, 1101 (9th Cir. 2004); see also United States v. Vazquez, 271 F.3d 93, 100 (3d Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 963 (2002); United States v. David, 83 F.3d 638, 646-47 (4th Cir. 1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Mays
See also State v. Gholston, 272 Kan. 601, 605-09 , 35 P.3d 868 (2001), cert. denied 536 U.S. 963 (2002) (no medical evidence required to establish cause of death where victim suffered gunshot wound to head and life support was withdrawn; defendant presented no evidence of superseding cause of death).
Wilcox
v.
United States
v.
United States
01-8794.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 28, 2002.
Published
WILCOX
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 01-8794.
Supreme Court of the United States.
June 28, 2002.
1
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 273 F. 3d 1113.