green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Gencorp Inc v. Olin Corp
See Cooper Indus., Inc. v. Aviall Servs., Inc., 540 U.S. 1099 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
Gencorp, Inc. v. Olin Corporation
See Cooper Indus., Inc. v. Aviall Servs., Inc., 540 U.S. 1099 , 124 S.Ct. 981 , 157 L.Ed.2d 811 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kevin Wayne Anderson v. Mitch Morrow, Superintendent, Oregon State Correctional Institution
See Horn v. Banks, 536 U.S. 266, 272 , 122 S.Ct. 2147 , 153 L.Ed.2d 301 (2002). 2 An aspect of the doctrine applied in Kelly v. Small is currently undergoing Supreme Court review in Pliler v. Ford, 540 U.S. 1099 , 124 S.Ct. 981 , 157 L.Ed.2d 811 (2004) (granting writ of certiorari to review Ford v. Hubbard, 330 F.3d 1086 (9th Cir.2003)).
Hibbs, Director, Arizona Department of Revenue
v.
Winn
v.
Winn
No. 02-1809.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 2004.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 539 U. S. 986.] Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.