green
Positive treatment
9.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Camreta v. Greene Ex Rel. S. G.
(5×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
And applying this Court’s usual bar on review would undermine the purpose of the two-step process, “which is to clarify constitutional rights without undue delay.” Bunting v. Mellen, 541 U. S. 1019, 1024 (SCALIA, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Hubbard v. Taylor
See Morse v. Frederick, — U.S. —, 127 S. Ct. 2618, 2641 (2007) (Breyer, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part); see also Brousseau v. Haugen, 543 U.S. 194, 201-02 (2004) (Breyer, J., joined by Scalia and Ginsburg, JJ., concurring); Bunting v. Mellen, 541 U.S. 1019, 1019 (2004) (Stevens, J., joined by Ginsburg and Breyer, JJ., respecting denial of certiorari); id. at 1022-23 (Scalia, J., joined by Rehnquist, C.J., dissenting).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Scott v. Harris
See, e. g., Brosseau, supra, at 201 (Breyer, J., joined by Scalia and Ginsburg, JJ., concurring); Bunting v. Mellen, 541 U. S. 1019 (2004) (Stevens, J., joined by Ginsburg and Breyer, JJ., respecting denial of certiorari); id., at 1025 (Scalia, J., joined by Rehnquist, C.
examined
Cited "see"
Camreta v. Greene
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Ed. 2d 258 (internal quotation marks omitted); see Bunting, 541 U.S., at 1023 , 124 S. Ct. 1750 , 158 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Doe v. SCHOOL BOARD FOR SANTA ROSA COUNTY, FLORIDA
See Mellen v. Bunting, 327 F.3d 355, 364 (4th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1019 , 124 S.Ct. 1750 , 158 L.Ed.2d 636 (2004). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Keating v. City of Miami
See Bunting v. Mellen, 541 U.S. 1019, 1019 , 124 S.Ct. 1750 , 158 L.Ed.2d 636 (2004) (denying certiorari on the issue of whether state action was a constitutional violation, even though it was not clearly established). 3 For better or worse, whether on interlocutory appeal or appeal from a final judgment, the Supreme Court has stated that an appellate court “reviews judgments, not statements in opinions.” California v. Rooney, 483 U.S. 307, 311 , 107 S.Ct. 2852 , 97 L.Ed.2d 258 (1987) (per curiam) (quotation omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lyons v. Xenia
See Bunting, 541 U.S. at 1023–24 (Scalia and Rehnquist, JJ., dissenting from the denial of certiorari); see also Horne v. Coughlin, 191 F.3d 244, 247 (2d Cir. 1999); Kalka v. Hawk, 215 F.3d 90, 96 (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Cheryl D. Lyons v. City of Xenia, Christine Keith, Officer Matthew Foubert, Officer
(2×)
See Bunting, 541 U.S. at 1023-24 , 124 S.Ct. 1750 (Scalia and Rehnquist, JJ., dissenting from the denial of certiorari); see also Horne v. Coughlin, 191 F.3d 244, 247 (2d Cir.1999); Kalka v. Hawk, 215 F.3d 90, 96 (D.C.Cir.2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Renee Legrand v. York County Judge of Probate
Additionally, a court has an "interest in preventing litigants from attempting to manipulate [its] jurisdiction to insulate a favorable decision from review.” City of Erie v. Pap’s A.M., 529 U.S. 277, 288 , 120 S.Ct. 1382 , 146 L.Ed.2d 265 (2000); see also Bunting v. Mellen, 541 U.S. 1019, 1020-21 , 124 S.Ct. 1750 , 158 L.Ed.2d 636 (2004) (Stevens, J., concurring).
Duggins
v.
United States
v.
United States
03-9598.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 26, 2004.
Published
DUGGINS
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 03-9598.
Supreme Court of United States.
April 26, 2004.
1
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.